The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that… The post Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face. Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading. Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks. A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform. Wash Trading is the biggest problem in crypto A new research paper from Columbia University, published on November 7, 2025, via SSRN, analyzes on-chain data from @Polymarket a leading blockchain-based prediction market platform and concludes that approximately 25% of its total… — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) November 8, 2025 25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure. The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants. Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude.  In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that…

Crypto Analyst Decries the Negative Effect of Wash Trading on the Crypto Market

  • Wash Trading and spoofing are significant problems that cryptocurrency traders face.
  • Traders are advocating for rules to prevent malpractices in crypto trading.
  • Cryptocurrency trading involves structural and induced risks.

A cryptocurrency analyst has identified Wash Trading as the most significant problem faced by cryptocurrency traders. In his latest post on X, the analyst cited a new research paper by Columbia University, which identified a manipulative trend on Polymarket, the leading cryptocurrency prediction platform.

25% of Polymarket Trades are Inflated

Data from the research paper revealed that approximately 25% of the total volume traded on Polymarket over the past three years was inflated by “artificial trading.” The researchers noted that many traders on Polymarket adopted a rapid, simultaneous buying and selling of the same contracts to portray high liquidity and activity on the platform without assuming real risk or changing their net exposure.

The analyst’s observation triggered a discussion among crypto community members, most of whom are in agreement with the trend of malpractice across trading platforms. A respondent to the analyst’s post noted that wash trading is a lesser problem for the crypto community, compared to spoofing, which is structured to deceive genuine traders and market participants.

Regulation Can Tackle Malpractice in Crypto Trading

According to the respondent, traders can outmaneuver wash trading by riding on the volumes provided by perpetrators. However, spoofing occurs so quickly that only trading platforms or regulators can initiate appropriate conditions to control malpractices of that nature and magnitude. 

In the meantime, the respondent proposed a rule that will prevent traders from cancelling orders until after 15 seconds. According to him, it would discourage manipulators from placing orders they do not intend to fill, thereby curtailing their ability to deceive other participants, particularly retail traders playing by the rules.

Two Kinds of Risks in Crypto Trading

It is worth noting that trading in cryptocurrencies involves significant risks. Most of the risks considered are typical and unavoidable; therefore, crypto traders must learn to manage their portfolios. However, artificially engineered risks add to the complications surrounding cryptocurrency trading and investment, leading many users to advocate for institutional support in the form of rules to guide and protect them from avoidable risks.

Related :  ZachXBT Issues Warning on ZEUS Token, Citing Founders’ Links to Market Manipulation

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/crypto-analyst-decries-the-negative-effect-of-wash-trading-on-the-crypto-market/

Market Opportunity
Effect AI Logo
Effect AI Price(EFFECT)
$0.005201
$0.005201$0.005201
+0.30%
USD
Effect AI (EFFECT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Successful Medical Writing from Protocol to CTD Training Course: Understand International Guidelines and Standards (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026) – ResearchAndMarkets.com

Successful Medical Writing from Protocol to CTD Training Course: Understand International Guidelines and Standards (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026) – ResearchAndMarkets.com

DUBLIN–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The “Successful Medical Writing – from Protocol to CTD Training Course (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026)” training has been added to ResearchAndMarkets
Share
AI Journal2026/01/03 01:15
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41