BitcoinWorld
Crypto Winter Debunked: Tiger Research Reveals Why This Downturn Differs
Singapore, April 2025 – A new analysis from Tiger Research challenges the pervasive narrative labeling the current market correction as a ‘crypto winter,’ arguing the downturn stems from external macroeconomic pressures rather than an internal collapse of trust within the blockchain ecosystem. This crucial distinction, detailed in their report “2026 Is It Crypto Winter Now? Market Changes After Regulation,” suggests the path to recovery may follow a different, potentially faster trajectory than previous prolonged bear markets. Consequently, investors and builders must understand these nuanced drivers to navigate the evolving landscape effectively.
Historically, the term ‘crypto winter’ describes a prolonged bear market characterized by severe price declines, evaporating liquidity, and a fundamental crisis of confidence within the cryptocurrency industry itself. Tiger Research’s analysis identifies a consistent three-phase pattern behind past winters. First, a major internal incident triggers the collapse. For example, the 2014 winter followed the Mt. Gox exchange hack, the 2018 downturn came after the ICO bubble burst, and the 2022 freeze was precipitated by the cascading failures of entities like Terra/Luna, Celsius, and FTX.
Second, these events directly cause a catastrophic loss of trust among users, investors, and developers. Finally, a significant talent and capital exodus from the space occurs, stalling innovation. The current environment, while challenging, shows key deviations from this historical script. Market data from CoinGecko and Glassnode indicates that developer activity on major protocols like Ethereum and Solana remains robust, and institutional on-chain metrics have not shown the same wholesale retreat witnessed in late 2022.
The report pinpoints the October 10, 2024, cross-asset liquidation event as a critical catalyst for the recent downturn. Unlike past triggers, this was not a crypto-native failure. Instead, a sudden spike in U.S. Treasury yields and a sharp strengthening of the U.S. dollar triggered massive, automated liquidations across leveraged positions in traditional and digital asset markets simultaneously. This created a violent liquidity crunch that spilled over into cryptocurrencies.
“The October event was a macroeconomic shock, not a blockchain failure,” the report states. This distinction is vital because it implies the core infrastructure of decentralized finance (DeFi) and major Layer-1 networks remained operationally sound. The contagion was financial, not technological. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks, particularly in regions like the EU with MiCA and Hong Kong with its new licensing regime, provided clearer guardrails that prevented the kind of opaque, systemic implosion seen with FTX.
Analysts highlight that improving regulatory clarity, while initially perceived as a headwind, is now laying the groundwork for sustainable growth. Clear rules reduce existential uncertainty for institutional participants. The report notes increased filing activity for spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in major jurisdictions and growing compliance-focused hiring at crypto firms as evidence of this maturation phase. This environment contrasts sharply with the regulatory vacuum that allowed previous speculative excesses to build unchecked.
Tiger Research outlines several converging factors that could catalyze the next major market upswing. The firm emphasizes these conditions differ from the blanket euphoria of past cycles.
The table below contrasts the drivers of past cycles with the anticipated drivers of the next:
| Past Bull Run Drivers | Next Bull Run Drivers (Projected) |
|---|---|
| Retail speculation & ICO mania | Institutional adoption via ETFs |
| Narrative-driven hype (e.g., “Web3”) | Utility-driven adoption (e.g., RWAs, DePIN) |
| Low institutional participation | High institutional infrastructure |
| Absence of clear regulation | Operation within defined regulatory frameworks |
A sobering conclusion from Tiger Research is the unlikelihood of a return to a ‘crypto season’ where virtually all assets appreciate indiscriminately. The next phase will likely be selective. Assets with clear utility, sustainable tokenomics, and robust communities may outperform. Conversely, projects without tangible use cases or sound fundamentals may not recover. This mirrors maturation seen in other technology sectors, where winners consolidate market share after an initial period of broad experimentation. Performance divergence is already evident, with certain Layer-1 tokens and DeFi blue chips showing relative resilience compared to more speculative memecoins and narrative-driven projects.
Tiger Research’s analysis provides a crucial framework for understanding the current crypto downturn. By distinguishing an externally-triggered correction from an internal crisis of confidence, the report refutes the simplistic ‘crypto winter’ label. The evolving landscape, shaped by regulatory clarity and macroeconomic forces, points toward a more mature, albeit selective, growth phase. For market participants, this underscores the importance of fundamental analysis and a focus on long-term value creation over short-term speculation. The path forward, while challenging, is being paved by infrastructure and regulatory developments that were absent in previous cycles.
Q1: What exactly defines a ‘crypto winter’ according to Tiger Research?
Tiger Research defines a true crypto winter as a prolonged bear market triggered by an internal industry collapse (like a major hack or bankruptcy), leading to a catastrophic loss of trust and a mass exodus of talent and capital from the sector.
Q2: Why does the firm say the current downturn is different?
The primary trigger for the current downturn was the external, macroeconomic October 10 liquidation event, not a failure within the crypto industry’s core infrastructure or trust model. Regulatory frameworks also provided more stability than in past crises.
Q3: What are the key conditions needed for the next bull run?
The report highlights three conditions: the emergence of a new, utility-focused ‘killer use case’ (like tokenized assets), a shift in the macroeconomic environment to favor risk assets (e.g., lower interest rates), and the maturation of institutional-grade market infrastructure.
Q4: Will all cryptocurrencies rise in the next bull run?
No. Tiger Research concludes that a ‘crypto season’ of universal gains is unlikely. The next phase will be selective, favoring assets with strong fundamentals, clear utility, and sustainable models, while weaker projects may not recover.
Q5: How is regulatory clarity affecting the market?
While initially seen as restrictive, clearer regulations are reducing long-term uncertainty. This is encouraging institutional participation through compliant products like ETFs and is helping to build a more stable foundation for growth, preventing the kind of opaque collapses seen in the past.
This post Crypto Winter Debunked: Tiger Research Reveals Why This Downturn Differs first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

