The post S&P’s first Bitcoin-linked credit rating opens $130 trillion market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A quiet but historic moment has unfolded, which may reshape how traditional markets value digital assets like Bitcoin. For the first time, a major global rating agency has evaluated a company whose borrowing model is directly tied to BTC. On Oct. 27, S&P Global Ratings assigned Strategy Inc. (MSTR) a “B-” rating with a Stable outlook. Speaking on this, Mathew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck, said: “That’s high-yield territory. Able to service debt for now, but vulnerable to shocks. “ Nonetheless, the rating marks a recognition of the firm’s debt structure and the role of Bitcoin as legitimate collateral within the global credit system. In doing so, S&P placed Bitcoin on the same analytical map as corporate debt, sovereign bonds, and commodities-backed loans. This transforms what was once a theoretical concept into a rated financial reality. Risk or Opportunity? Meanwhile, S&P’s methodology views Bitcoin primarily as a source of volatility rather than capital. The firm cited Strategy’s “heavy reliance on Bitcoin”, “thin capitalization,” and “fragile dollar liquidity” as reasons for the speculative-grade classification. However, crypto analysts disagree with that interpretation, arguing that the model misjudges Bitcoin’s liquidity and structural resilience. Unlike traditional corporate reserves, BTC can be converted instantly, across jurisdictions, and without banking intermediaries. Jeff Park, chief investment officer at ProCap BTC, argued that S&P’s model undervalues Bitcoin’s liquidity and independence from the banking system. According to him: “Treating Bitcoin as NEGATIVE capital ignores its incredible liquidity, independence from the rest of the financial system, and all of its hedging properties.” Park furthered that accounting and tax frameworks are already catching up to this reality. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASC 820 rule now allows companies to mark Bitcoin at fair value. At the same time, US Treasury CAMT guidance enables firms to exclude unrealized… The post S&P’s first Bitcoin-linked credit rating opens $130 trillion market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A quiet but historic moment has unfolded, which may reshape how traditional markets value digital assets like Bitcoin. For the first time, a major global rating agency has evaluated a company whose borrowing model is directly tied to BTC. On Oct. 27, S&P Global Ratings assigned Strategy Inc. (MSTR) a “B-” rating with a Stable outlook. Speaking on this, Mathew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck, said: “That’s high-yield territory. Able to service debt for now, but vulnerable to shocks. “ Nonetheless, the rating marks a recognition of the firm’s debt structure and the role of Bitcoin as legitimate collateral within the global credit system. In doing so, S&P placed Bitcoin on the same analytical map as corporate debt, sovereign bonds, and commodities-backed loans. This transforms what was once a theoretical concept into a rated financial reality. Risk or Opportunity? Meanwhile, S&P’s methodology views Bitcoin primarily as a source of volatility rather than capital. The firm cited Strategy’s “heavy reliance on Bitcoin”, “thin capitalization,” and “fragile dollar liquidity” as reasons for the speculative-grade classification. However, crypto analysts disagree with that interpretation, arguing that the model misjudges Bitcoin’s liquidity and structural resilience. Unlike traditional corporate reserves, BTC can be converted instantly, across jurisdictions, and without banking intermediaries. Jeff Park, chief investment officer at ProCap BTC, argued that S&P’s model undervalues Bitcoin’s liquidity and independence from the banking system. According to him: “Treating Bitcoin as NEGATIVE capital ignores its incredible liquidity, independence from the rest of the financial system, and all of its hedging properties.” Park furthered that accounting and tax frameworks are already catching up to this reality. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASC 820 rule now allows companies to mark Bitcoin at fair value. At the same time, US Treasury CAMT guidance enables firms to exclude unrealized…

S&P’s first Bitcoin-linked credit rating opens $130 trillion market

A quiet but historic moment has unfolded, which may reshape how traditional markets value digital assets like Bitcoin.

For the first time, a major global rating agency has evaluated a company whose borrowing model is directly tied to BTC.

On Oct. 27, S&P Global Ratings assigned Strategy Inc. (MSTR) a “B-” rating with a Stable outlook.

Speaking on this, Mathew Sigel, the head of digital asset research at VanEck, said:

Nonetheless, the rating marks a recognition of the firm’s debt structure and the role of Bitcoin as legitimate collateral within the global credit system.

In doing so, S&P placed Bitcoin on the same analytical map as corporate debt, sovereign bonds, and commodities-backed loans. This transforms what was once a theoretical concept into a rated financial reality.

Risk or Opportunity?

Meanwhile, S&P’s methodology views Bitcoin primarily as a source of volatility rather than capital.

The firm cited Strategy’s “heavy reliance on Bitcoin”, “thin capitalization,” and “fragile dollar liquidity” as reasons for the speculative-grade classification.

However, crypto analysts disagree with that interpretation, arguing that the model misjudges Bitcoin’s liquidity and structural resilience.

Unlike traditional corporate reserves, BTC can be converted instantly, across jurisdictions, and without banking intermediaries.

Jeff Park, chief investment officer at ProCap BTC, argued that S&P’s model undervalues Bitcoin’s liquidity and independence from the banking system.

According to him:

Park furthered that accounting and tax frameworks are already catching up to this reality. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASC 820 rule now allows companies to mark Bitcoin at fair value.

At the same time, US Treasury CAMT guidance enables firms to exclude unrealized gains or losses from minimum-tax calculations.

He noted:

How does the rating impact Bitcoin?

Credit ratings are the gatekeepers of global finance. They determine how $130 trillion in fixed-income capital, spanning pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth portfolios, allocates risk.

So, a single-letter upgrade or downgrade can redirect billions in capital flows overnight.

Until this month, Bitcoin had no place in that ecosystem. Most regulated investors are prohibited from holding unclassified assets, leaving BTC exposure largely to equities or ETFs.

However, S&P’s evaluation of Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin-centric firm changes that framework.

This reclassification opens a narrow but significant channel for this class of investors.

Institutional investors constrained by mandate can now gain indirect Bitcoin exposure through the rated debt of a Bitcoin-backed issuer.

While these funds may never hold BTC directly, they can hold bonds tied to it, thereby providing an entry point that embeds Bitcoin into the architecture of global credit.

So, if only 1% of the world’s bond market were to rotate toward Bitcoin-linked instruments, that would translate to roughly $1.3 trillion in potential inflows. Notably, this is more than twice Ethereum’s market capitalization and larger than Mexico’s GDP.

Moreover, the implications extend beyond Strategy’s borrowing costs.

The rating represents BTC’s first credential within the credit hierarchy, signaling the asset’s entry into the structured finance core.

As a result, three systemic effects follow:

  • First, Bitcoin climbs the collateral ladder, joining gold and investment-grade bonds as acceptable security for loans and structured products.
  • Second, institutional eligibility widens—pension funds and credit vehicles can justify exposure to BTC-backed instruments under existing regulatory mandates.
  • Third, regulatory integration accelerates as rating methodologies inform Basel-aligned risk-weight frameworks, allowing Bitcoin exposure to be quantified rather than disqualified.

Together, these dynamics shift Bitcoin’s behavior. Instead of trading solely on speculative momentum, it begins attracting duration-based capital, which is yield-seeking money that stabilizes sovereign debt markets.

In that sense, S&P’s ‘B-’ designation is less about Strategy’s solvency than Bitcoin’s functional recognition as collateral. It marks the point where volatility starts to be expressed through yield spreads rather than sentiment.

As more rated issuers appear, BTC will build a credit history that agencies can model and investors can price.

Over time, the world’s first “Bitcoin yield curve” could emerge, allowing the asset to trade as digital gold and as a measurable, rated component of the global credit system.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/strategys-new-credit-rating-can-open-bitcoin-to-130-trillion-institutional-capital/

Market Opportunity
PoP Planet Logo
PoP Planet Price(P)
$0.0163
$0.0163$0.0163
-0.18%
USD
PoP Planet (P) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities

The post FBI says North Korea’s Kimsuky APT uses malicious QR codes to spearphish U.S. entities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The FBI says Kimsuky APT, a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 02:55
a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025

The post a16z targets AI and crypto after $15B fundraising year in 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) secured over $15 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/10 03:13
Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future A significant warning has emerged from financial giant JPMorgan, signaling a potentially challenging future for the stablecoin market. This isn’t just a minor blip; it’s a stark reminder that the booming world of digital assets faces a critical juncture, especially for those relying on the stability of stablecoins. JPMorgan’s recent research note suggests that unless the broader cryptocurrency market expands dramatically, stablecoin issuers are heading towards a fierce ‘zero-sum game’ scenario. The Alarming Truth About the Stablecoin Market What exactly does a ‘zero-sum game’ mean for the stablecoin market? Essentially, it implies that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another must lose it. This isn’t about overall growth where everyone benefits; it’s about a fixed pie where new entrants only succeed by taking a slice from existing players. JPMorgan analysts point to a rapidly increasing number of new stablecoin projects vying for attention. Tether recently announced its unregulated stablecoin, USAT. Hyperliquid plans to launch USDH, aiming to reduce its dependence on Circle’s USDC. Even traditional fintech powerhouses like Robinhood and Revolut are developing their own stablecoins. This surge of new issuers intensifies competition significantly. While the overall stablecoin market capitalization has reached an impressive $278 billion, its share of the total crypto market has remained stagnant, averaging below 8% since 2020. This stagnation, according to JPMorgan, is a key indicator of the brewing zero-sum challenge. Why is the Stablecoin Market Becoming So Crowded? The influx of new players into the stablecoin market isn’t accidental; it’s driven by various strategic motivations. Many projects aim to gain greater control over their financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on third-party stablecoins. For instance, Hyperliquid’s move to USDH is a clear example of a platform seeking self-sufficiency and potentially lower operational costs. Furthermore, established fintech firms like Robinhood and Revolut see stablecoins as a natural extension of their existing services. They can integrate these digital assets into their platforms, offering new functionalities and potentially attracting a broader user base. However, this expansion comes with a caveat: if the overall crypto market doesn’t grow proportionally, these new offerings will merely fragment the existing demand, making profitability and widespread adoption harder to achieve for all. The core challenge remains the limited expansion of the total crypto market relative to the growing supply of stablecoins. This dynamic creates an environment where innovation must go hand-in-hand with genuine market expansion, not just internal competition. Navigating the Competitive Stablecoin Market Landscape So, what does this intense competition mean for users and the broader crypto ecosystem? For one, it could lead to increased innovation as issuers strive to differentiate their offerings through better features, lower fees, or enhanced security. However, it also presents potential risks, particularly if some stablecoins fail to gain traction or face liquidity issues in a highly competitive environment. Users should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence when choosing stablecoins. For existing giants like USDC, the entry of new competitors means they must continue to innovate and maintain their market leadership. Regulatory clarity also plays a crucial role here. As more entities enter the space, the demand for clear, consistent regulations will only grow, potentially shaping the future landscape of the stablecoin market significantly. Ultimately, the long-term health of the stablecoin ecosystem hinges on the ability of the entire cryptocurrency market to attract new capital and users. Without this broader expansion, JPMorgan’s warning of a zero-sum game could become a stark reality. In conclusion, JPMorgan’s recent warning serves as a potent reminder of the escalating competition within the stablecoin market. While innovation and new entrants are exciting, the core challenge lies in the stagnant growth of the broader crypto market. For stablecoins to truly thrive beyond a zero-sum dynamic, a significant influx of new capital and users into the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem is paramount. The future success of these digital anchors depends on collective market expansion, not just internal rivalry. Frequently Asked Questions About the Stablecoin Market Q1: What is a ‘zero-sum game’ in the context of the stablecoin market? A1: A ‘zero-sum game’ means that for one stablecoin to gain market share, another stablecoin must lose an equivalent amount. It implies that the overall market size for stablecoins is not growing, forcing issuers to compete for a fixed pool of users and capital. Q2: Why is JPMorgan concerned about the stablecoin market? A2: JPMorgan is concerned because despite the stablecoin market’s growth in total value, its share of the overall crypto market capitalization has stagnated. With many new entrants, they believe competition will intensify, leading to a zero-sum dynamic unless the broader crypto market significantly expands. Q3: Which new stablecoin issuers are mentioned in the warning? A3: The warning highlights new entrants such as Tether’s unregulated stablecoin USAT, Hyperliquid’s planned USDH, and stablecoins being developed by fintech firms Robinhood and Revolut. Q4: What could be the implications for users of stablecoins? A4: For users, increased competition could lead to more innovative features, potentially lower fees, and better services. However, it also means a greater need for due diligence to assess the stability and reliability of various stablecoins, especially if some struggle in a crowded market. Q5: How can the stablecoin market avoid a zero-sum outcome? A5: According to JPMorgan, avoiding a zero-sum outcome requires significant expansion of the broader cryptocurrency market. This means attracting new capital and users into the entire crypto ecosystem, thereby growing the ‘pie’ rather than just re-dividing existing slices. Did JPMorgan’s warning about the stablecoin market catch your attention? Share this crucial insight with your network and join the conversation about the future of digital assets. Your thoughts and perspectives are invaluable! To learn more about the latest stablecoin market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market institutional adoption. This post Stablecoin Market: Urgent Warning of a Zero-Sum Future first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:45