The U.S. government could be required to refund over $133.5 billion if the Supreme Court rules that Trump’s tariffs are illegal.The U.S. government could be required to refund over $133.5 billion if the Supreme Court rules that Trump’s tariffs are illegal.

U.S. government could be required to refund over $133.5 billion if the Supreme Court rules that Trump’s tariffs are illegal

2026/01/07 10:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The U.S. government could be on the hook for more than $133.5 billion in tariff refunds if the Supreme Court rules that tariffs imposed under President Donald Trump’s administration were unlawful, according to the latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The tariffs in question were levied beginning in February 2025 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law meant to be used only in “unusual and extraordinary” national emergencies. The Trump administration used the statute to justify sweeping duties on imports from countries including China, Mexico, and Canada — and later imposed global “reciprocal” tariffs on a broad range of goods.

The legality of these tariffs is now under review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices heard arguments in November and may issue rulings as soon as this Friday, though it remains uncertain which cases will cover the Trump-era tariffs

Supreme Court reviews Trump’s tariffs

The top Supreme Court question is whether Trump’s use of the IEEPA law to impose tariffs on imports was legal or not. If tariffs are ruled to have been illegal, the government may be required to reimburse the companies and individuals who paid the taxes. The outcome of the refund process is still uncertain. 

The Court renders its final decision but does not specify an exact method for those involved in returning money to lower courts or the federal government; rather, it leaves them to decide how to proceed. That means that a considerable period of time will likely elapse before any monies are actually returned.

People following the case online are using betting platforms to predict the Supreme Court’s decision on the Trump-era tariffs. On Kalshi, the odds that the court will rule in Trump’s favor are 30%, while on Polymarket, they are about 23%. Both are lower than the roughly 40% seen after oral arguments in November, indicating that justices seemed uncertain at that time about whether the tariffs were legal.

Trump’s “reciprocal” duties on goods from countries ranging from 10% to 50% were first imposed on April 5, with subsequent reductions in some cases resulting from trade negotiations. Additional punitive duties of 40% were imposed on goods from Brazil on August 6, while Indian goods were subject to an additional punitive duty of 25% on August 27.

How much money did tariffs really raise?

Donald Trump recently claimed on Twitter that the U.S. has already collected—or will soon collect—$600 billion in tariffs. Official data tell a different story. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, total customs duties—tariffs collected on imported goods—reached a record $195 billion in fiscal year 2025, which ended on September 30. Since then, monthly collections have been in the low $30 billion range, meaning the $600 billion figure cited by Trump far exceeds what the government has actually collected.

Trump’s tariffs had a huge effect on many imports. If the Supreme Court were to find these tariffs illegal, it would be a significant blow to the president and a loss for the government.

Experts say this case is particularly important because it will demonstrate the extent of a president’s power and the scope to which laws like the IEEPA can be applied. Some believe the president should have the authority to protect the country’s economy. Others argue that emergency laws should not be used to impose long-term taxes on everyday products.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001058
$0.001058$0.001058
+3.82%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

An agitated President Donald Trump lashed out at two reporters during his White House “Saving College Sports” roundtable, complaining that the journalists failed
Share
Rawstory2026/03/07 07:19
Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

The post Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is likely to outperform gold on price performance
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 07:22