TLDR: SOL rejected $87–$91 Fibonacci resistance, signaling possible Elliott Wave 3 downward movement. Maintaining a price below $86.90 keeps the bearish structureTLDR: SOL rejected $87–$91 Fibonacci resistance, signaling possible Elliott Wave 3 downward movement. Maintaining a price below $86.90 keeps the bearish structure

Solana Technical Review Shows Potential Decline Toward $79–$72

2026/03/12 09:24
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR:

  • SOL rejected $87–$91 Fibonacci resistance, signaling possible Elliott Wave 3 downward movement.
  • Maintaining a price below $86.90 keeps the bearish structure intact for near-term SOL declines.
  • Downside targets for SOL include $79, $76, and major support between $74–$72.
  • Institutions hold $540M in SOL ETFs despite weak short-term momentum and no new inflows.

Solana price analysis indicates SOL may be entering a strong bearish phase as it rejected key Fibonacci resistance. Wave three appears to be forming, and critical levels along with potential downside targets are now the focus for traders.

Solana Faces Bearish Technical Pressure

Recent Solana price analysis shows the market completed a corrective wave two, which tested the Fibonacci cluster between $87 and $91 before reversing. This behavior aligns with an Elliott Wave 1–2 pattern, signaling a potential impulsive decline. 

Traders remain focused on the $86.90 level, the upper boundary for wave two, as maintaining price below it confirms the bearish count.

The resistance zone contains multiple Fibonacci retracements—38.2%, 50%, 61.8%, and 78.6%—which acted as strong supply. SOL failed to reclaim mid-range retracement levels, indicating weakened bullish momentum. 

This failure strengthens the case for a more aggressive downside movement consistent with wave three. Projected targets for wave three align with Fibonacci extensions. 

The first is near $79, followed by $76, and finally the broader support zone between $74 and $72. This lower band reflects prior accumulation areas where buyers historically entered the market, offering potential stabilization points.

Wave three is typically the fastest and most dynamic segment of an Elliott sequence. If SOL accelerates downward, these targets could be reached quickly. 

These could confirm the transition from corrective bounce to impulsive decline. Price action below $84 would serve as an additional signal of bearish continuation.

Market structure also shows that the previous decline from wave (X) may indicate a complex correction rather than a bullish continuation. 

This pattern suggests that SOL’s near-term movement may remain primarily influenced by short-term traders rather than strong institutional inflows.

Institutional Positioning Remains Steady

While SOL shows weak short-term momentum, institutional exposure continues to grow. Recent 13F filings show the top thirty institutional holders collectively maintain about $540 million in SOL ETFs, totaling roughly 4.3 million SOL. 

Electric Capital leads with $137.8 million, followed by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. ETF inflow data shows SOL received no new institutional additions during the latest snapshot. 

By contrast, Bitcoin added 3,610 BTC and Ethereum gained 6,325 ETH, highlighting that SOL price movements remain largely driven by spot and derivatives markets rather than current ETF demand.

Institutions maintained exposure even as SOL fell roughly 30% from Q4 highs. This behavior indicates growing confidence in Solana as a long-term asset rather than a speculative trade. 

Such steadiness often signals strategic accumulation, which could provide structural support if bearish momentum continues.

As Solana gains broader adoption, institutional positioning could help transition SOL from a high-beta altcoin to a core layer-1 asset. Combined with technical factors, this institutional backing may influence longer-term price stability.

The post Solana Technical Review Shows Potential Decline Toward $79–$72 appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

The post Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program is and how it
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 10:44
South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa HIV vaccine trial efforts are advancing after researchers launched the first locally developed HIV vaccine study on the continent.   South Africa expands
Share
Furtherafrica2026/03/12 09:30