The post INJ Technical Analysis Feb 24 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ is trading below the EMA20 level under the overall bearish trend, with SupertrendThe post INJ Technical Analysis Feb 24 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ is trading below the EMA20 level under the overall bearish trend, with Supertrend

INJ Technical Analysis Feb 24

INJ is trading below the EMA20 level under the overall bearish trend, with Supertrend resistance dominant at $4.28. RSI in the neutral zone with mixed MACD signals indicates short-term consolidation, but BTC pressure requires a cautious approach for altcoins.

Executive Summary

INJ continues the bearish trend with a 2.05% daily loss at $3.34; price below EMA20 ($3.41) and Supertrend giving bearish signal. RSI at 45.57 is neutral, MACD shows positive histogram but multi-timeframe analysis reveals 11 strong levels weighted towards resistance (1D: 2S/3R, 3D: 2S/1R, 1W: 1S/4R), risk appears downward dominant. Critical supports at $2.96 and $2.65, resistances in $3.58-$3.38 range; BTC downtrend limiting altcoins. Investors should follow INJ Spot Analysis and INJ Futures Analysis.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

INJ’s current trend can be clearly defined as a downtrend. On daily and weekly charts, price is trading below major moving averages; particularly EMA20 ($3.41) acts as strong short-term resistance. 24-hour range $3.31-$3.56 shows limited fluctuation, while the overall structure is trapped within a descending channel from highs ($5+ levels). Supertrend indicator in bearish mode points to $4.28 resistance, limiting upward movements. Multi-timeframe analysis (1D/3D/1W) reveals 11 strong levels supporting trend continuity: 2 supports/3 resistances on daily, 2S/1R on 3-day, and 1S/4R distribution on weekly with resistance dominance. This structure reinforces short-term bearish dominance, requiring a close above $3.58 for potential trend reversal.

Structural Levels

Structural levels are determined by synthesizing Fibonacci retracements, pivot points, and historical swing highs/lows. Main support zone at $2.9570 (strength score 68/100), aligning with previous swing low and reinforced by volume accumulation. Secondary support at $2.6500 (61/100), testable in deeper pullback scenario. On resistance side, $3.5809 (72/100) is the most critical barrier; it overlaps with EMA20 and short-term pivot. Nearby resistance at $3.3837 (65/100) just above current price, followed by $5.3383 (61/100) as main target. These levels indicate market structure squeezed in a symmetrical channel; breakout direction will determine the trend.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 45.57 is positioned in the neutral zone; not oversold (below 30) but signaling momentum loss. Slight upward curl on daily chart, yet remaining below 50 preserves bearish bias. MACD’s positive histogram is notable; potential crossover above signal line indicates short-term bullish divergence. However, histogram expansion is limited, meaning momentum insufficient for strong reversal. Additional momentum tools like Stochastic and CCI also indecisive in 40-50 range; overall momentum neutral-bearish tilt, awaiting RSI above 55 and MACD zero line crossover for upside breakout.

Trend Indicators

EMA group in bearish alignment: Price below EMA20 ($3.41), EMA50 ($3.65) and EMA200 ($4.12) forming resistance higher up. Death cross (EMA20

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

Supports: $2.9570 (68/100) – High volume node in volume profile, 38.2% Fib. $2.6500 (61/100) – Main channel lower band, 50% Fib. Breakout to $1.4668 bearish target (22/100 score). Resistances: $3.3837 (65/100) – Pivot R1, EMA20. $3.5809 (72/100) – Daily high and 23.6% Fib. $5.3383 (61/100) – Long-term target, swing high. Scores calculated based on multi-TF test frequency; resistances higher scored, meaning upside difficult. Risk/reward: 1:2.5 for $3.58 breakout ($5.33 target), 1:3 downside ($2.65). Stop-loss suggestion: Below $3.28 for longs, above $3.45 for shorts.

Volume and Market Participation

24-hour volume at $61.87M is moderate; 10-15% drop from previous days confirms momentum weakness. OBV (On-Balance Volume) shows negative divergence; volume increase on price drops reflects bear strength, volume decrease on rises shows weakness. Volume Profile highlights $3.30-$3.50 range as POC (Point of Control), consolidation center. Daily VWAP at $3.42 below price, indicating seller dominance. Increasing volume breakout (>$80M) signals trend change; current low participation supports range-bound action. Altcoin-wide volume contraction aligns with rising BTC dominance.

Risk Assessment

Risk profile high; downtrend continuation probability 65%+, systemic risk elevated due to BTC correlation. Key risks: BTC break below $63.4K could drag INJ to $2.95 (1:4 R/R short opportunity). Volatility (ATR 5.2%) moderate, sudden spikes possible. Bullish risk: MACD divergence triggering $3.58 breakout to $5.33 with 60% upside (low-score target). Position management: 1-2% risk per trade, use trailing stops. Overall outlook cautious; wait for resistance breakout for longs, support test for shorts. Macro factors (Fed, regulation) may increase volatility.

Bitcoin Correlation

INJ shows high correlation with BTC (0.85%+); BTC at $64.143 in downtrend with Supertrend bearish, pressuring altcoins. BTC supports at $63.407/$61.779/$60.000; breaks could push INJ below $2.95. Resistances at $64.261/$65.792; BTC recovery would test INJ $3.58. Rising BTC dominance (currently 55%+) pulls money from alts; BTC above $65K required for bullish bias on INJ. Watch: BTC/INJ ratio rising, relative weakness signal.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

INJ technical setup bearish dominant: Price below structural resistances, indicators mixed but trend bearish. Short-term consolidation likely in $3.30-$3.58 range; breakout above $3.58 bullish, below $2.95 bearish trigger. Strategy: Short bias, short on support test; long on resistance breakout. Risk management critical, prioritize BTC moves. For detailed spot/futures, follow INJ Spot Analysis and INJ Futures Analysis. Long-term $5+ potential, but current bias suggests cautious stance. (Total words: ~1250)

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/inj-comprehensive-technical-analysis-february-24-2026-detailed-review

Market Opportunity
Injective Logo
Injective Price(INJ)
$3.211
$3.211$3.211
-3.04%
USD
Injective (INJ) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18