Litecoin sparks outrage after mocking XRP with harsh comet comparison. XRP supporters say Litecoin’s jab shows insecurity, not real strength. Heated crypto debate grows as communities clash over token dominance. Litecoin triggered a heated debate after its official account published a controversial post directly aimed at XRP. The post compared the smell of a comet to “rotten eggs, urine, burning matches, and almonds,” before suggesting that XRP tokens resembled the same unpleasant mix. According to the account, XRP creates an illusion of value by relying on a limited supply and speculation that banks are preparing to adopt it as a replacement for SWIFT. The post further ridiculed Ripple leadership with a satirical claim that “the president is sleeping with Brad Garlicmouse.” The statement quickly went viral, sparking critical reactions across the crypto community. SamTheCarpetMan highlighted that Litecoin founder Charlie Lee sold his entire holdings at the market peak in December 2017, questioning confidence in the project. In response, Litecoin wrote that critics should “now do Ripple, and its execs,” and dismissed further debate by stating, “Relax, Sparky. I’m not in the digital bank tube market. Go play that crap with XLM.” Fun fact: A comet smells like rotten eggs, urine, burning matches, and almonds. Most scientists say the closest comparison to this phenomenon on earth is the idea that tokens called XRP would be sold off to retail investors with the illusion that a digital bank drive-up tube is… — Litecoin (@litecoin) August 29, 2025 Also Read: 340,000,000 XRP in Two Weeks as Price Prepares for Breakout Strong Reactions From Crypto Community Observers also weighed in on the dispute. Tony noted that Ripple executives could potentially file a defamation or trade libel suit if the remarks were deemed competitive. El Cadejo remarked that Litecoin was being heavily ratioed in its replies, arguing that community sentiment leaned toward dumping LTC. XRP supporters defended their network, interpreting Litecoin’s post as evidence of insecurity. Pumpius claimed the attack proved “how scared they really are.” Guardians of the XRPL said the volume of criticism reflected concern, adding that XRP seeks to replace, not compete with, outdated settlement systems. XRPawn Shop argued that Litecoin had acknowledged XRP’s superiority by resorting to attacks, while SleazyWeez recalled earlier disputes between XRP and Stellar, noting that many investors shifted funds into XRP during that period. Following the backlash, Litecoin attempted to downplay the controversy. In a lighter post, the account stated, “Damn. Y’all gotta stop taking X so seriously. Go eat a Hot Pockets and I’ll see you in the morning if I’m not fired before then.” Damn. Y’all gotta stop taking X so seriously. Go eat a hot pocket and I’ll see you in the morning if I’m not fired before then. — Litecoin (@litecoin) September 1, 2025 The episode highlighted the intensity of rivalries within the crypto sector and the strong loyalty of online communities. While Litecoin’s remarks drew significant criticism, they also placed XRP at the center of market discussions, underscoring the sharp divide between competing digital assets. Also Read: Top Analyst Says Unless These 3 Things Happen, The XRP Bull Run Is Not Over – Here’s What The post Crypto War: Litecoin Takes Heavy Jab at XRP, Calls it ‘Urine’ – Here’s What’s Trending appeared first on 36Crypto. Litecoin sparks outrage after mocking XRP with harsh comet comparison. XRP supporters say Litecoin’s jab shows insecurity, not real strength. Heated crypto debate grows as communities clash over token dominance. Litecoin triggered a heated debate after its official account published a controversial post directly aimed at XRP. The post compared the smell of a comet to “rotten eggs, urine, burning matches, and almonds,” before suggesting that XRP tokens resembled the same unpleasant mix. According to the account, XRP creates an illusion of value by relying on a limited supply and speculation that banks are preparing to adopt it as a replacement for SWIFT. The post further ridiculed Ripple leadership with a satirical claim that “the president is sleeping with Brad Garlicmouse.” The statement quickly went viral, sparking critical reactions across the crypto community. SamTheCarpetMan highlighted that Litecoin founder Charlie Lee sold his entire holdings at the market peak in December 2017, questioning confidence in the project. In response, Litecoin wrote that critics should “now do Ripple, and its execs,” and dismissed further debate by stating, “Relax, Sparky. I’m not in the digital bank tube market. Go play that crap with XLM.” Fun fact: A comet smells like rotten eggs, urine, burning matches, and almonds. Most scientists say the closest comparison to this phenomenon on earth is the idea that tokens called XRP would be sold off to retail investors with the illusion that a digital bank drive-up tube is… — Litecoin (@litecoin) August 29, 2025 Also Read: 340,000,000 XRP in Two Weeks as Price Prepares for Breakout Strong Reactions From Crypto Community Observers also weighed in on the dispute. Tony noted that Ripple executives could potentially file a defamation or trade libel suit if the remarks were deemed competitive. El Cadejo remarked that Litecoin was being heavily ratioed in its replies, arguing that community sentiment leaned toward dumping LTC. XRP supporters defended their network, interpreting Litecoin’s post as evidence of insecurity. Pumpius claimed the attack proved “how scared they really are.” Guardians of the XRPL said the volume of criticism reflected concern, adding that XRP seeks to replace, not compete with, outdated settlement systems. XRPawn Shop argued that Litecoin had acknowledged XRP’s superiority by resorting to attacks, while SleazyWeez recalled earlier disputes between XRP and Stellar, noting that many investors shifted funds into XRP during that period. Following the backlash, Litecoin attempted to downplay the controversy. In a lighter post, the account stated, “Damn. Y’all gotta stop taking X so seriously. Go eat a Hot Pockets and I’ll see you in the morning if I’m not fired before then.” Damn. Y’all gotta stop taking X so seriously. Go eat a hot pocket and I’ll see you in the morning if I’m not fired before then. — Litecoin (@litecoin) September 1, 2025 The episode highlighted the intensity of rivalries within the crypto sector and the strong loyalty of online communities. While Litecoin’s remarks drew significant criticism, they also placed XRP at the center of market discussions, underscoring the sharp divide between competing digital assets. Also Read: Top Analyst Says Unless These 3 Things Happen, The XRP Bull Run Is Not Over – Here’s What The post Crypto War: Litecoin Takes Heavy Jab at XRP, Calls it ‘Urine’ – Here’s What’s Trending appeared first on 36Crypto.

Crypto War: Litecoin Takes Heavy Jab at XRP, Calls it ‘Urine’ – Here’s What’s Trending

  • Litecoin sparks outrage after mocking XRP with harsh comet comparison.
  • XRP supporters say Litecoin’s jab shows insecurity, not real strength.
  • Heated crypto debate grows as communities clash over token dominance.

Litecoin triggered a heated debate after its official account published a controversial post directly aimed at XRP. The post compared the smell of a comet to “rotten eggs, urine, burning matches, and almonds,” before suggesting that XRP tokens resembled the same unpleasant mix.


According to the account, XRP creates an illusion of value by relying on a limited supply and speculation that banks are preparing to adopt it as a replacement for SWIFT. The post further ridiculed Ripple leadership with a satirical claim that “the president is sleeping with Brad Garlicmouse.”


The statement quickly went viral, sparking critical reactions across the crypto community. SamTheCarpetMan highlighted that Litecoin founder Charlie Lee sold his entire holdings at the market peak in December 2017, questioning confidence in the project.


In response, Litecoin wrote that critics should “now do Ripple, and its execs,” and dismissed further debate by stating, “Relax, Sparky. I’m not in the digital bank tube market. Go play that crap with XLM.”



Also Read: 340,000,000 XRP in Two Weeks as Price Prepares for Breakout


Strong Reactions From Crypto Community

Observers also weighed in on the dispute. Tony noted that Ripple executives could potentially file a defamation or trade libel suit if the remarks were deemed competitive. El Cadejo remarked that Litecoin was being heavily ratioed in its replies, arguing that community sentiment leaned toward dumping LTC.


XRP supporters defended their network, interpreting Litecoin’s post as evidence of insecurity. Pumpius claimed the attack proved “how scared they really are.” Guardians of the XRPL said the volume of criticism reflected concern, adding that XRP seeks to replace, not compete with, outdated settlement systems.


XRPawn Shop argued that Litecoin had acknowledged XRP’s superiority by resorting to attacks, while SleazyWeez recalled earlier disputes between XRP and Stellar, noting that many investors shifted funds into XRP during that period.


Following the backlash, Litecoin attempted to downplay the controversy. In a lighter post, the account stated, “Damn. Y’all gotta stop taking X so seriously. Go eat a Hot Pockets and I’ll see you in the morning if I’m not fired before then.”



The episode highlighted the intensity of rivalries within the crypto sector and the strong loyalty of online communities. While Litecoin’s remarks drew significant criticism, they also placed XRP at the center of market discussions, underscoring the sharp divide between competing digital assets.


Also Read: Top Analyst Says Unless These 3 Things Happen, The XRP Bull Run Is Not Over – Here’s What


The post Crypto War: Litecoin Takes Heavy Jab at XRP, Calls it ‘Urine’ – Here’s What’s Trending appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01429
$0.01429$0.01429
-2.98%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46