The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulatingThe public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

2025/12/13 22:35

The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating the OM token’s price, and MANTRA’s chief executive officer (CEO) is demanding transparency about tokens held by the exchange.

The conflict centers on preparations to migrate OM tokens to MANTRA’s new blockchain. But it has reopened wounds from April, when the OM token crashed more than 90% in hours, wiping out over $5 billion in market capitalization.

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

John Patrick “JP” Mullin, MANTRA’s founder and CEO, posted an open letter on X, addressing OKX’s concerns about the migration timeline. The letter confirmed that the ERC-20 OM token would be deprecated on January 15, 2026, followed shortly by a chain upgrade and 1:4 token split handled at the protocol level, requiring no user interaction.

But Mullin made a pointed request, asking OKX to disclose how many OM tokens belong to users versus how many sit on OKX’s own balance sheet.

“As part of our commitment to regulatory compliance, it is our longstanding policy to verify the background of any significant movements of OM tokens,” Mullin wrote, later adding, “For this reason, we reiterate our request for OKX to confirm (i) the number of OKX users’ $OM tokens to be migrated and (ii) the number of $OM tokens held by OKX on OKX’s balance sheet.”

On December 8, he characterized OKX’s post on the OM migration as misinformation, containing “factual errors” adding that “OKX’s unilateral creation of specific dates without consultation with MANTRA has caused unnecessary market confusion.”

The following day, the CEO, who has been calling for all OM holders to migrate their tokens to MANTRA, against their own set deadline, mentioned that OKX just responded to them recently for the first time since the April crash.

Exchange hits back with manipulation claims

OKX responded, stating that it was clarifying “the facts, since MANTRA team continues to push a misleading narrative.” It added that it had “identified evidence that multiple connected and colluding accounts used large quantities of OM as collateral to borrow significant amounts of USDT, artificially pushing OM’s price up.”

The exchange said its risk team flagged the abnormal activity and requested corrective action, but the account holders refused to cooperate.

“To contain the risk, control of these related accounts was taken,” OKX said in its statement.

“Shortly afterwards, the OM price crashed. OKX liquidated only a very small portion of OM, yet the sharp price collapse resulted in substantial losses that were fully absorbed by the OKX Security Fund.”

The exchange said it has submitted full evidence and documentation to regulators and law enforcement agencies, and that multiple litigations are underway. OKX questioned where the unusually large quantities of OM originated and why certain groups controlled such a substantial portion of the token supply.

Observers continue to speculate on April’s event

Taran Sabharwal, CEO of crypto trading firm STIX, offered his analysis of the mechanics behind April’s crash.

He speculated that accounts borrowed USDT against OM collateral through spot margin trading. Supposedly, the accounts went on to use those funds to purchase more OM, which inadvertently drove the price higher. When the price fell below liquidation levels, automatic selling by OKX triggered a cascading effect across multiple exchanges.

The STIX CEO also wrote, “My guess, as a complete outsider, is that JP may be suing OKX to unfreeze the accounts and return the remaining tokens back to him.”

Mullin responded to the speculation post, clarifying his company’s current position with OKX. He stated, “I want to make it VERY clear. Neither MANTRA or myself have ANY ongoing litigation or legal actions ongoing with OKX. This is between them and other larger traders/investors of OM.”

He mentioned that the situation had not been in the public domain until OKX totally misunderstood the migration timeline to MANTRA’s mainnet and put out incorrect information that he had to correct.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40