The search landscape has fundamentally transformed—AI-powered platforms now answer billions of queries before users ever see a traditional link, forcing marketersThe search landscape has fundamentally transformed—AI-powered platforms now answer billions of queries before users ever see a traditional link, forcing marketers

Beyond Google: How LLM Search Engines Are Reshaping SEO Strategy in 2025

The search landscape has fundamentally transformed—AI-powered platforms now answer billions of queries before users ever see a traditional link, forcing marketers to reimagine everything they know about visibility and discovery. By the end of 2025, LLM SEO has emerged not as a replacement for traditional search optimization, but as a critical parallel strategy that determines whether brands survive or thrive in the age of generative answers.

For years, SEO professionals obsessed over rankings, backlinks, and keyword density. Today, those metrics tell only half the story. When ChatGPT recommends your brand by name, visitors convert at rates traditional search can’t match. When Perplexity cites your expertise, you’ve earned something more valuable than a click—you’ve established algorithmic authority.

This comprehensive guide examines how LLM search engines are reshaping SEO https://icoda.io/services/ai-seo/ strategy, what the data reveals about this shift, and the actionable frameworks your organization needs to compete in 2026 and beyond.

Understanding the LLM SEO Revolution

LLM SEO represents a fundamental departure from traditional search optimization, focusing on making content discoverable and citable by AI systems rather than simply ranking on search engine results pages. Unlike classic SEO focused on keyword density and backlink profiles, LLM optimization demands structured content that AI models can parse, entity clarity connecting your brand to authoritative knowledge graphs, and distribution strategies seeding your expertise across platforms LLMs trust.

“Vlad Pivnev, founder of ICODA, the first agency specializing in LLM SEO, explains: “We’re witnessing the most significant shift in search behavior since Google’s founding. The brands that recognize this aren’t just adapting—they’re building competitive moats that will define their industries for the next decade.”

The terminology surrounding this shift remains in flux. Practitioners use terms like Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), Large Language Model Optimization (LLMO), Answer Engine Optimization (AEO), and AI SEO interchangeably. Regardless of the label, the goal remains consistent: become the source that AI systems trust, cite, and recommend when users seek answers.

How LLMs Process and Select Content

Large language models don’t scan for keywords—they interpret meaning. They evaluate credibility by cross-referencing sources, connecting concepts across paragraphs, and assessing whether content demonstrates genuine expertise. Surface-level keyword optimization fails because AI models detect when content lacks substance.

The processing methodology differs significantly from traditional search crawlers:

  • Semantic understanding: LLMs comprehend context and nuance, rewarding content that explains concepts clearly rather than repeating phrases
  • Entity recognition: AI systems identify and validate named entities against knowledge graphs
  • Source triangulation: Models cross-reference claims across multiple trusted sources before inclusion
  • Chunk extraction: LLMs extract logically complete text fragments of approximately 100-300 tokens for generating responses

According to ICODA’s observations working with early adopters, content structured into clear, self-contained sections with definitive statements performs significantly better in AI citations than content requiring readers to synthesize information across multiple paragraphs.

The Market Shift: Data Defining the Transformation

AI search platforms have experienced explosive growth, fundamentally altering how users discover information and make decisions. ChatGPT reached 800 million weekly users by March 2025, while Perplexity surged to 22 million active users processing over 780 million monthly queries—a 243% year-over-year increase. These aren’t niche platforms; they’re becoming primary research tools for decision-makers worldwide.

The conversion quality tells an even more compelling story. Research from SE Ranking found visitors arriving from AI platforms spend 67.7% more time on sites than those from organic search—an average of 9 minutes 19 seconds compared to 5 minutes 33 seconds for Google. LLM visitors convert at 4.4x higher rates than organic search visitors according to Semrush data, while AI traffic drove 12.1% more signups for Ahrefs despite representing only 0.5% of total visitors.

Google AI Overviews: The CTR Collapse

Perhaps the most alarming data point for traditional SEO practitioners comes from Google’s own AI implementation. Seer Interactive’s September 2025 study analyzed over 25 million impressions across 3,119 informational queries and revealed staggering declines:

MetricPrevious RateCurrent RateDecline
Organic CTR (with AI Overviews)1.76%0.61%61%
Paid CTR (with AI Overviews)19.7%6.34%68%
Organic CTR (without AI Overviews)2.72%1.62%41%

The data reveals a crucial nuance: even queries without AI Overviews experienced 41% CTR declines year-over-year, suggesting broader behavioral shifts beyond Google’s AI features. Users increasingly seek answers through ChatGPT, Perplexity, and social platforms before turning to traditional search.

However, brands cited in AI Overviews earned 35% more organic clicks and 91% more paid clicks compared to non-cited competitors on the same queries. This creates a binary outcome: either optimize for AI citation and maintain visibility, or watch traffic erode regardless of traditional ranking performance.

Five Core Strategies for LLM SEO Success

ICODA has identified three key shifts in how companies approach search: the move from traffic metrics to visibility metrics, the emphasis on entity clarity over keyword targeting, and the requirement for content that serves as training material rather than simply ranking fodder. Building on these shifts, successful LLM optimization requires implementing strategies across multiple dimensions simultaneously.

1. Topical Authority Through Content Clustering

Create interconnected content ecosystems that demonstrate comprehensive expertise rather than isolated articles targeting individual keywords. LLMs prefer content that shows depth and breadth on subjects, positioning brands as authoritative knowledge sources.

The approach involves selecting a main topic and developing 8-15 interlinked pieces covering different angles: beginner guides, advanced applications, common mistakes, expert perspectives, use cases, and emerging trends. One B2B SaaS client documented by SEO practitioners organized content around “Predictive Maintenance,” developing ten interlinked posts. ChatGPT-4 began citing these posts as a resource, increasing their web traffic by 28% in three months.

Implementation framework:

  • Map your core expertise areas to potential content clusters
  • Identify subtopics that comprehensively address user questions at different knowledge levels
  • Build internal linking architecture that connects related pieces logically
  • Update cluster content regularly to maintain freshness signals

2. Structural Optimization for AI Extraction

AI systems extract and cite content more readily when it follows predictable patterns. Research from Amsive Digital found content with consistent heading hierarchies (H2 followed by H3 with bullet points) was 40% more likely to be rephrased in AI responses.

Critical structural elements:

  • Begin each section with a conclusion sentence under 160 characters that directly answers the implied question
  • Use semantic HTML markup and proper heading hierarchies
  • Include FAQ sections addressing common queries in your domain
  • Add TL;DR summaries providing overview conclusions at article openings
  • Structure content into logical chunks of 75-225 words that can stand alone as complete thoughts

The principle extends beyond formatting. Marie Haynes’ research emphasized “fact-checkable snippets”—when content includes clear, verifiable facts with supporting data, LLMs demonstrate higher confidence in citation.

3. Entity SEO and Brand Consistency

According to Backlinko research, entity SEO ranks among the most critical aspects of LLM optimization. AI systems gather information not just from content but from what your brand represents across the entire web. Inconsistencies in brand naming, product descriptions, or positioning create confusion that reduces citation probability.

Maintain consistent brand elements across all digital properties:

  • Use identical brand names and product terminology on all pages
  • Ensure business information matches across Google Business Profile, social platforms, and industry directories
  • Build connections to established knowledge graphs through schema markup
  • Develop relationships with authoritative entities in your industry through partnerships, citations, and collaborative content

Knowledge graph optimization offers particular leverage. Ensuring Google’s Knowledge Graph contains accurate, comprehensive information about your brand reduces hallucination risk when AI systems generate responses about your organization.

4. Technical Foundation for AI Accessibility

Technical SEO remains foundational—speed, structure, and indexability support both traditional search and AI discovery. However, LLM optimization adds specific requirements:

  • Schema markup: Implement Article, FAQ, HowTo, and Organization schemas to provide structured context
  • Crawlability optimization: Ensure AI crawlers (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot) can access and index relevant content
  • Canonicalization: Proper canonical tags align with LLM summarization patterns
  • Internal linking: Build content clusters with logical navigation paths

The robots.txt decision deserves particular attention. While some publishers have blocked AI crawlers entirely, this approach may sacrifice visibility for short-term content protection. Organizations must weigh whether maintaining training access serves long-term discoverability goals.

5. Multi-Platform Citation Strategy

LLMs draw training data and real-time information from diverse sources. Reddit, YouTube, and G2 consistently rank among the most-cited domains across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Strategic presence across these platforms amplifies citation probability.

Platform priorities for citation:

  • Reddit: Engage authentically in relevant subreddits; AI systems frequently cite Reddit discussions
  • YouTube: Create authoritative video content that AI can transcribe and reference
  • Industry review sites: Maintain strong presence on G2, Capterra, and vertical-specific review platforms
  • Academic and research platforms: Publish original research where applicable to establish expertise signals
  • Professional networks: LinkedIn thought leadership content increasingly appears in AI responses

The goal isn’t promotional content distribution but establishing legitimate expertise markers across platforms LLMs trust.

Measuring Success: New Metrics for the AI Era

Traditional SEO metrics focused on rankings, traffic, and conversions—metrics that remain relevant but insufficient for measuring AI visibility. The shift from click-driven optimization to citation-driven optimization requires new measurement frameworks.

Share of Voice in AI Responses

Track how frequently your brand appears in AI-generated responses for target queries compared to competitors. Tools like Seer’s Generative AI tracker and specialized platforms like Ziptie enable systematic monitoring of AI citation frequency across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.

Citation Quality Assessment

Not all AI mentions carry equal weight. First-position citations in multi-source responses demonstrate higher authority than final-position mentions. Track:

  • Position within AI responses (first, middle, or last citation)
  • Context of citation (primary source vs. supplementary mention)
  • Citation sentiment (recommended, mentioned, or cautioned against)
  • Citation consistency across different AI platforms

Conversion Rate by Referral Source

AI-referred traffic behaves differently from organic search visitors. Implement UTM parameters tracking AI platform referrals separately and compare conversion metrics:

Referral SourceTypical Conversion RateSession DurationPages per Visit
ChatGPT4.2-4.8x organic1.7x organic0.8x organic
Perplexity3.8-4.2x organic1.5x organic0.9x organic
Google AI Overviews1.4-1.8x organic1.2x organic0.7x organic
Traditional Organic1.0x (baseline)1.0x (baseline)1.0x (baseline)

Note: Ranges represent industry variations; your results may differ based on sector and user intent.

Impression vs. Click Reconciliation

AI Overviews create dual impression counting—Google registers impressions for both AI Overview appearances and traditional organic positions. Monitor the gap between impressions and clicks; growing divergence indicates increased zero-click behavior requiring strategy adjustment.

Industry-Specific Considerations

LLM SEO impact varies significantly across industries based on query types, purchase journeys, and competitive dynamics.

High-Impact Sectors

Financial services, healthcare, and legal industries see disproportionately high AI visitor rates according to Search Engine Land analysis. These consultancy-driven sectors benefit from AI’s preference for authoritative, comprehensive content addressing complex questions.

Software and SaaS companies experience strong citation rates on technical queries but face challenges with product comparison queries where AI systems synthesize across multiple sources.

E-commerce businesses face unique challenges—ChatGPT referral traffic to e-commerce sites generates lower conversion rates and revenue per session than Google organic according to recent research. However, product recommendation queries increasingly trigger AI responses, making visibility essential even if conversion patterns differ.

Emerging Opportunities

B2B companies with deep expertise content find AI citations particularly valuable for lead generation. When ChatGPT recommends a specific solution provider, prospects arrive pre-qualified and further along the purchase journey.

Professional services firms can establish authority through comprehensive resource development. AI systems prefer content demonstrating genuine expertise over generic marketing material, creating advantages for firms willing to share knowledge.

Building an LLM SEO Strategy: Practical Framework

Implementing LLM optimization alongside traditional SEO requires organizational alignment and systematic execution. The following framework provides a starting structure:

Phase 1: Assessment (Weeks 1-2)

  • Audit current AI visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews for priority queries
  • Identify competitors receiving citations you’re not
  • Evaluate content structure against LLM extraction best practices
  • Assess technical infrastructure for AI crawler accessibility

Phase 2: Foundation (Weeks 3-6)

  • Implement schema markup across key content
  • Restructure priority pages with AI-optimized formatting
  • Develop entity consistency across digital properties
  • Establish measurement infrastructure for AI citation tracking

Phase 3: Content Development (Weeks 7-12)

  • Build topical authority clusters around core expertise areas
  • Create FAQ content addressing common queries in your domain
  • Develop original research or data that provides unique value
  • Establish presence on high-citation platforms (Reddit, YouTube, industry forums)

Phase 4: Ongoing Optimization (Continuous)

  • Monitor AI citation frequency and competitive positioning weekly
  • Update existing content to maintain freshness and accuracy
  • Test different structural approaches to improve citation rates
  • Expand content clusters based on emerging query patterns

The Path Forward

The LLM search revolution isn’t a future scenario—it’s the current reality reshaping digital marketing. Gartner research projects traditional search engine volume will drop 25% by 2026 as users increasingly rely on AI assistants. Organizations delaying adaptation will find competitors capturing the algorithmic authority positions that become increasingly difficult to displace.

The encouraging news: LLM SEO rewards genuine expertise over gaming tactics. AI systems detect when content lacks substance and cross-reference claims against authoritative sources. This levels the playing field for organizations with real knowledge to share, penalizing those relying on outdated manipulation techniques.

Success requires embracing a fundamental shift in perspective—from optimizing for rankings to optimizing for trust, from measuring traffic to measuring visibility, from creating content that attracts to creating content that educates. The marketers thriving in 2025 stopped asking “how do we rank higher?” and started asking “how do we become the answer?”

The AI search transformation represents both the greatest challenge and greatest opportunity in modern digital marketing. Those who master LLM SEO now will establish competitive advantages that compound as AI adoption accelerates. Those who wait may find the window for establishing algorithmic authority has closed.

The question isn’t whether to adapt—it’s whether you’ll lead the transformation or follow competitors who moved first.

Comments
Market Opportunity
Large Language Model Logo
Large Language Model Price(LLM)
$0,0003173
$0,0003173$0,0003173
-1,76%
USD
Large Language Model (LLM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Sensura to Showcase Non-Invasive Health Monitoring Platform, Starting with Glucose, at CES 2026

Sensura to Showcase Non-Invasive Health Monitoring Platform, Starting with Glucose, at CES 2026

LAS VEGAS, Jan. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Sensura, a Singapore-based deep-tech company focused on next-generation health and wellness monitoring, today announced that
Share
AI Journal2026/01/07 11:30
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36