The proposed bill also introduces site-blocking powers and a formal notice-and-takedown system for online copyright infringement as the government moves to curbThe proposed bill also introduces site-blocking powers and a formal notice-and-takedown system for online copyright infringement as the government moves to curb

Kenya moves to let courts order ISPs to block illegal livestreams

2026/03/16 17:47
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Kenya could soon compel internet service providers to block websites streaming pirated sports and entertainment events under a proposed overhaul of the country’s copyright law.

A draft Copyright and Related Rights Bill, 2026, published by the Kenya Copyright Board for public comment in March, introduces new rules on intermediary liability that would allow courts to order internet service providers and online platforms to block access to illegal streams.

The proposed bill focuses on live broadcasts, where delays in enforcement can wipe out the value of broadcast rights. It also introduces site-blocking powers and a formal notice-and-takedown system for online copyright infringement as the government moves to curb piracy that has spread alongside streaming platforms.

Under Part X of the bill, which governs liability for online intermediaries, courts could issue blocking orders requiring internet service providers to restrict access to domains distributing infringing content. The provision specifically targets piracy during live broadcasts, where delays in enforcement can make legal remedies ineffective.

The bill provides for “site-blocking orders for online infringement, including for live events and other time-sensitive content.”

That mechanism would allow rights holders to seek urgent court orders to disable access to websites or servers hosting illegal streams of sports matches, concerts and other live programming. Pirated livestreams often spread quickly across mirror sites and social media, making enforcement difficult under existing copyright rules.

The proposed bill also establishes a notice-and-takedown process similar to frameworks used in the United States and Europe. Platforms hosting user-generated content would be required to remove or disable access to material identified as infringing once they receive a valid takedown notice.

Users accused of infringement would have the right to file counter-notices disputing claims, triggering a process to restore the material unless the complainant seeks legal action.

Online intermediaries that comply with the requirements could qualify for “safe harbour” protection from liability for infringing material posted by users. Those who ignore valid notices or blocking orders could face legal exposure under the law.

Broadcasters and content owners like MultiChoice have long argued that piracy, particularly of live sports, erodes revenue from expensive broadcast rights and subscription services. Illegal streams of major football leagues and pay-TV events circulate widely across websites and messaging platforms like Telegram, often reaching thousands of viewers within minutes of going live.

The proposed law would replace Kenya’s Copyright Act of 2001, which predates large-scale streaming platforms and modern forms of digital piracy. The bill also updates rules on online intermediaries, digital royalty distribution and copyright enforcement as Kenya seeks to align its intellectual property regime with global digital markets.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26