The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US… The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US…

MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case

The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence.

According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case. 

The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court.

Search history is not evidence, defense attest

According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation.

Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty. 

“For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.”

Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.” 

“The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent. 

MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says

According to a US Department of Justice statement on the case, the brothers are accused of exploiting Ethereum’s Maximal Extractible Value (MEV) boost system in April 2023. They allegedly intercepted private transactions and manipulated them to siphon $25 million in just 12 seconds.

“And once they put their plan into action, their heist only took 12 seconds to complete,” US Attorney Damian Williams mentioned in his press briefing.

Authorities say the brothers targeted Ethereum traders by altering pending transactions, allowing them to divert the crypto funds before the trades were finalized. Court filings further reveal that the pair retained legal counsel immediately after being contacted by anonymous “sandwich attackers” who demanded the return of the stolen funds.

Anton was detained in Boston, while James was booked in New York during their arrest in May last year. In the afternoon of their indictment, the former appeared before US Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson in Massachusetts. James faced US Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo in the Southern District of New York.

“As alleged in today’s indictment, the Peraire-Bueno brothers stole $25 million in Ethereum cryptocurrency through a technologically sophisticated, cutting-edge scheme they plotted for months and executed in seconds,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told reporters at the time of their indictment.

Defense files other motions to scrap evidence

The Peraire-Bueno brothers also moved to exclude several other pieces of evidence. They asked the court to block prosecutors from introducing news articles that contain “inflammatory descriptions” of them as inadmissible hearsay.

Motion to exclude Twitter screenshot as evidence. Source: CourtListener.

Moreover, they sought to prevent the government from using a screenshot from X that allegedly shows a “false signature.” The screenshot was originally posted by pseudonymous Paradigm crypto researcher “Samczsun.” Defense attorneys are trying to convince the court that prosecutors cannot properly authenticate the image, and that they should admit it would be prejudicial.

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/brothers-google-searches-in-25m-crypto-fcase/

Market Opportunity
Gravity Logo
Gravity Price(G)
$0,004789
$0,004789$0,004789
-1,33%
USD
Gravity (G) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut

PANews reported on September 18th, according to the Securities Times, that at 2:00 AM Beijing time on September 18th, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point interest rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate from 4.25%-4.50% to 4.00%-4.25%, in line with market expectations. The Fed's interest rate announcement triggered a sharp market reaction, with the three major US stock indices rising briefly before quickly plunging. The US dollar index plummeted, briefly hitting a new low since 2025, before rebounding sharply, turning a decline into an upward trend. The sharp market volatility was closely tied to the subsequent monetary policy press conference held by Federal Reserve Chairman Powell. He stated that the 50 basis point rate cut lacked broad support and that there was no need for a swift adjustment. Today's move could be viewed as a risk-management cut, suggesting the Fed will not enter a sustained cycle of rate cuts. Powell reiterated the Fed's unwavering commitment to maintaining its independence. Market participants are currently unaware of the risks to the Fed's independence. The latest published interest rate dot plot shows that the median expectation of Fed officials is to cut interest rates twice more this year (by 25 basis points each), one more than predicted in June this year. At the same time, Fed officials expect that after three rate cuts this year, there will be another 25 basis point cut in 2026 and 2027.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 06:54
Zero Knowledge Proof Kicks Off 2026 With Presale Auction Plus $5M Reward – Could This Spark Major Movement?

Zero Knowledge Proof Kicks Off 2026 With Presale Auction Plus $5M Reward – Could This Spark Major Movement?

Most crypto markets concentrate on popular names bouncing back from the latest drops, yet one presale auction grabs focus for completely different reasons. Zero
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/15 05:00
Uphold’s Massive 1.59 Billion XRP Holdings Shocks Community, CEO Reveals The Real Owners

Uphold’s Massive 1.59 Billion XRP Holdings Shocks Community, CEO Reveals The Real Owners

Uphold, a cloud-based digital financial service platform, has come under the spotlight after on-chain data confirmed that it safeguards approximately 1.59 billion XRP. According to Uphold’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Simon McLoughlin, these tokens are fully owned by customers, not the exchange itself.  Uphold Clarifies Massive XRP Holdings The crypto community was taken by surprise […]
Share
Bitcoinist2025/09/18 00:30