The graft charges stem from the 2019 sale of Chevron's stake in the Malampaya gas facility to Davao City-based businessman Dennis Uy's Udenna CorporationThe graft charges stem from the 2019 sale of Chevron's stake in the Malampaya gas facility to Davao City-based businessman Dennis Uy's Udenna Corporation

Court junks Cusi, DOE execs’ bid to dismiss graft case over UC Malampaya-Chevron sale

2026/06/04 16:51
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MANILA, Philippines – The anti-graft court Sandiganbayan on Tuesday, June 2, junked the bid of former energy secretary Alfonso Cusi and Department of Energy (DOE) executives to dismiss the graft charges against them over the sale of Chevron’s stake in the Malampaya facility to Udenna Corporation.

In a 22-page resolution, the Sandiganbayan Third Division affirmed the validity of the information filed by the Ombudsman in October that accused Cusi and the DOE executives of hastily approving the 2019 sale of Chevron’s 45% stake in Malampaya to Udenna Corporation.

Udenna is owned by Davao City-based businessman Dennis Uy and a contributor to former president Rodrigo Duterte’s campaign.

Cusi and the other defendants argued that the case against them should be dropped since President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. later renewed Service Contract 38. But the court rejected this, saying that a later renewal does not erase past criminal liability.

“A felony is consummated when all the elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present,” the decision read.

The court added that the offender must then be held criminally liable “unless and until such liability is extinguished in accordance with law.”

The defendants also argued that the case should be dismissed since prosecutors failed to specify the exact amount of financial damage to the government in the original complaint. They also questioned the Sandiganbayan’s jurisdiction over the case.

However, the anti-graft court said that the prosecution’s move to amend the original charge sheet was legal. It noted that no constitutional or procedural rights were violated since the accused have not entered their formal pleas yet.

“Thus, as the accused have not yet been arraigned under the original Information, there is no constitutional or procedural right that was impaired when the court admitted the Amended Information,” the resolution read. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
CreatorBid Logo
CreatorBid Price(BID)
$0.006453
$0.006453$0.006453
-5.42%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Live Price Chart

SPACEX(PRE) Launchpad

SPACEX(PRE) LaunchpadSPACEX(PRE) Launchpad

Register for a chance to win a free lucky draw

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

RealStocks Now Live

RealStocks Now LiveRealStocks Now Live

Trade real U.S. stock via regulated brokerage