The post RFK Jr.’s panel weakens guidance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s handpicked vaccine committee voted on Friday to do away with the long-standing, universal recommendation that all babies receive a hepatitis B shot at birth, issuing weaker guidance for certain infants. The group, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, recommended that parents use individual decision-making in consultation with a health-care provider to determine when or if to give the hepatitis B birth dose to a baby whose mother tested negative for the virus. For babies who don’t receive the birth dose, the committee recommended that they wait to receive a first vaccine until they are at least 2 months old. The acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still has to sign off on that new recommendation. The CDC currently recommends that every baby get vaccinated against hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, regardless of their mother’s testing status. The move overturns that guidance, which has been credited with driving down infections in children by 99% since it was first introduced three decades ago and is widely considered to be a public health success story. Some committee members and public health experts warn that the change could have wide-ranging consequences, such as an increase in infections among kids. The vote only affects the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine series. The second would still be given one to two months after birth, with a third dose between 6 and 18 months of age.  All pregnant people are supposed to be tested for hepatitis B during pregnancy. During previous meetings, some advisors questioned the need for babies to receive a shot if their mothers test negative. But test results can produce false negatives, some people become infected later in pregnancy after being… The post RFK Jr.’s panel weakens guidance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s handpicked vaccine committee voted on Friday to do away with the long-standing, universal recommendation that all babies receive a hepatitis B shot at birth, issuing weaker guidance for certain infants. The group, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, recommended that parents use individual decision-making in consultation with a health-care provider to determine when or if to give the hepatitis B birth dose to a baby whose mother tested negative for the virus. For babies who don’t receive the birth dose, the committee recommended that they wait to receive a first vaccine until they are at least 2 months old. The acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still has to sign off on that new recommendation. The CDC currently recommends that every baby get vaccinated against hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, regardless of their mother’s testing status. The move overturns that guidance, which has been credited with driving down infections in children by 99% since it was first introduced three decades ago and is widely considered to be a public health success story. Some committee members and public health experts warn that the change could have wide-ranging consequences, such as an increase in infections among kids. The vote only affects the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine series. The second would still be given one to two months after birth, with a third dose between 6 and 18 months of age.  All pregnant people are supposed to be tested for hepatitis B during pregnancy. During previous meetings, some advisors questioned the need for babies to receive a shot if their mothers test negative. But test results can produce false negatives, some people become infected later in pregnancy after being…

RFK Jr.’s panel weakens guidance

2025/12/06 05:15

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s handpicked vaccine committee voted on Friday to do away with the long-standing, universal recommendation that all babies receive a hepatitis B shot at birth, issuing weaker guidance for certain infants.

The group, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, recommended that parents use individual decision-making in consultation with a health-care provider to determine when or if to give the hepatitis B birth dose to a baby whose mother tested negative for the virus. For babies who don’t receive the birth dose, the committee recommended that they wait to receive a first vaccine until they are at least 2 months old.

The acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still has to sign off on that new recommendation. The CDC currently recommends that every baby get vaccinated against hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, regardless of their mother’s testing status.

The move overturns that guidance, which has been credited with driving down infections in children by 99% since it was first introduced three decades ago and is widely considered to be a public health success story. Some committee members and public health experts warn that the change could have wide-ranging consequences, such as an increase in infections among kids.

The vote only affects the timing of the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine series. The second would still be given one to two months after birth, with a third dose between 6 and 18 months of age. 

All pregnant people are supposed to be tested for hepatitis B during pregnancy. During previous meetings, some advisors questioned the need for babies to receive a shot if their mothers test negative.

But test results can produce false negatives, some people become infected later in pregnancy after being tested and babies can get infected by other members of their household.

The panel’s closely watched two-day meeting in Atlanta comes after Kennedy gutted the committee and appointed 12 new members, including some well-known vaccine critics. ACIP sets recommendations on who should receive certain shots and which vaccines insurers must cover at no cost.

Eight members voted yes, while three voted no. Some advisors strongly pushed back on the new guidance ahead of the vote.

“This has a great potential to cause harm, and I hope that the committee accepts the responsibility when this harm is caused,” said Dr. Joseph Hibbeln, psychiatrist and voting member.

Dr. Cody Meissner, voting member and professor of pediatrics at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, said he hopes that pediatricians will continue to administer the birth dose within the first 24 hours of delivery and before discharge from the hospital.

“To follow any other course is not in the interest of infants,” he said.

Meissner added that more children will be injured and will catch hepatitis B infections. Hepatitis B, which can be passed from mother to baby during childbirth, can lead to liver disease and early death. Infants are more vulnerable to developing chronic hepatitis B infections, which have no cure.

“We will see hepatitis B come back,” he said. “The vaccine is so effective. It does not make sense in my mind to change the immunization schedule.”

In a statement Friday, the American Medical Association said the vote is “reckless and undermines decades of public confidence in a proven, lifesaving vaccine.” The group added that the decision was not based on scientific evidence and “creates confusion for parents about how best to protect their newborns.”

Meanwhile, Retsef Levi, a voting member and Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor, falsely claimed during meetings that experts have “never tested” the hepatitis B vaccine “appropriately.”

Some committee members raised concerns about vaccinating during the so-called neonatal period, which is a critical window of development for the brain and immune system. But decades of evidence show that the hepatitis B shot has been safely administered to newborns.

Other advisors said there is no evidence supporting the two-month delay to the birth dose.

“We have to make decisions with the data that we have, and we must use only the credible data to make the decisions, and not speculations and not hypotheses,” said Hibbeln.

A 2024 CDC study showed that the current vaccination schedule has helped prevent more than 6 million hepatitis B infections and nearly 1 million hepatitis B-related hospitalizations.

Merck and GSK manufacture the hepatitis B vaccines used starting at birth. Neither of the shots are significant revenue drivers for the companies, so the new recommendations should not have a material impact on their businesses.

Still, Merck said in a statement Friday that it is “deeply concerned” by the vote, which it said risks “reversing this progress and puts infants at unnecessary risk of chronic infection, liver cancer and even death.” The company added that “there is no evidence delaying it provides any benefit to children.”

In a statement, GSK said, “we await additional information and an official adoption of today’s recommendations by CDC to fully understand the potential impact.”

The panel’s vote will not affect insurance coverage for the shots, including under Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Andrew Johnson, principal policy analyst for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, told the members during the meeting.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/05/hepatitis-b-vaccine-babies-rfk-jr-cdc.html

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming?

When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming?

The post When Is ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’ Coming To Streaming? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mike (Josh Hutcherson) and Balloon Boy in “Five Nights at Freddy’s 2.” Universal Pictures/Ryan Green The horror thriller Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 is new in theaters. How soon will the second movie adaptation of the blockbuster video game be available to stream at home? Rated PG-13, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 opened in theaters nationwide on Friday. The official synopsis for the film reads, “One year has passed since the supernatural nightmare at Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza. The stories about what transpired there have been twisted into a campy local legend, inspiring the town’s first-ever Fazfest. ForbesRotten Tomatoes Critics Crush ‘Five Nights At Freddy’s 2’By Tim Lammers Former security guard Mike (Josh Hutcherson) and police officer Vanessa (Elizabeth Lail) have kept the truth from Mike’s 11-year-old sister, Abby (Piper Rubio), concerning the fate of her animatronic friends. But when Abby sneaks out to reconnect with Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy, it will set into motion a terrifying series of events, revealing dark secrets about the true origin of Freddy’s, and unleashing a long-forgotten horror hidden away for decades.” Directed by Emma Tammi, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 also stars Theodus Crane and Matthew Lillard as William Afton, as well as the voices of Freddy Carter, Wayne Knight, Mckenna Grace and Skeet Ulrich. ForbesHow Soon Will ‘Chainsaw Man – The Movie: Reze Arc’ Arrive On Streaming?By Tim Lammers The first place Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 will be available in the home entertainment marketplace is digital streaming via premium video on demand. Generally, Five Nights at Freddy’s 2’s studio, Universal Pictures (and its subsidiary Focus Features), releases its films on digital streaming via premium video on demand anywhere from 18 days to a month after they open in theaters. For example, Universal’s crime comedy Nobody 2 opened in theaters on Aug.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 09:55
STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce

STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce

The post STRF Has Performed Best During the Recent Bounce appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy’s (MSTR) senior perpetual preferred stock, STRF, is increasingly standing out as the company’s most successful credit instrument since its launch in March. Trading at $110, STRF has risen 36% from issuance and has rebounded 20% from its Nov. 21 low of $92. That date also marked bitcoin’s local bottom near $80,000, highlighting the strong correlation between STRF and bitcoin. STRF occupies the top tier of Strategy’s preferred structure. It pays a fixed 10% annual cash dividend and features governance rights plus penalty based step ups if payments are missed. Even with its premium pricing pushing the effective yield down to about 9.03%, demand remains strong due to the security’s senior protections and long duration credit profile. In late October, executive chairman Michael Saylor highlighted a growing credit spread between STRF and the junior STRD. The spread measures the extra yield investors demand to hold higher risk junior securities, which is now at 12.5%. At the Nov. 21 low, that differential widened to an all time high of 1.5 as investors crowded into senior exposure, STRD was trading as low as $65. The spread has since normalized to around 1.3. Divergence is now visible across Strategy’s preferred suite. STRC, has seen four dividend rate increases to sustain investor interest. Strategy’s equity has also rebounded, climbing from a Dec 1 low of $155 to about $185, reflecting improved sentiment across both the company’s balance sheet and the bitcoin market since announcing a $1.44 billion cash buffer resevere for the preferred dividend payments. Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/12/05/strf-emerges-as-strategy-s-standout-credit-instrument-after-nine-months-of-trading
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 10:11
Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims

Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims

The post Virginia Office Recovers $1.7M in USDT for Crypto Fraud Victims appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia has recovered approximately $1.7 million in cryptocurrency from perpetrators of an investment scam, returning the funds to two victims who lost money to fraudulent trading platforms. This action highlights ongoing federal efforts to protect consumers from rising crypto fraud schemes. U.S. authorities seized 420,740 USDT and 1,249,996 BUSD, totaling around $1.7 million from three wallets. The scam involved initial contact via text or social media, followed by building trust and directing victims to fake investment sites. Federal data shows Americans lose billions yearly to crypto scams; in one year, the FBI alerted over 4,300 potential victims, preventing $285 million in losses, with 76% unaware of the fraud. Discover how US authorities recovered $1.7M in crypto from investment scams, aiding victims and combating fraud. Learn key recovery tactics and prevention tips for safer crypto investing today. What is the latest cryptocurrency recovery by US authorities in investment scams? Cryptocurrency recovery by US authorities in investment scams recently saw the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia reclaim nearly $1.7 million from fraudsters, distributing it back to two affected individuals. The funds, consisting of seized USDT and BUSD from fraudulent wallets, underscore federal commitment to dismantling such schemes. This operation followed detailed investigations by the United States Secret Service, ensuring the assets could be legally returned. How do crypto investment scams typically operate to deceive victims? Crypto investment scams often begin with seemingly innocuous outreach, such as a text message or social media interaction that appears accidental, designed to pique curiosity and lower guards. Once engaged, scammers foster trust through consistent communication, eventually steering conversations to secure, encrypted apps to avoid detection. They promote fictitious trading platforms that mimic legitimate ones, displaying fabricated profits to encourage larger deposits; however, withdrawal…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 10:09