The post SYRUP Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SYRUP is trading in a strong downtrend, with the current price level at 0.25$ positionedThe post SYRUP Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SYRUP is trading in a strong downtrend, with the current price level at 0.25$ positioned

SYRUP Technical Analysis Feb 6

SYRUP is trading in a strong downtrend, with the current price level at 0.25$ positioned below the EMA20, giving bearish signals. Although RSI is at 29.85 in the oversold region, MACD shows a negative histogram with weak momentum; a break below the critical support at 0.2352$ could trigger downside targets.

Executive Summary

SYRUP’s technical chart shows a clear downtrend as of February 6, 2026. The price is trading at 0.25$ with a 13.63% drop in the last 24 hours, supported by volume of 28.94M$. Supertrend is bearish, price below EMA20 (0.31$); RSI at 29.85 signals oversold but MACD is bearish. Critical support at 0.2352$ (strength score 75/100), resistances at 0.2660$ (72/100) and 0.2992$ (60/100). Bitcoin’s downtrend increases risk for altcoins; short-term bearish pressure dominates, but rebound potential from oversold conditions is limited. Risk/reward ratio favors bearish targets; follow SYRUP Spot Analysis for spot, SYRUP Futures Analysis for futures.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

SYRUP shows a clear downtrend across higher timeframes (1D, 3D, 1W). Daily chart continues forming lower highs and lower lows, with the 13.63% loss in the last 24 hours reinforcing this structure. Supertrend indicator gives bearish signal, dynamic resistance positioned at 0.34$. Price remaining below EMA20 (0.31$) confirms short-term bearish momentum. Weekly timeframe shows strong trend continuity, no higher low formation observed. Overall structure deteriorated with rejection of recent highs around 0.30$; this indicates dominance of selling pressure.

Structural Levels

Multi-timeframe analysis identified 10 strong levels: 1D with 1 support/2 resistances, 3D with 2 supports/1 resistance, 1W with 3 supports/3 resistances. Main structural supports at 0.2352$ (previous swing low, strong reaction expected), followed by psychological 0.20$ and cluster level 0.15$. Resistances at 0.2660$ (short-term pivot), 0.2992$ (EMA20 convergence), and 0.34$ Supertrend line. These levels reflect market structure fragility; support break could trigger aggressive downside.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 29.85 points to oversold region, carrying short-term rebound potential but high ‘bearish divergence’ risk due to downtrend. MACD histogram negative and below signal line, confirming bearish crossover. Selling signals dominate across momentum indicators; Stochastic in 20s oversold but no upward crossover. This confluence shows momentum not exhausted, downside may continue.

Trend Indicators

EMA clusters (EMA20: 0.31$, EMA50: 0.35$, EMA200: 0.42$) aligned below price; death cross completed. Supertrend bearish, trailing stop forming resistance at 0.34$. Price below Ichimoku cloud, Tenkan-Kijun cross downward. All trend indicators show bearish confluence, emphasizing need for strong catalyst for structural change.

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

Support zone at 0.2352$ (75/100 score) is the most critical level; hold here offers hope for oversold rebound but break could lead to 0.20$. Medium-term supports in 0.18$-0.20$ range overlap Fibonacci retracement 61.8%. Resistances at 0.2660$ (72/100) first test point, if fails then 0.2992$ (60/100) targeted. Upper resistance 0.34$ Supertrend and 0.4472$ bullish target (low score 25/100). Level scores show supports stronger; risk biased downward.

Volume and Market Participation

Volume in last 24 hours at 28.94M$ high, selling volume dominant supporting downside. Volume Profile POC (Point of Control) around 0.28$, volume gap forming below price confirming bearish continuation. OBV (On-Balance Volume) shows negative divergence, buyer participation weak. Increasing volume downside may signal institutional selling; low-volume rebounds could be fakeouts.

Risk Assessment

From current 0.25$ level, bearish target 0.0685$ (risk: -72.6%, score 20/100), bullish target 0.4472$ (reward: +78.88%, score 25/100). Risk/reward ratio favors shorts at 1:1.08, longs at 1:1.09 reverse. Main risks: BTC downside correlation (high beta), RSI oversold sharp reversal, low liquidity. Volatility high (13+% daily), stop-loss suggestion: longs below 0.2352$, shorts above 0.2660$. Overall risk profile bearish, capital allocation should not exceed 2-3%.

Bitcoin Correlation

SYRUP highly correlated with BTC (0.85+%); BTC at 64,724$ and -9.22% down, Supertrend bearish. BTC supports 62,910$, 60,000$, 45,967$; break creates cascade effect on altcoins. Resistances 65,881$, 71,041$. BTC dominance increase adds pressure on SYRUP; if BTC stays below 60K, SYRUP can reach bearish targets. Follow: BTC clearance above 65K supports SYRUP rebound.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

SYRUP’s technical chart is filled with comprehensive bearish signals: downtrend, bearish indicator confluence, critical support approach. Short-term 0.2352$ test expected; if holds probe to 0.2660$, if breaks 0.0685$ target. Long-term requires BTC recovery, currently short-biased strategy recommended. Oversold conditions allow spite bounce but no structural change. Investors should integrate spot/futures analyses; patient shorts or support breakout wait optimal. This holistic view provides full picture for decision-makers.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/syrup-comprehensive-technical-analysis-february-6-2026-detailed-review

Market Opportunity
Maple Finance Logo
Maple Finance Price(SYRUP)
$0.27647
$0.27647$0.27647
+1.90%
USD
Maple Finance (SYRUP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16