TLDR Microsoft reported Q3 revenue of $77.7 billion and earnings per share of $3.72, both beating analyst estimates by healthy margins. The stock dropped over 2% in after-hours trading despite strong results, driven by concerns about elevated AI infrastructure spending reaching $34.9 billion. Capital expenditures on AI jumped 74% from the forecasted $20.5 billion, with [...] The post Microsoft (MSFT) Stock: Should You Buy After Another Earnings Beat? appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Microsoft reported Q3 revenue of $77.7 billion and earnings per share of $3.72, both beating analyst estimates by healthy margins. The stock dropped over 2% in after-hours trading despite strong results, driven by concerns about elevated AI infrastructure spending reaching $34.9 billion. Capital expenditures on AI jumped 74% from the forecasted $20.5 billion, with [...] The post Microsoft (MSFT) Stock: Should You Buy After Another Earnings Beat? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Microsoft (MSFT) Stock: Should You Buy After Another Earnings Beat?

TLDR

  • Microsoft reported Q3 revenue of $77.7 billion and earnings per share of $3.72, both beating analyst estimates by healthy margins.
  • The stock dropped over 2% in after-hours trading despite strong results, driven by concerns about elevated AI infrastructure spending reaching $34.9 billion.
  • Capital expenditures on AI jumped 74% from the forecasted $20.5 billion, with the company warning spending will stay high through 2026.
  • Free cash flow rose 33% year-over-year to $25.7 billion, helping offset the impact of increased infrastructure investments.
  • OpenAI signed a new agreement for $250 billion in Azure services, with Microsoft extending key revenue and IP exclusivities through 2030-2032.

Microsoft delivered another quarter of strong financial performance, but investors weren’t entirely convinced. The stock slipped just over 2% in after-hours trading on October 30, 2025, despite crushing earnings expectations.

The results themselves were impressive by any measure. Revenue hit $77.7 billion, beating the Street’s estimate of $75.6 billion. That represented 18% growth compared to the same period last year.

Earnings per share came in at $3.72, topping the expected $3.68. That marked a 12% increase year-over-year. Microsoft Cloud revenue reached $49.1 billion, up 28% from the previous year.


MSFT Stock Card
Microsoft Corporation, MSFT

The company’s gross margin expanded 18%. Free cash flow surged 33% to $25.7 billion. On paper, these numbers should have sent the stock higher.

So what spooked investors? The answer lies in Microsoft’s AI infrastructure spending. The company reported capital expenditures of $34.9 billion on AI infrastructure. That’s a 74% jump from the previously forecasted $20.5 billion.

AI Infrastructure Costs Mount

Microsoft made it clear that these elevated spending levels aren’t going away anytime soon. The company expects capital expenditures to remain high into 2026. The reason is straightforward: demand for AI computing power is growing faster than Microsoft can build out the necessary infrastructure.

The company needs more GPUs, networking chips, and power capacity for its data centers. Microsoft plans to increase total AI capacity by 80% in 2025. The data center footprint is expected to double within two years.

This spending spree creates a short-term problem for Azure. The cloud platform might not be able to onboard new customers or expand existing workloads as quickly as investors hoped. Azure has been a primary driver of Microsoft’s growth for the past two years.

The market’s reaction makes sense when you consider the stock’s valuation. Microsoft trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 41x. That’s expensive, even for a tech giant. Investors have been paying a premium based on expectations of continued strong growth.

When a company warns that returns on investments might take longer than expected, even stellar quarterly results can trigger selling. Microsoft was essentially priced for perfection heading into earnings. It delivered near-perfection, but the caveat about spending gave traders an excuse to take profits.

OpenAI Partnership Expands

One bright spot that may have gotten lost in the shuffle was Microsoft’s expanded partnership with OpenAI. The AI company signed a new agreement for $250 billion in Azure services. That’s not a typo.

Microsoft also extended key revenue and intellectual property exclusivities through 2030-2032. This deal provides visibility into future Azure revenue and cements Microsoft’s position as OpenAI’s primary infrastructure provider.

Analysts haven’t abandoned ship. Four analysts issued new price targets following the earnings report. The lowest came in at $625, with the highest at $650. The consensus target sits around $631, implying an 18% upside from current levels.

Ten analysts revised their earnings estimates higher in the last 60 days. The consensus estimate for fiscal 2026 increased by $0.18 to $15.53 per share. Microsoft boasts an average earnings surprise of 8.5%.

The company holds a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) with a Growth Style Score of B. Earnings are projected to grow 13.9% year-over-year for the current fiscal year. Sales growth is expected to hit 14%.

Microsoft’s cash flow growth reached 19%, with analysts projecting 23.1% expansion in 2026. The stock recovered from its after-hours decline, with analysts describing the post-earnings move as a “pause” rather than a “reversal.” After two gap-ups in the previous month, some traders had been calling the stock’s move a “blow off top.”

The post Microsoft (MSFT) Stock: Should You Buy After Another Earnings Beat? appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Audiera Logo
Audiera Price(BEAT)
$0.4786
$0.4786$0.4786
+0.78%
USD
Audiera (BEAT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

The post FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The FBI says Kimsuky APT, a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 02:55
a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

The post a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) secured over $15 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 03:13
Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future A significant warning has emerged from financial giant JPMorgan, signaling a potentially challenging future for the stablecoin market. This isn’t just a minor blip; it’s a stark reminder that the booming world of digital assets faces a critical juncture, especially for those relying on the stability of stablecoins. JPMorgan’s recent research note suggests that unless the broader cryptocurrency market expands dramatically, stablecoin issuers are heading towards a fierce ‘zero-sum game’ scenario. The Alarming Truth About the Stablecoin Market What exactly does a ‘zero-sum game’ mean for the stablecoin market? Essentially, it implies that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another must lose it. This isn’t about overall growth where everyone benefits; it’s about a fixed pie where new entrants only succeed by taking a slice from existing players. JPMorgan analysts point to a rapidly increasing number of new stablecoin projects vying for attention. Tether recently announced its unregulated stablecoin, USAT. Hyperliquid plans to launch USDH, aiming to reduce its dependence on Circle’s USDC. Even traditional fintech powerhouses like Robinhood and Revolut are developing their own stablecoins. This surge of new issuers intensifies competition significantly. While the overall stablecoin market capitalization has reached an impressive $278 billion, its share of the total crypto market has remained stagnant, averaging below 8% since 2020. This stagnation, according to JPMorgan, is a key indicator of the brewing zero-sum challenge. Why is the Stablecoin Market Becoming So Crowded? The influx of new players into the stablecoin market isn’t accidental; it’s driven by various strategic motivations. Many projects aim to gain greater control over their financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on third-party stablecoins. For instance, Hyperliquid’s move to USDH is a clear example of a platform seeking self-sufficiency and potentially lower operational costs. Furthermore, established fintech firms like Robinhood and Revolut see stablecoins as a natural extension of their existing services. They can integrate these digital assets into their platforms, offering new functionalities and potentially attracting a broader user base. However, this expansion comes with a caveat: if the overall crypto market doesn’t grow proportionally, these new offerings will merely fragment the existing demand, making profitability and widespread adoption harder to achieve for all. The core challenge remains the limited expansion of the total crypto market relative to the growing supply of stablecoins. This dynamic creates an environment where innovation must go hand-in-hand with genuine market expansion, not just internal competition. Navigating the Competitive Stablecoin Market Landscape So, what does this intense competition mean for users and the broader crypto ecosystem? For one, it could lead to increased innovation as issuers strive to differentiate their offerings through better features, lower fees, or enhanced security. However, it also presents potential risks, particularly if some stablecoins fail to gain traction or face liquidity issues in a highly competitive environment. Users should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence when choosing stablecoins. For existing giants like USDC, the entry of new competitors means they must continue to innovate and maintain their market leadership. Regulatory clarity also plays a crucial role here. As more entities enter the space, the demand for clear, consistent regulations will only grow, potentially shaping the future landscape of the stablecoin market significantly. Ultimately, the long-term health of the stablecoin ecosystem hinges on the ability of the entire cryptocurrency market to attract new capital and users. Without this broader expansion, JPMorgan’s warning of a zero-sum game could become a stark reality. In conclusion, JPMorgan’s recent warning serves as a potent reminder of the escalating competition within the stablecoin market. While innovation and new entrants are exciting, the core challenge lies in the stagnant growth of the broader crypto market. For stablecoins to truly thrive beyond a zero-sum dynamic, a significant influx of new capital and users into the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem is paramount. The future success of these digital anchors depends on collective market expansion, not just internal rivalry. Frequently Asked Questions About the Stablecoin Market Q1: What is a ‘zero-sum game’ in the context of the stablecoin market? A1: A ‘zero-sum game’ means that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another stablecoin must lose an equivalent amount. It implies that the overall market size for stablecoins is not growing, forcing issuers to compete for a fixed pool of users and capital. Q2: Why is JPMorgan concerned about the stablecoin market? A2: JPMorgan is concerned because despite the stablecoin market’s growth in total value, its share of the overall crypto market capitalization has stagnated. With many new entrants, they believe competition will intensify, leading to a zero-sum dynamic unless the broader crypto market significantly expands. Q3: Which new stablecoin issuers are mentioned in the warning? A3: The warning highlights new entrants such as Tether’s unregulated stablecoin USAT, Hyperliquid’s planned USDH, and stablecoins being developed by fintech firms Robinhood and Revolut. Q4: What could be the implications for users of stablecoins? A4: For users, increased competition could lead to more innovative features, potentially lower fees, and better services. However, it also means a greater need for due diligence to assess the stability and reliability of various stablecoins, especially if some struggle in a crowded market. Q5: How can the stablecoin market avoid a zero-sum outcome? A5: According to JPMorgan, avoiding a zero-sum outcome requires significant expansion of the broader cryptocurrency market. This means attracting new capital and users into the entire crypto ecosystem, thereby growing the ‘pie’ rather than just re-dividing existing slices. Did JPMorgan’s warning about the stablecoin market catch your attention? Share this crucial insight with your network and join the conversation about the future of digital assets. Your thoughts and perspectives are invaluable! To learn more about the latest stablecoin market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market institutional adoption. This post Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:45