The post AI Assistants could Transform Governance: Buterin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says artificial intelligenceThe post AI Assistants could Transform Governance: Buterin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says artificial intelligence

AI Assistants could Transform Governance: Buterin

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says artificial intelligence could help create more efficient decentralized governance models and enable users to make better-informed decisions.  

Buterin said in an X post on Sunday that one of the main issues with democratic and decentralized modes of governance, like DAOs, is the “limits to human attention,” because of the many decisions that can require a wide range of expertise or time, which most don’t have.

“The usual solution, delegation, is disempowering. It leads to a small group of delegates controlling decision-making while their supporters, after they hit the delegate button, have no influence at all,” he said.

Source: Vitalik Buterin

It’s estimated that average participation rates in DAOs are between 15% and 25%. This can lead to issues such as the centralization of power and ineffective decision-making. Worst-case scenarios can result in governance attacks, where a bad actor acquires enough tokens to pass a damaging proposal without other members noticing.

AI-powered assistants that vote for you

Buterin proposes that personal assistant large language models (LLMs) could help solve the “attention problem” by providing users with the relevant information needed for a vote.

“If a governance mechanism depends on you to make a large number of decisions, a personal agent can perform all the necessary votes for you, based on preferences that it infers from your personal writing, conversation history, direct statements,” he said.

“If the agent is unsure how you would vote on an issue and convinced the issue is important, then it should ask you directly, and give you all relevant context,” Buterin added.

Lane Rettig, a researcher at the Near Foundation specializing in AI and governance, told Cointelegraph last year the non-profit was working on a similar idea: AI-powered digital twins that vote on behalf of DAO members to address low voter participation.

Privacy an important aspect to preserve

Another challenge in highly decentralized governance arises when key decisions depend on private or sensitive information, such as during negotiations, internal disputes, or funding choices, according to Buterin.

Related: Vitalik Buterin floats simulated transactions to enhance crypto security

“Typically, orgs solve this by appointing individuals who have great power to take on those tasks,” he said.

He added that an alternative solution could be users submitting their “personal LLM into a black box, the LLM sees private info, it makes a judgment based on that, and it outputs only that judgment. You don’t see the private info, and no one else sees the contents of your personal LLM.”

“All of these approaches involve each participant making use of much more information about themselves, and potentially submitting much larger-sized inputs. Hence, it becomes all the more important to protect privacy,” Buterin said. 

Magazine: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket — AI Eye

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/ai-assisted-dao-governance-vitalik-buterin?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Bad Idea AI Logo
Bad Idea AI Price(BAD)
$0.00000000104
$0.00000000104$0.00000000104
+2.97%
USD
Bad Idea AI (BAD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18