Justin Sun-linked wallets accumulated $33M in LIT, pushing his stake above 5% of circulating supply after Lighter’s token launch. A cluster of wallets linked toJustin Sun-linked wallets accumulated $33M in LIT, pushing his stake above 5% of circulating supply after Lighter’s token launch. A cluster of wallets linked to

Justin Sun-linked wallets build 5% stake in Lighter’s LIT token with $33M purchase

Justin Sun-linked wallets accumulated $33M in LIT, pushing his stake above 5% of circulating supply after Lighter’s token launch.

Summary
  • Justin Sun-linked wallets acquired roughly $33M worth of LIT post-launch.
  • Holdings now represent about 5.32% of circulating LIT supply.
  • Accumulation appears tied to Lighter’s liquidity program, not airdrop farming.

A cluster of wallets linked to Justin Sun has quietly built a sizable position in Lighter’s newly launched LIT token.

On-chain data suggests the purchases were tied to liquidity provisioning rather than airdrop farming.

Wallet activity points to structured LIT accumulation

According to a Jan. 1 analysis by on-chain researcher MLM, four wallets associated with Justin Sun each received 1.6 million LIT shortly after the token generation event, totaling roughly 6.4 million LIT, valued at about $17 million at the time.

The wallets were funded between 34 and 50 minutes after Lighter’s airdrop allocation form closed, with no evidence that they participated in earlier points farming.

Further activity shows Sun deposited close to $200 million into Lighter’s Liquidity Provider Program. He later withdrew around $38 million, using approximately $33 million of that amount to purchase an additional 13.25 million LIT on the market.

In total, the wallets now hold 14.89 million LIT, worth roughly $39.8 million, giving Sun control of about 5.32% of the circulating supply and 1.33% of total supply. Around $5.5 million remains in spot balances tied to the same cluster.

The data also hints that similar arrangements may exist for other large LLP participants. One wallet that deposited $50 million USDC into the program roughly a month earlier received 874,875 LIT, though attribution in that case is less certain due to indirect transfers.

LIT under pressure post airdrop

LIT launched on December. 30 as the native token of Lighter, a high-performance perpetual futures DEX built as an Ethereum (ETH) zk-rollup. The token debuted with a 25% airdrop to early users and liquidity providers, instantly pushing the circulating supply to roughly 250 million tokens.

Tokenomics divides the supply equally between insiders and the ecosystem, with 24% going to investors and 26% going to the team. Both parties are subject to a one-year cliff and three years of linear vesting. LIT captures value through fee recycling, buybacks, staking, governance, and access to advanced features.

The ecosystem and insiders split the supply equally. Investors own 24% and the team owns 26%, and both allocations are locked for a year before vesting linearly over the next three years. LIT will capture value from the protocol through mechanisms such as fee recycling, buybacks, staking, governance, and access to higher-level features.

Since its launch, LIT has been under pressure due to liquidity withdrawals and post-airdrop profit-taking, which is a common occurrence for new tokens with wide distributions. The token debuted at roughly $3.40 during initial trading, but quickly experienced volatility, sliding about 30% shortly after to around $2.45–$2.80.

With $3.7 billion in 30-day volume and roughly $101 million in annualized fees, Lighter continues to report strong usage metrics despite volatility. Long-term outlook depends on adoption, revenue sharing execution, and DeFi perp market growth.

Market Opportunity
SUN Logo
SUN Price(SUN)
$0.019237
$0.019237$0.019237
+0.63%
USD
SUN (SUN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41