The post Nearly $50M in USDT Stolen After Address Poisoning Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A cryptocurrency trader has lost nearly $50 million in USDTThe post Nearly $50M in USDT Stolen After Address Poisoning Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A cryptocurrency trader has lost nearly $50 million in USDT

Nearly $50M in USDT Stolen After Address Poisoning Scam

A cryptocurrency trader has lost nearly $50 million in USDT after falling victim to an address poisoning scam, a technique that exploits transaction history rather than smart contract flaws. Blockchain security firms said the incident highlights how routine wallet habits can expose users to large-scale losses.

In an X post, on-chain analytics firm Lookonchain reported that the victim transferred 49,999,950 USDT to an attacker-controlled wallet on Dec. 20. The funds had just been withdrawn from Binance and were intended for the trader’s own address. Instead, they were redirected to a visually similar address created by the attacker.

Address Poisoning Scam Exploits Spoofed Addresses

The incident began with a test transaction. The trader sent a 50 USDT test transaction to confirm the destination address. Shortly after, an automated script generated a spoofed wallet designed to resemble the legitimate address.This step marked the start of the address poisoning scam. 

Source: X

The fraudulent address shared the same opening and closing characters as the intended wallet, with differences confined to the center of the string. Many wallet interfaces shorten these middle characters, reducing visibility during routine checks.

By exploiting this display behavior, the attacker sent small transactions from the lookalike address to the victim’s wallet. This inserted the fake address into the transaction history, causing it to appear legitimate during later transfers.

When the trader later copied an address from their history to complete the full transfer, the lookalike address was likely selected by mistake. Etherscan data shows the test payment was sent at 3:06 UTC. The erroneous $50 million transaction followed roughly 26 minutes later, at 3:32 UTC.

Stolen Funds Moved Through DAI, ETH, and Tornado Cash

Blockchain security company SlowMist reported that the attacker moved quickly in order to minimize recovery risk. In 30 minutes, the $50 USDT was exchanged for DAI by via MetaMask Swap. The decision was strategic because Tether can freeze USDT if it’s associated with illicit activity, but DAI doesn’t come with any centralized freezes.

The DAI was then converted by the attacker to approximately 16,690 ETH. Approximately 16,680 ETH was deposited into Tornado Cash. The mixer was an attempt to obfuscate the transaction trails, the usual step subsequent to an address poisoning scam.

Upon executing the transaction, the victim sent an on-chain message to the attacker by a $1 million white-hat bounty. The offer demanded the repayment of 98% of the stolen money. There has been no public acknowledgement or reply. The security companies remain active monitoring the address poisoning scam.

According to Chainalysis, the incident contributes to a year of rising crypto thefts. Losses in crypo hacks 2025 exceeded $3.4 billion, more than the previous year. One of those, a February breach of Bybit by North Korea-linked actors, totaled about $1.4 billion and was the largest crypto theft ever.

Source: https://coingape.com/nearly-50m-in-usdt-stolen-after-address-poisoning-scam/

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.00084
$0.00084$0.00084
-0.11%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav integrates Chainlink oracles to deliver neutral on-chain NAV, restoring trust during volatile DeFi markets. October shocks exposed DeFi operating without
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/21 17:51
SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

The SEC has filed proposed final consent judgments against former FTX executives. Key figures involved include Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/21 18:06
SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

The post SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu investors uneasy as Kusama’s silence fuels leadership concerns. SHIB slid 13% in three days, retracing from $0.00001484 to $0.00001305. Shibarium exploit and Kusama’s absence have weighed on investor trust. Shiba Inu investors are voicing concerns about the project’s long-term direction as leadership uncertainty and slow ecosystem progress erode confidence.  The token, which rallied from its meme-coin origins to become the second-largest meme asset by market cap, counts more than 1.5 million holders worldwide. But as SHIB matures, the gap between early hype and current delivery has widened.  The project’s transition into an “ecosystem coin” with spin-off projects and Shibarium, its layer-2 network, once raised expectations. Analysts now point to internal challenges as the main factor holding SHIB back from fulfilling that potential. Kusama’s Silence Adds to Instability Central to the debate is the role of Shytoshi Kusama, Shiba Inu’s pseudonymous lead developer. Investors are concerned about the intermittent disappearance of the project’s lead developer, who repeatedly takes unannounced social media breaks.  For instance, Kusama went silent on X for over a month before resurfacing this week amid growing speculation that he had abandoned the Shiba Inu project.  Kusama returned shortly after the Shibarium bridge suffered an exploit worth around $3 million. However, he did not directly address the issue but only reassured Shiba Inu community members of his commitment to advancing the project.  Although most community members didn’t complain about Kusama’s anonymity in the project’s initial stages, his recent behavior has raised concerns. Many are beginning to develop trust issues, particularly because nobody could reveal the SHIB developer’s identity for the past five years. He has conducted all communications under pseudonyms. SHIB Price Action Reflects Sentiment Shift Market reaction has mirrored the doubts. SHIB, which spiked 26% at the start of September, has since reversed. Over the last…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:13