How did Malaysia set the scene for the Philippines ASEAN chair and deal with the range of challenges?How did Malaysia set the scene for the Philippines ASEAN chair and deal with the range of challenges?

Lookback on Malaysia’s ASEAN chairmanship: Restraint over reform in a year of crises

2026/02/07 12:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

ASEAN newsrooms have joined together to provide an initial assessment of the progress and challenges faced by ASEAN in 2026 under the chairmanship of the Philippines.

In this series, regional newsrooms Rappler, Mizzima, Kiripost, and Malaysiakini delve into the key issues facing this regional body.


KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia – Malaysia’s chairmanship of ASEAN in 2025 unfolded amid intensifying great-power rivalry, the Myanmar crisis, South China Sea disputes, and economic uncertainty — a convergence that pushed Kuala Lumpur toward crisis containment rather than ambitious reform.

Within such constraints, however, analysts argue Malaysia performed credibly, particularly in keeping ASEAN-led mechanisms functional — the ASEAN Regional Forum remained active, and Malaysia successfully mediated the Thailand-Cambodia border dispute.

‘Diplomatic prowess’

For Institute of Strategic & International Studies (ISIS) analyst Izzah Khairina Ibrahim, Malaysia’s chairmanship was a case study in diplomatic prowess and regional leadership. 

The large turnout at the ASEAN Summit, she said, reflected not only Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s personal diplomacy, but also on Malaysia’s long-standing, principled, and non-aligned foreign policy shaped by its dependence on external market access and global stability.

This approach translated into initiatives that strengthened geo-economic diversification, particularly the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).

Myanmar 5PC ‘ineffective’

While Malaysia maintained restraint on the South China Sea issue, preventing deeper internal division, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman’s assistant professor of international relations Liew Wui Chern saw ASEAN’s role in managing the Myanmar crisis as “diplomatic, albeit with limited impact.” 

He highlighted that the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus (5PC) remained ineffective in tackling deeper concerns, with the bloc continuing to release declaratory statements while lacking enforcement mechanisms.

Izzah noted that the lack of such mechanisms, coupled with consensus-based decision-making, limited more decisive action, raising broader concerns about ASEAN’s cohesion and effectiveness.

Manila now assumes the chairmanship, inheriting these same structural constraints alongside mounting geopolitical pressures.

The unresolved Myanmar crisis remains a central challenge, with continued political instability and little prospect of meaningful progress under existing mechanisms.

South China Sea tensions are expected to weigh even more heavily on the agenda, particularly as Manila–Beijing relations deteriorate.

Minilateral security groupings muddy the waters

Complicating the landscape further is the growing prominence of minilateral security groupings — Bangkok, Manila, and Singapore have strengthened ties with the United States, while Cambodia has aligned more closely with China. These pressures test ASEAN’s internal unity and challenge the long-standing neutrality of members like Malaysia and Singapore as divergent alignments deepen.

Liew warned that Manila may be tempted to elevate ASEAN on the global stage, especially on the South China Sea issue, but over-politicization risks splitting the bloc internally.

Malaysia’s experience, he argued, showed that “trying to do less can sometimes preserve more.” ASEAN works best as a stabilizer — one that maintains dialogue and manages expectations — rather than a resolver of disputes.

Izzah offered similar counsel: the Philippines should build on, rather than sideline, the work of previous chairs, particularly the progress made through the Malaysian special envoy on Myanmar.

The Philippines could also leverage individual members’ strengths in managing extra-regional powers and potential crises, she argued, as complements to existing regional mechanisms.

The difficulties in securing a ceasefire despite the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accord, she added, serve as a reminder that matters of strategic importance cannot be avoided for fear of national sensitivities. – Rappler.com

ALSO IN THIS SERIES
  • Philippines takes ASEAN helm amid stormy seas
  • Myanmar’s opposition fears ASEAN betrayal 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

Trade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDT

Trade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDTTrade GOLD, Share 1,000,000 USDT

0 fees, up to 1,000x leverage, deep liquidity