Draft guidance allows lower regulatory capital for permissionless blockchain assets with proper risk controlsDraft guidance allows lower regulatory capital for permissionless blockchain assets with proper risk controls

Hong Kong Proposes Reduced Capital Requirements for Banks Holding Crypto Assets

Hong Kong Proposes Reduced Capital Requirements for Banks Holding Crypto Assets

Hong Kong's financial regulator is proposing to ease capital requirements for banks holding certain cryptocurrency assets, potentially making the territory more attractive to financial institutions seeking crypto exposure.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority released draft guidance Monday outlining how banks should classify digital assets under international Basel Committee standards, according to financial news outlet Caixin Global. The proposed rules, contained in a new supervisory policy manual module designated CRP-1, are set to take effect in early 2026.

Under the draft framework, cryptocurrency assets operating on permissionless blockchain networks could qualify for reduced bank capital requirements if their issuers demonstrate "effective risk management and mitigation measures." The guidance represents Hong Kong's interpretation of Basel III standards for crypto asset treatment within its banking system.

The proposed relaxation contrasts with the typically stringent capital requirements applied to high-risk assets. Banks generally must hold capital equivalent to 100% or more of risky assets' value as a buffer against potential losses, but the new rules could lower these thresholds for qualifying crypto holdings.

The consultation paper was circulated to Hong Kong's banking sector as regulators seek input on the implementation approach. The HKMA's proposal reflects the territory's broader strategy to position itself as a regional cryptocurrency hub while mainland China maintains comprehensive bans on crypto trading and mining.

Hong Kong has been building regulatory infrastructure for digital assets, with licensing frameworks already established for crypto exchanges and stablecoin issuers. In August, the Securities and Futures Commission issued updated guidance requiring licensed crypto platforms to strengthen custody practices for client funds.

The proposed banking rules arrive as traditional financial institutions globally grapple with regulatory uncertainty around cryptocurrency holdings. While some jurisdictions maintain restrictive approaches, Hong Kong's framework could provide clearer pathways for banks to offer crypto-related services.

The draft guidance focuses specifically on permissionless blockchain assets, which operate without centralized control, distinguishing them from more centralized digital assets that may face different regulatory treatment. Banks would need to demonstrate that crypto asset issuers have implemented adequate risk controls to benefit from the reduced capital requirements.

Implementation of the new rules will depend on feedback from the banking sector and final approval from Hong Kong regulators. The 2026 timeline aligns with international Basel III implementation schedules.

Stay ahead of the curve with the latest industry news on Blockhead’s Telegram channel!
Market Opportunity
CyberKongz Logo
CyberKongz Price(KONG)
$0.001346
$0.001346$0.001346
0.00%
USD
CyberKongz (KONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30