A newly disclosed software flaw in the Bitcoin staking protocol Babylon could allow malicious validators to interfere with parts of the network’s consensus processA newly disclosed software flaw in the Bitcoin staking protocol Babylon could allow malicious validators to interfere with parts of the network’s consensus process

Flaw Found in Bitcoin Staking Protocol Babylon Could Disrupt Consensus

2026/01/09 22:56
3 min read

A newly disclosed software flaw in the Bitcoin staking protocol Babylon could allow malicious validators to interfere with parts of the network’s consensus process, potentially slowing block production during critical periods, according to developers familiar with the issue.

Key Takeaways:

  • A flaw in Babylon’s BLS vote extension lets malicious validators omit block hash data, risking consensus failures at epoch boundaries.
  • The bug could trigger validator crashes and slow block production if exploited by multiple participants.
  • While not yet exploited, the vulnerability raises security concerns as Babylon’s Bitcoin staking adoption grows.

The vulnerability affects Babylon’s block signature mechanism, known as the BLS vote extension, which is designed to prove that validators have agreed on a specific block.

The issue was outlined in a GitHub disclosure published Thursday, which warned that the flaw could be exploited around epoch boundaries, a sensitive phase in the network’s consensus cycle.

Missing Block Hash Field Creates Validation Risk in Babylon

At the core of the problem is the block hash field, which tells validators which block they are actually voting on.

Under the current implementation, malicious validators can intentionally omit this field when submitting their vote extension.

While the vote may still be processed, the missing data can trigger failures in downstream validation checks.

Developers noted that this behavior could cause validator crashes during consensus-critical operations, particularly at epoch transitions.

If multiple validators were affected at the same time, the disruption could slow the creation of new blocks, temporarily reducing network throughput.

The flaw was identified by a pseudonymous contributor known as GrumpyLaurie55348, who described how the protocol dereferences a nil pointer in key verification paths when the block hash is missing.

This can result in runtime panics during both vote verification and proposal validation, creating a potential attack vector if the issue remains unpatched.

While there is no evidence the vulnerability has been exploited in the wild, developers cautioned that the risk increases as Babylon gains wider adoption.

Babylon had not publicly commented on the disclosure by the time of publication.

The timing of the bug report comes as Babylon continues to position itself as a major player in Bitcoin-based decentralized finance.

The protocol aims to introduce native Bitcoin staking, allowing holders of Bitcoin to earn yield without relying on wrapped assets or custodial bridges.

Bitcoin DeFi, often referred to as BTCFi, has gained traction since the introduction of new tooling during the 2024 Bitcoin halving, expanding the range of financial applications that can be built directly on the Bitcoin network.

a16z Crypto Backs Babylon With $15M Investment

Babylon’s momentum has been reinforced by recent institutional backing.

On Wednesday, a16z Crypto invested $15 million in the project through the purchase of its native BABY tokens, providing additional funding for the development of Bitcoin-native DeFi infrastructure.

a16z Crypto is the digital asset arm of Andreessen Horowitz.

Earlier in December, Babylon also partnered with Aave Labs to bring Bitcoin-backed lending to Aave v4.

The collaboration aims to allow BTC to be used as collateral without wrappers or custodians, with testing expected in early 2026 and a broader launch planned for April.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18