State and federal officials offer starkly different accounts of the shooting, in which an unidentified ICE agent shot US citizen Renee Nicole Good in a residentialState and federal officials offer starkly different accounts of the shooting, in which an unidentified ICE agent shot US citizen Renee Nicole Good in a residential

Tensions in Minneapolis rise over ICE fatal shooting of woman

2026/01/09 09:36

MINNEAPOLIS, USA – Tensions between Minnesota and federal officials deepened on Thursday, January 8, over a US Immigration agent’s fatal shooting of a 37-year-old mother of three in Minneapolis, an incident that drew condemnation from local officials and sparked widespread protests in the state and beyond.

State and federal officials offered starkly different accounts of the shooting, in which an unidentified Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot US citizen Renee Nicole Good in a residential neighborhood.

At the time she was shot, Good was participating in one of numerous “neighborhood patrols” organized by local activists to track, observe, and film ICE activities, according to Michelle Gross, president of the Minnesota-based Community United Against Police Brutality and a paralegal for the National Lawyers Guild.

The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension said on Thursday it had initially agreed with the FBI to conduct a joint investigation into the shooting but that the federal agency had “reversed course” and taken sole control of the probe.

The decision, according to BCA Superintendent Drew Evans, means the state bureau will no longer have access to the scene evidence, case materials, or interviews.

“As a result, the BCA has reluctantly withdrawn from the investigation,” Evans said.

Keith Ellison, the state’s Democratic attorney general, told CNN that the FBI’s decision was “deeply disturbing” and said state authorities could investigate with or without the cooperation of the federal government. He added that the evidence he has seen, including some that has not yet been made public, indicates that state charges are a possibility.

US Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told reporters in New York that the BCA was not “cut out” but did not have jurisdiction.

Democratic Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said at a press conference that any federal investigation that proceeded without state involvement would likely be seen as a “whitewash.”

“And I say that only because people in positions of power … from the president to the vice president to Kristi Noem have already passed judgment and told you things that are verifiably false,” he said.

The FBI declined to comment on the BCA statement.

The ICE agent who shot Good was among 2,000 federal officers that President Donald Trump’s administration had announced it was deploying to the Minneapolis area in what the Department of Homeland Security described as the “largest DHS operation ever.”

DHS officials, including Noem, defended the shooting as self-defense and accused the woman of trying to ram agents in an act of “domestic terrorism.”

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, called that assertion “bullshit” and “garbage” based on bystander videos taken of the incident that appeared to contradict the government’s account.

Both Frey and Walz have called on Trump, a Republican, to withdraw federal agents from the city, saying their presence is sowing chaos in the streets. But the New York Times reported that the administration was deploying more than 100 additional Customs and Border Patrol personnel from other cities in the wake of the shooting.

Vice President JD Vance doubled down on the government’s narrative at a White House press briefing on Thursday, repeatedly calling Good’s actions an “attack” on law enforcement and saying the agent deserved “a debt of gratitude.” He also dismissed the notion that a federal officer could face prosecution by state authorities.

Bystander videos of shooting

The videos showed two masked officers approaching Good’s car, which was stopped at a perpendicular angle on a Minneapolis street. As one officer ordered Good out of the car and grabbed at her door handle, the car briefly reversed and then began driving forward, turning to the right in an apparent attempt to leave the scene.

A third officer, who had been filming the scene before walking to the front of her car, drew his gun and fired three times while jumping back, with the last shots aimed through the driver’s window after the car’s bumper appeared to have passed by his body.

It was unclear from the video whether the car came into contact with the officer, who stayed on his feet and could be seen walking after the incident. Noem said he was taken to a hospital and released the same day, while Trump said on social media that the woman “ran over the ICE Officer.”

Gross, the local activist, told Reuters she knew first-hand of Good’s involvement as one of hundreds of community members taking part in neighborhood “observer” patrols, and “had been doing that” when she was killed.

According to Gross, federal officers had ordered Good to clear away, and she was trying to turn her car around when agents approached her vehicle, with one opening fire as she was “trying to leave” and the automobile pulled away.

Gross disputed assertions by Noem that Good “had been stalking and impeding” agents’ work all day.

“There was absolutely no justification for deadly force,” Gross said. “People are just exercising their First Amendment right to videotape police.”

DHS did not immediately respond to questions about the identity of the agent involved in Wednesday’s shooting.

But Vance said the same agent had been dragged by a car last year and suffered injuries that required 33 stitches. That description matched a case from June 2025, when a migrant living in the country illegally tried to drive away while ICE agents were attempting to arrest him in Bloomington, Minnesota, dragging one officer about 100 yards (91.4 meters).

The officer, identified in court records as Jonathan Ross, suffered wounds to his arm and hand that took a total of 33 stitches to close, according to prosecutors. The driver was convicted last month of assaulting a federal officer.

The shooting left the city on edge, with thousands taking to the streets in protest. On Thursday morning, hundreds of demonstrators gathered at a federal building where an immigration court is housed, chanting “shame” and “murder” at armed and masked federal officers, some of whom used tear gas and pepper balls on protesters.

Protests were also ongoing or planned in other cities, including New York, Chicago, Seattle, Los Angeles and Philadelphia.

Walz has put the state’s National Guard on alert, and Minneapolis public schools were closed on Thursday and Friday as a precautionary measure.

With classes canceled, 17-year-old Addie Flewelling attended the Minneapolis protest on Thursday to condemn the shooting and show her opposition to the immigration crackdown, including a raid at her high school earlier this week.

“Students were chased off of their place of education,” she said. “This is not OK. I’m scared to go to school.”

Good, who was originally from Colorado, had a 15-year-old daughter and two sons aged 12 and 6, according to the Washington Post. She earned a degree in English in 2020 from Virginia’s Old Dominion University, where she won an undergraduate poetry prize.

The Minnesota operation, part of Trump’s nationwide crackdown on migrants, was also mounted in response to a politically charged investigation into fraud allegations against some Minnesota nonprofit groups in the Somali community. Trump has attacked Somalis and Somali Americans in Minnesota as “garbage.” – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
RISE Logo
RISE Price(RISE)
$0.006019
$0.006019$0.006019
-1.45%
USD
RISE (RISE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

The post FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The FBI says Kimsuky APT, a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 02:55
a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

The post a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) secured over $15 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 03:13
Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future A significant warning has emerged from financial giant JPMorgan, signaling a potentially challenging future for the stablecoin market. This isn’t just a minor blip; it’s a stark reminder that the booming world of digital assets faces a critical juncture, especially for those relying on the stability of stablecoins. JPMorgan’s recent research note suggests that unless the broader cryptocurrency market expands dramatically, stablecoin issuers are heading towards a fierce ‘zero-sum game’ scenario. The Alarming Truth About the Stablecoin Market What exactly does a ‘zero-sum game’ mean for the stablecoin market? Essentially, it implies that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another must lose it. This isn’t about overall growth where everyone benefits; it’s about a fixed pie where new entrants only succeed by taking a slice from existing players. JPMorgan analysts point to a rapidly increasing number of new stablecoin projects vying for attention. Tether recently announced its unregulated stablecoin, USAT. Hyperliquid plans to launch USDH, aiming to reduce its dependence on Circle’s USDC. Even traditional fintech powerhouses like Robinhood and Revolut are developing their own stablecoins. This surge of new issuers intensifies competition significantly. While the overall stablecoin market capitalization has reached an impressive $278 billion, its share of the total crypto market has remained stagnant, averaging below 8% since 2020. This stagnation, according to JPMorgan, is a key indicator of the brewing zero-sum challenge. Why is the Stablecoin Market Becoming So Crowded? The influx of new players into the stablecoin market isn’t accidental; it’s driven by various strategic motivations. Many projects aim to gain greater control over their financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on third-party stablecoins. For instance, Hyperliquid’s move to USDH is a clear example of a platform seeking self-sufficiency and potentially lower operational costs. Furthermore, established fintech firms like Robinhood and Revolut see stablecoins as a natural extension of their existing services. They can integrate these digital assets into their platforms, offering new functionalities and potentially attracting a broader user base. However, this expansion comes with a caveat: if the overall crypto market doesn’t grow proportionally, these new offerings will merely fragment the existing demand, making profitability and widespread adoption harder to achieve for all. The core challenge remains the limited expansion of the total crypto market relative to the growing supply of stablecoins. This dynamic creates an environment where innovation must go hand-in-hand with genuine market expansion, not just internal competition. Navigating the Competitive Stablecoin Market Landscape So, what does this intense competition mean for users and the broader crypto ecosystem? For one, it could lead to increased innovation as issuers strive to differentiate their offerings through better features, lower fees, or enhanced security. However, it also presents potential risks, particularly if some stablecoins fail to gain traction or face liquidity issues in a highly competitive environment. Users should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence when choosing stablecoins. For existing giants like USDC, the entry of new competitors means they must continue to innovate and maintain their market leadership. Regulatory clarity also plays a crucial role here. As more entities enter the space, the demand for clear, consistent regulations will only grow, potentially shaping the future landscape of the stablecoin market significantly. Ultimately, the long-term health of the stablecoin ecosystem hinges on the ability of the entire cryptocurrency market to attract new capital and users. Without this broader expansion, JPMorgan’s warning of a zero-sum game could become a stark reality. In conclusion, JPMorgan’s recent warning serves as a potent reminder of the escalating competition within the stablecoin market. While innovation and new entrants are exciting, the core challenge lies in the stagnant growth of the broader crypto market. For stablecoins to truly thrive beyond a zero-sum dynamic, a significant influx of new capital and users into the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem is paramount. The future success of these digital anchors depends on collective market expansion, not just internal rivalry. Frequently Asked Questions About the Stablecoin Market Q1: What is a ‘zero-sum game’ in the context of the stablecoin market? A1: A ‘zero-sum game’ means that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another stablecoin must lose an equivalent amount. It implies that the overall market size for stablecoins is not growing, forcing issuers to compete for a fixed pool of users and capital. Q2: Why is JPMorgan concerned about the stablecoin market? A2: JPMorgan is concerned because despite the stablecoin market’s growth in total value, its share of the overall crypto market capitalization has stagnated. With many new entrants, they believe competition will intensify, leading to a zero-sum dynamic unless the broader crypto market significantly expands. Q3: Which new stablecoin issuers are mentioned in the warning? A3: The warning highlights new entrants such as Tether’s unregulated stablecoin USAT, Hyperliquid’s planned USDH, and stablecoins being developed by fintech firms Robinhood and Revolut. Q4: What could be the implications for users of stablecoins? A4: For users, increased competition could lead to more innovative features, potentially lower fees, and better services. However, it also means a greater need for due diligence to assess the stability and reliability of various stablecoins, especially if some struggle in a crowded market. Q5: How can the stablecoin market avoid a zero-sum outcome? A5: According to JPMorgan, avoiding a zero-sum outcome requires significant expansion of the broader cryptocurrency market. This means attracting new capital and users into the entire crypto ecosystem, thereby growing the ‘pie’ rather than just re-dividing existing slices. Did JPMorgan’s warning about the stablecoin market catch your attention? Share this crucial insight with your network and join the conversation about the future of digital assets. Your thoughts and perspectives are invaluable! To learn more about the latest stablecoin market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market institutional adoption. This post Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:45