Shlomo Kramer suggests limiting First Amendment to tackle AI-driven misinformation, sparking debate.Shlomo Kramer suggests limiting First Amendment to tackle AI-driven misinformation, sparking debate.

Shlomo Kramer Advocates Limiting First Amendment on CNBC

What to Know:
  • Shlomo Kramer calls for limiting First Amendment on CNBC.
  • Kramer’s remarks spark significant online debate.
  • Conversation focuses on managing AI-driven misinformation.

Shlomo Kramer, CEO of Cato Networks, suggested limiting First Amendment rights to combat AI-driven cyber threats, in a CNBC interview, sparking controversy on free speech restrictions.

Kramer’s proposal underscores tensions between cybersecurity and free speech, igniting political debates highlighting privacy concerns, but lacks crypto industry connection or market impact evidence.

On CNBC’s “Money Movers,” Shlomo Kramer discussed the need to curtail First Amendment protections to combat AI-related misinformation, asserting government control over social media platforms.

Kramer’s stance has drawn criticism from public figures, highlighting ongoing tension between free speech and cybersecurity policies.

Shlomo Kramer Proposes First Amendment Constraints on CNBC

In an interview on CNBC, Shlomo Kramer, CEO of Cato Networks, highlighted the dangers of AI-driven misinformation. Kramer suggested limiting First Amendment protections as a solution to this growing concern.

The discussion emphasized the role of social media platforms in spreading misinformation. Kramer proposed government intervention as essential, stressing the balance between security and freedom of speech.

Politicians React Strongly Against Kramer’s Free Speech Proposal

Kramer’s comments prompted immediate backlash from political figures, who viewed this as a threat to free speech. Critics argued the need for protection against censorship and governmental overreach.

Kramer’s proposal underscored the ongoing debate over free speech vs. security. Public figures such as Rep. Matt Gaetz and Sen. Mike Lee responded strongly, opposing any limits to First Amendment rights.

Free Speech vs. Security: A Historical Debate

Similar debates have arisen in the past regarding government intervention in free speech. The contrast remains between protecting citizens and maintaining democratic principles.

Experts note that legal challenges could arise if government controls are increased. Historically, attempts to limit speech have faced significant public and legal pushbacks, predicting a contentious legal climate. For reference, a Starbird House Judiciary Committee Report provides insights into previous challenges and discussions.

Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38