After months of debate, crypto firms and banks have finally found some middle ground. The latest CLARITY Act draft outlines a compromise on stablecoin yield rules. The key idea is simple. Users can earn rewards. But not just for holding stablecoins. Instead, rewards must come from activity.
This means actions like making payments, using DeFi apps, or joining loyalty programs may qualify. But earning passive income just by holding tokens will not be allowed. Lawmakers see this as a balanced approach. It tries to support innovation while also protecting the traditional banking system. Still, the details are not fully clear yet. That is where things get interesting.
The latest CLARITY Act draft sets clear boundaries. Platforms cannot offer a yield that looks like interest from a bank account. In other words, stablecoins cannot act like savings accounts that earn passive returns.
At the same time, the CLARITY Act draft allows “activity-based” rewards. These rewards must come from real usage, not just holding funds. For example, users might earn incentives for transactions, subscriptions or platform engagement.
Regulators like the SEC, CFTC and U.S. Treasury will define what counts as valid activity. They are expected to create detailed rules within a year. But one phrase stands out “economically equivalent to interest.” This term is broad and open to interpretation. With this, many believe future debates are almost guaranteed.
This deal solves a major conflict. Banks have long worried that stablecoins offering yield could pull deposits away from them. While crypto firms want to offer rewards to attract users. Now, both sides have given a little. Banks get protection from direct competition with interest-bearing stablecoins. Meanwhile, crypto platforms still get room to innovate through activity-based rewards.
Because of this, the compromise could help move the bill forward. It may also speed up broader crypto regulation in the U.S. Together, the impact on DeFi is still uncertain. Platforms like lending protocols rely heavily on yield models. If rules become too strict, some of these systems may need to adapt.
Even with this agreement, many questions remain. The biggest one is simple: what counts as “activity”? The answer will shape how rewards are designed across the industry. If defined too narrowly, it could limit innovation. Inversely, if rules are too loose, they may create loopholes.
By this, many believe the real debate is not over. Legal experts already expect future challenges. Different interpretations could lead to disputes between regulators and companies. In many ways, this deal does not end the fight. It just moves it to the next stage.
The CLARITY Act draft still needs to move through the legislative process. Lawmakers will review and refine the text before any final vote. While industry leaders and banks will continue discussions. More feedback is expected in the coming days.
If the bill passes, it could reshape how stablecoins work in the U.S. It may also influence global regulations. For now, the agreement marks progress. But it is not the finish line. The rules are clearer but not fully clear yet. Furthermore, in crypto, that difference matters more than it sounds.
The post Crypto and Banks Reach Deal in New Clarity Act Draft appeared first on Coinfomania.


