Markets Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail Vitalik Buterin blasts Ethereum 'copypasta' Markets Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail Vitalik Buterin blasts Ethereum 'copypasta'

Vitalik Buterin blasts Ethereum 'copypasta' L2 chains, says the rollup excuse is fading

2026/02/05 18:31
3 min read
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

Vitalik Buterin blasts Ethereum 'copypasta' L2 chains, says the rollup excuse is fading

Ethereum’s co-founder says the ecosystem has grown too comfortable shipping lookalike networks, arguing that scaling alone is no longer a compelling reason to exist.

By Shaurya Malwa
Updated Feb 5, 2026, 11:45 a.m. Published Feb 5, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
Make us preferred on Google

What to know:

  • Vitalik Buterin criticized the proliferation of copycat Ethereum layer-2 networks, arguing that many simply replicate existing EVM chains with standard bridges instead of innovating.
  • He warned that some projects overstate their connection to Ethereum, saying that marketing "vibes" should match how closely a chain is actually integrated with Ethereum's core infrastructure.
  • Buterin endorsed two promising models for future development: tightly coupled app-specific systems that rely on Ethereum for key functions, and institutional or application-driven chains that post cryptographic proofs or state commitments back to Ethereum.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin doubled down on his critique of the layer-2 ecosystem, warning that the industry has fallen into a pattern of copying itself rather than building genuinely new infrastructure, in a post on X on Thursday.

Buterin said that building “yet another EVM chain with an optimistic bridge and a one-week delay” has become the blockchain equivalent of forking Compound governance - referring to a habit of reusing familiar crypto designs rather than experimenting with new ideas.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Sign me up

The result, he argued, is an ecosystem that has optimized for comfort over creativity.

“We don’t need more copypasta EVM chains,” Buterin wrote, adding that Ethereum itself is scaling and will soon provide far more blockspace than it does today. While not infinite, that capacity weakens the long-standing justification for rollups that exist mainly to be “Ethereum but cheaper.”

Buterin was particularly critical of projects that market themselves as deeply connected to Ethereum while functioning largely as standalone networks. Having a bridge, he said, does not automatically make a chain part of Ethereum’s core architecture.

“Vibes need to match substance,” he wrote, arguing that the way projects present themselves publicly should reflect how tightly they are actually coupled to Ethereum in practice.

Buterin was, however, careful not to dismiss layer-2s outright. Instead, he outlined two directions he believes remain compelling.

One is tightly integrated “app-specific” systems, where Ethereum remains a first-class component for settlement, accounts or verification, while execution happens elsewhere.

The other path is what he described as institutional or application-driven chains that publish cryptographic proofs or state commitments to Ethereum. These systems are not Ethereum, Buterin said, but they can still advance similar goals around transparency and verifiability.

The message sharpens a debate that has been building for months as Ethereum fees stay low and base-layer throughput improves.

Buterin's comments earlier this week sparked reactions across the layer-2 ecosystem.

Arbitrum’s Steven Goldfeder said the network should be seen as a close ally of Ethereum, not Ethereum itself, while Base head Jesse Pollak argued rollups must offer more than cheaper fees as the base layer improves.

Others, including Polygon leadership, framed Buterin’s critique as a push for clearer positioning rather than an existential threat, urging L2s to define what unique value they actually bring.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16