The post Trading Platforms Risk $180M Yearly as Users Flee to Onchain Rivals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Felix Pinkston Jan 12, 2026 23:46 FireblocksThe post Trading Platforms Risk $180M Yearly as Users Flee to Onchain Rivals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Felix Pinkston Jan 12, 2026 23:46 Fireblocks

Trading Platforms Risk $180M Yearly as Users Flee to Onchain Rivals



Felix Pinkston
Jan 12, 2026 23:46

Fireblocks warns retail trading apps are losing 15% of users to competing platforms. Embedded wallets offer a path to recapture onchain trading activity.

Retail trading platforms are hemorrhaging users to onchain competitors, with an estimated 15% of active traders conducting business elsewhere each month, according to new analysis from Fireblocks.

The wallet infrastructure provider calculates this leakage could cost a platform with 2 million active users roughly $180 million annually in lost revenue—assuming $50 in monthly fees per user. Once those habits form on competing apps, they rarely return.

The Structural Problem

Traditional trading platforms face a fundamental speed disadvantage. Adding new assets requires custody decisions, legal reviews, chain-specific integrations, and lengthy approval cycles. Onchain-native platforms? They can enable new assets in days, sometimes hours.

“When a new market opens—whether a prediction market, a new perpetual contract, or a tokenized asset—users don’t wait,” Fireblocks notes. “They open a second app.”

The timing matters. Onchain derivatives already process billions in daily volume. Prediction markets have reached multi-billion-dollar annual volumes. Tokenized treasury products and credit instruments are live and trading.

Fireblocks Pushes Embedded Wallet Solution

The company’s pitch centers on embedded wallets—crypto wallets integrated directly into existing applications rather than requiring separate downloads. Users authenticate through familiar methods like email or social login, with the blockchain complexity hidden entirely.

These wallets typically use Multi-Party Computation or account abstraction to remain non-custodial while eliminating seed phrase management. Gasless transactions and cross-chain execution happen behind the scenes.

Fireblocks recently strengthened its position in this space. On January 7, the company acquired TRES, positioning the combined entity as what it calls “the first complete operating system for digital assets.” The firm already powers wallet infrastructure for major players including Kraken.

Historical Precedent

Fireblocks draws parallels to previous industry disruptions. Online trading platforms crushed phone-based brokers in the late 1990s despite incumbent resistance. Commission-free trading was dismissed as unsustainable until it became standard, forcing acquisitions across the sector.

The pattern: when access costs drop dramatically, platforms that move slowly lose permanently. Regulation provided temporary protection in previous cycles but proved insufficient as a long-term moat.

What This Means for Traders

For users, embedded wallets promise simpler access to emerging onchain markets without managing separate apps or understanding blockchain mechanics. For platforms, it’s a defensive play—keep trading activity in-house rather than watching it migrate to crypto-native competitors.

The broader trend is clear: retail access to perpetual futures, prediction markets, and tokenized securities is expanding rapidly. Platforms that can’t match that speed face a choice between adapting their infrastructure or accepting permanent wallet-share erosion.

Whether embedded wallets deliver on their promise remains to be seen, but the competitive pressure driving their adoption isn’t theoretical—it’s already showing up in user behavior and platform revenue.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/trading-platforms-risk-180m-yearly-users-flee-onchain-rivals

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0.01219
$0.01219$0.01219
-6.37%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 13, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 13, 2026

The crypto market is trading slightly higher today, with total cryptocurrency market capitalization rising by around 1.7% over the past 24 hours to approximately
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/13 22:26
After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

After the interest rate cut, how far can the institutional bull market go?

The dominant force in this cycle comes from institutions. The four major cryptocurrencies, BTC, ETH, SOL, and BNB, have all hit new highs, but only BTC and BNB have continued to rise by over 40% since breaking through their all-time highs. SOL achieved a breakout earlier this year thanks to Trump's coin launch, while ETH experienced a revaluation mid-year driven by DAT buying, but neither has yet reached a new high. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates last night. How far can this round of institutional-led market trends go? 1. The institutional configuration logic of the three major currencies The positioning of crypto assets directly determines their long-term value, and different positioning corresponds to different institutional configuration logic. Bitcoin: The anti-inflation property of digital gold Positioned as "digital gold," its long-term logic is strongly tied to the fiat currency inflation cycle. Data shows that its market capitalization growth is synchronized with Global M2 and negatively correlated with the US dollar index. Its core value lies in its "inflation resistance" and value preservation and appreciation, making it a fundamental target for institutional investment. Ethereum: The Institutional Narrative Dividend of the World Computer Positioned as the "World Computer," although the foundation's "Layer 2 scaling" narrative has failed to gain traction in the capital market, its stable system, with 10 years of zero downtime, has capitalized on the development of institutional narratives such as US dollar stablecoins, RWAs, and the tokenization of US stocks. It has shrugged off the collapse of the Web3 narrative, and with the crucial push from DAT, has achieved a revaluation of its market capitalization. Ethereum, with its stability and security, will become the settlement network for institutional applications. Solana: The Active Advantage of Online Capital Markets Positioned as an "Internet Capital Market," Solana (ICM) stands for on-chain asset issuance, trading, and clearing. It has experienced a resurgence following the collapse of FTX. Year-to-date, it accounts for 46% of on-chain trading volume, with over 3 million daily active users year-round, making it the most active blockchain network. Solana, with its superior performance and high liquidity, will be the catalyst for the crypto-native on-chain trading ecosystem. The three platforms have distinct positioning, leading to different institutional investment logic. Traditional financial institutions first understand the value of Bitcoin, then consider developing their institutional business based on Ethereum, and finally, perhaps recognize the value of on-chain transactions. This is a typical path: question, understand, and become a part of it. Second, institutional holdings of the three major currencies show gradient differences The institutional holdings data of BTC, ETH, and SOL show obvious gradient differences, which also reflects the degree and rhythm of institutions' recognition of these three projects. Chart by: IOBC Capital From the comparison, we can see that institutional holdings of BTC and ETH account for > 18% of the circulating supply; SOL currently only accounts for 9.5%, and there may be room for replenishment. 3. SOL DAT: New Trends in Crypto Concept Stocks In the past month or so, 18 SOL DAT companies have come onto the scene, directly pushing SOL up by more than 50% from its August low. The louder SOL DAT company: Chart by: IOBC Capital Among the existing SOL DAT companies, Forward Industries, led by Multicoin Capital founder Kyle Samani, may become the SOL DAT leader. Unlike BTC DAT, which simply hoards coins, many SOL DAT companies will build their own Solana Validators, so that this is not limited to the "NAV game". Instead of simply waiting for token appreciation, they will continue to obtain cash flow income through the Validator business. This strategy is equivalent to "hoarding coins + mining", which is both long-term and profitable in the short term. 4. Crypto Concept Stocks: A Mapping of Capital Market Betting Crypto concept stocks are a new bridge between traditional capital and the crypto market. The degree of recognition of various Crypto businesses by the traditional financial market is also reflected in the stock price performance of crypto concept stocks. Chart by: IOBC Capital Looking back at the crypto stocks that have seen significant gains this round, we can see two common characteristics: 1. Only by betting big can a valuation reassessment be achieved. There are 189 publicly listed companies holding BTC, but only 30 hold 70% of their stock market capitalization, and only 12 hold more than 10,000 BTC—and these 12 have seen significant gains. A similar pattern is observed among listed ETH DATs. A superficial DAT strategy can only cause short-term stock price fluctuations and cannot substantially boost stock market capitalization or liquidity. 2. Business synergy can amplify commercial value. Transforming a single-point business into a multifaceted industry chain layout can amplify commercial value. For example, Robinhood, through its expansion into cryptocurrency trading, real-world asset trading (RRE), and participation in the USDG stablecoin, has formed a closed-loop business cycle for capital flow, leading to record highs in its stock price. Conversely, while Trump Media has also invested heavily in crypto (holding BTC, applying for an ETH ETF, and issuing tokens like Trump, Melania, and WLFI), the lack of synergy between its businesses has ultimately led to a lackluster market response to both its stock and its token. Ending The project philosophies of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana correspond to three instincts of human beings when facing the future: survival, order, and flow.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 19:00