The post BTC, ETH Mirror 2022 Setup: Bottom Near? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BTC and ETH mirror 2022 pattern with 50W EMA loss and sharp drop, but 2025The post BTC, ETH Mirror 2022 Setup: Bottom Near? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BTC and ETH mirror 2022 pattern with 50W EMA loss and sharp drop, but 2025

BTC, ETH Mirror 2022 Setup: Bottom Near?

BTC and ETH mirror 2022 pattern with 50W EMA loss and sharp drop, but 2025–26 cycle shows faster price compression.

Bitcoin and Ethereum price charts are drawing comparisons to the 2022 market cycle, as analysts review current technical structures.

Recent data suggests both assets may be following a similar sequence, though the timeline appears compressed.

BTC and ETH Flash 2022 Setup: Is a Quick Bottom Coming?

Market analysts note that Bitcoin appears to be tracking a pattern seen in 2022.

The structure shows a market top followed by a loss of the 50-week exponential moving average.

After that breakdown, price action accelerated to the downside before forming a bottom.

Ethereum is showing a comparable formation on higher time frames. Analysts report that ETH also lost its 50-week EMA after peaking.

The sequence of events aligns with the prior cycle, including a sharp corrective phase.

One market observer said the setup is not a “perfect fractal,” but the sequence “lines up quite clean.”

The pattern includes a top, a key moving average loss, and an aggressive decline. Such technical formations often attract attention from traders monitoring historical trends.

50-Week EMA Breakdown and Market Structure

The 50-week EMA is widely used as a long-term trend indicator. When price moves below this level, it can signal weakening momentum. Both BTC and ETH have recently traded beneath this key threshold.

During the 2021–2022 cycle, the loss of the 50-week EMA preceded deeper corrections.

The same sequence appears to be unfolding again. Traders are analyzing whether this breakdown will follow a similar duration.

Technical analysts emphasize that moving averages do not predict exact outcomes. However, repeated structures can provide reference points.

The alignment between the two cycles has increased discussion across crypto trading communities.

Related Reading:  BTC, ETH, BNB, DOGE Liquidations Signal Big Move Ahead: Analysis

Faster Cycle May Lead to Faster Bottom

One key difference between the current cycle and 2021–2022 is speed. The 2025–2026 rally and topping phase developed more rapidly than the prior bull market.

Price appreciation and distribution occurred within a shorter time frame.

If the upward move was compressed, some analysts suggest the corrective phase could also be shorter.

The idea is based on time symmetry within market cycles. Faster expansions can sometimes be followed by faster contractions.

Still, no confirmation of a bottom has emerged. Bitcoin and Ethereum remain subject to broader macroeconomic and liquidity conditions.

Traders continue to monitor weekly closes, moving averages, and volume data to assess whether the pattern will complete with a quicker base formation than in 2022.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/btc-and-eth-flash-2022-setup-is-a-quick-bottom-coming/

Market Opportunity
Ethereum Logo
Ethereum Price(ETH)
$1,973.6
$1,973.6$1,973.6
+0.48%
USD
Ethereum (ETH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week

The post Strategy CEO to discuss Bitcoin with Morgan Stanley’s digital asset head next week appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy CEO Phong Le will join
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:48
Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

Stablecoin Yield ‘Effectively Off The Table’: White House Narrows Rewards Debate In Latest Meeting

The White House reportedly took the lead during the latest Crypto Council meeting, narrowing the stablecoin rewards dispute that has delayed progress in the long
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/21 15:30
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28