The post Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Injective will move forward with its aggressiveThe post Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Injective will move forward with its aggressive

Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ?

Injective will move forward with its aggressive deflationary plan. The proposal, dubbed “supply squeeze,” received unanimous approval, with 99.89% voting in favor, the blockchain said in a statement. 

The Layer 1 chain added

The proposal was first floated on the 16th of January and aimed to offer a complementary but fixed solution to the INJ token’s community buyback program. 

According to the proposal, IIP-617, INJ’s total supply reduction rate would be doubled. In other words, the supply reduction would be increased by 100% as part of a “structural upgrade to INJ tokenomics.”

For the unfamiliar, Injective [INJ] debuted with a total supply of 100,000,000 tokens and serves as the governance token for the Injective ecosystem.

Injective’s annual inflation rate or emissions distributed as staking rewards are dynamic and fluctuate between 5% and 10% based on an 85% staking ratio. 

In the past, the chain’s deflationary plan involved using collected fees to drive token buybacks. Over 6.8 million INJ tokens have been removed from supply via the buyback program.

But the new plan takes it a notch higher. It will cut emissions by half and increase buybacks to tighten supply. 

Will the deflation plan boost INJ’s outlook?

However, the results and views on buyback programs across various chains, such as Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pump.fun, and Jupiter [JUP], have been mixed.

Some bill it as a “token value accrual,” while others, like Jupiter, see it as a waste of resources if the token’s price doesn’t rally. 

Whether INJ’s double approach will clear Jupiter’s doubts remains unclear. 

In the meantime, INJ tracked broader market sentiment rather than the bullish update.

It rallied 4% after the update but erased some of those gains at the time of writing as Bitcoin [BTC] dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Europe. 

Source: INJ/USDT, TradingView

After slipping below $5, INJ briefly dropped to December lows near $4.4 and may retest support or drop to $4.42 if pressure persists. 

Besides, the overall demand on the Futures market remained muted.

Over the past week, Futures CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta), or demand for INJ on the Futures market, became increasingly negative from the 15th of January and dipped even lower despite the ‘supply squeeze’ update. 

Source: Velo

In fact, even the Open Interest (OI) remained unchanged near $25 million despite the bullish tokenomics update. 

Taken together, these data sets showed that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive INJ development. It remains to be seen whether the price will catch up later. 


Final Thoughts

  • Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions, currently 5%-10%, in half.
  • Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% bounce after the positive update.
Next: TROVE token’s 97% wipeout: From $11.5 mln presale to rug-pull accusations

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/injectives-supply-squeeze-clears-with-99-vote-whats-next-for-inj/

Market Opportunity
Injective Logo
Injective Price(INJ)
$4,676
$4,676$4,676
-0,14%
USD
Injective (INJ) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups

Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups

The post Pump Fun Fund Launches $3M Hackathon: Market-Driven Startups appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a bid to evolve beyond its roots as a memecoin launchpad
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 20:06
WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon

WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon

The post WhatsApp Web to get group voice and video calls soon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WhatsApp is developing voice and video calling features for group
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 20:13
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28