Must Read
Credit grabbing is not the problem. It’s not what ails the budget.Credit grabbing is not the problem. It’s not what ails the budget.
[Rear View] A budget free of pork and ‘epal’? Get real.
The President’s allies have described the 2026 General Appropriations Act as the “cleanest” budget in history, which implies that previous national budgets, including the ones passed during the leadership of the current Senate President, occupy a broad spectrum that ranges from the dirtiest to somewhat clean. Lawyers would call that an admission against interest, but no one is suing for past sanitary habits.
This year’s budget is patronage-proof, they said, with another senator calling it “pork-free.” This sweeping statement was answered with an equally sweeping statement from another senator, the President’s sister and self-anointed defender of Vice President Sara Duterte. The budget is oozing with ground pork, she declared, tossed in to secure her impeachment.
Several House leaders, however, are distancing themselves from any impeachment move this year even as the Palace has shifted its tone from outright rejection to vague consent, invoking accountability. Contrast this with last year, when the House, after systematically demolishing the Vice President with shocking revelations of corruption, impeached her in a fast-break move just days before the start of the midterm campaign.
The mood and the disposition at the House has shifted from stoked to indifferent, from “palaban” in 2025 to “matamlay” in 2026.
It’s not hard to see why the congressmen are quietly grumbling about their current predicament. The Palace continues to cast them as villainous characters in the President’s floundering anti-corruption campaign. In seeking to extol the virtues of the 2026 budget, the President’s men cited two examples: the removal of guarantee letters from legislators for those seeking medical assistance and the supposed ban on the presence of legislators during “ayuda” payouts. In short, no more “epal” or credit-grabbing.
But these policy declarations, oozing with assured virtue, didn’t come with instructions, as some legislators pointed out. How would they now answer such requests from their constituents, who look to their congressmen for succor, not as their last resort during emergencies but their first option? What do they tell the families when the hospital bill starts piling up? The health secretary’s assurance that ordinary folks need not worry about their hospital bills should be taken at face value considering the broken state of our health care system.
Dealing with political costs
I hope the President’s advisers have weighed the political costs of demonizing members of Congress at this stage. Perhaps they believe they have a higher calling, a purpose that entails breaking the ties that bind a sitting president and his congressional allies, even at the expense of priority bills and impeachment.
They have deprived legislators of the tools to secure votes, and that includes tarpaulin streamers, not a sin or a crime, except in the eyes of pundits and the self-righteous middle class scandalized by the sight of politician’s streamers during “ayuda” payouts where the lowest amount doled out, equivalent to about four orders of venti-sized matcha latte, is a lifeline to the poor who don’t really bother with such things as credit-grabbing as long as the family has food for a day.
Credit grabbing is not the problem. It’s not what ails the budget. And it’s the least of our legislators’ frailties.
The national budget has always been a bottomless source of nourishment for the insatiable, from legislators, contractors and suppliers, and executive officials. Credit goes to the President for making corruption in the national budget a national concern, shocked as he was by the extent of corruption in the budget process, and probably more shocked to learn that his people had their big toes dipped in the milk of public funds all this time, shocked to the point of being immobilized, unable, some say unwilling, to hold his own people accountable.
Pork by any other name
In simpler times, let’s call it the 90s, “pork barrel” meant basketball courts, farm-to-market roads, health centers, and other infrastructure projects credited to legislators. It was defended as a tool to “balance” the national government’s focus on major infrastructure projects, neglecting in the process the needs of localities and local constituents. With pork, the felt needs of the people, yes, even a basketball court, are theoretically satisfied by their congressmen.
Then pork was segregated into “soft” and “hard” projects, “soft” an all-encompassing term to include livelihood projects, products, and instructional materials, the stuff that made Janet Napoles rich and her network of legislators richer. Under this category falls the different permutations of financial assistance doled out by government, known by the shorthand “ayuda.” Whether “soft” or “hard,” both are fat-rich, clogging arteries and fattening the pockets of those who indulge in luxuries purchased with ill-gotten wealth.
As the budget grew to trillions, the state of the nation went the opposite direction. Basic services, living conditions, and the overall quality of life has deteriorated faster than you can say nepo baby. The 2026 budget doesn’t address that. For some critics, it has only been packaged with an extra application of deodorant. – Rappler.com
Joey Salgado is a former journalist, and a government and political communications practitioner. He served as spokesperson for former vice president Jejomar Binay.
Piyasa Fırsatı
Notcoin Fiyatı(NOT)
$0.0004015
$0.0004015$0.0004015
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.
Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems
The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play.
However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like.
Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming?
Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss.
In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming.
How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
- Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
- Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
- Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
- Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
- Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
- Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’
Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors. Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how
The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01