The post Gold Price Forecast as 43-Year Drop Hits on US-Iran Oil Crisis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. During the week of March 16-20, gold plunged 11%, markingThe post Gold Price Forecast as 43-Year Drop Hits on US-Iran Oil Crisis appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. During the week of March 16-20, gold plunged 11%, marking

Gold Price Forecast as 43-Year Drop Hits on US-Iran Oil Crisis

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

During the week of March 16-20, gold plunged 11%, marking its largest weekly decline since 1983 and one of the sharpest drops in modern market history. Prices fell to around $4,488 per ounce, wiping out more than $2 trillion in market value in a matter of days.

XAU/USD 30-Day Price Chart. Source: CoinCodex.

Data from CoinCodex confirms that this selloff exceeded the sharp declines seen in late January, when gold dropped rapidly from roughly $5,320 to $4,650. While gold had previously rallied on geopolitical uncertainty, the current environment is producing a very different reaction.

Since February 28, when US-Israeli strikes on Iran began, gold has fallen more than 15%. Before that, the metal was trading near $5,500, supported by its traditional role as a safe-haven asset. That narrative is now being challenged as the same geopolitical tensions that once fueled demand are now contributing to its decline.

The conflict has disrupted supply flows through the Strait of Hormuz, raising concerns about a prolonged energy crisis. Rising oil prices are pushing inflation expectations higher, which in turn strengthens the case for the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates elevated.

Why rising rates are hurting gold

Higher interest rates reduce the appeal of gold because it does not generate yield. As bonds and other income-producing assets become more attractive, capital tends to rotate away from gold.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has indicated that inflation may remain elevated in the short term due to energy market pressures. As a result, markets expect the Fed to keep rates steady for longer, limiting upside potential for gold.

At the same time, geopolitical signals remain mixed. On March 20, President Trump suggested the possibility of scaling back military efforts, yet the US continues to deploy additional troops and carry out airstrikes in the region. This combination of uncertainty and sustained inflation pressure is creating an unusual environment for gold.

Bitcoin diverges as relative strength begins to improve

While gold struggles, Bitcoin is starting to show relative strength. Over the past 12 months, gold remains up 48.5%, while Bitcoin is down 16.5%. However, the short-term trend tells a different story.

Since late February, Bitcoin has gained over 11.6%, trading near $70,535, while gold has declined more than 15% during the same period. This divergence suggests a potential shift in market leadership.

The move highlights a growing narrative: Bitcoin may be regaining traction as an alternative asset, especially as traditional safe havens face pressure from macroeconomic forces.

Gold’s sharp decline reflects a rare structural situation where two opposing forces are acting simultaneously. Geopolitical conflict is driving inflation higher through oil prices, but that same inflation is forcing central banks to maintain high interest rates, undermining gold’s core appeal.

A similar dynamic was last seen during the early 1980s under Paul Volcker, when aggressive rate hikes pushed gold from $850 to $300 per ounce.

For now, markets remain in a transitional phase. Gold is under pressure, Bitcoin is stabilizing, and investors are reassessing what truly qualifies as a safe-haven asset in a changing macro environment.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/15604/gold-price-forecast-as-43-year-drop-hits-on-us-iran-oil-crisis

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.007586
$0.007586$0.007586
-0.31%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54