Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi? Written by: TechFlow LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing wellWill Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi? Written by: TechFlow LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing well

The DeFi version of MicroStrategy is born? A $2 million capital gamble and a boardroom battle

2025/07/18 12:00
Okuma süresi: 8 dk

Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi?

Written by: TechFlow

LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing well lately.

On July 14, 2025, documents from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) showed that Compound founder Robert Leshner used his personal funds to purchase approximately 600,000 shares of Nasdaq-listed company LQR House Inc. (LQR), with a shareholding ratio of 56.9%, making him the largest shareholder.

According to the Form 13D filed, Leshner's total investment was approximately $2.03 million, with some of the shares purchased through Interactive Brokers at $3.77 per share.

The news caused LQR House shares to rise 45% in trading on Monday and reached $10 before the close of trading on Wednesday, a three-fold increase from the purchase price.

However, Leshner's acquisition was not smooth sailing, and soon a capital offensive and defensive drama over control was staged with the board of directors.

The battle of control and anti-control

"I purchased a controlling stake in $YHC, a liquor company with a low market value and a somewhat shady history. My plan is to replace the board of directors and help the company explore new strategies." On July 14, Leshner revealed his "intention to change people" on the day of the SEC announcement and reminded retail investors of the risks: "I have not done extensive due diligence, and there are signs that the company is plotting something fishy. But please be extra careful with any low-market-value company. I could lose all my investment, and so could you."

According to the SEC filing, Leshner plans to propose the removal of all current board members and nominate a new team of directors, either by written consent or by convening a special meeting of shareholders, in accordance with the company's articles of association and Nevada law.

Leshner also stressed that no specific agreements have been reached with other shareholders or third parties, but further communication and collaboration with relevant parties in the future is not ruled out.

However, Leshner's plan seemed to have hit a snag.

On July 14, LQR House submitted a supplement to its prospectus to the SEC. According to the document, LQR House stated that it would increase the number of shares that could be offered and sold through sales agents to US$46 million, which does not include US$2,700 worth of shares sold under the ATM agreement as of the date of the supplement.

Normally, ATM additional issuance is a flexible means of financing for listed companies, but at the current sensitive moment, it obviously has a deeper meaning.

After reading the supplementary materials, Leshner said: "I disagree with LQR House's approach to ATM issuance (selling stocks). I think it is ineffective and I am consulting a lawyer." The next day, on July 15, LQR House shareholder Kingbird Ventures LLC filed a lawsuit in a Florida court, accusing CEO Sean Dollinger and board members of abusing fiduciary responsibilities, misappropriating assets, and violating the company's articles of association; and requested the court to freeze certain share changes, suspend the board of directors' power, and prevent "control hijacking."

If the court rules for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or injunction, Leshner's plan to call a special shareholder meeting to remove the current directors could be temporarily shelved.

In addition, according to sources, the company may try to fight back with a "poison pill." The so-called "poison pill plan" means that when a shareholder's shareholding ratio reaches or exceeds the preset "trigger line," the company will automatically issue new shares to other shareholders (excluding the acquirer) at a significantly discounted price, thereby diluting the acquirer's shareholding ratio, increasing the acquisition cost, or even forcing it to give up.

But Leshner's supporters aren't far behind.

On July 16, 2025, Makesy Capital announced the acquisition of 0.1% of LQR House's shares and pledged to support Leshner's reforms. At the same time, Makesy Capital also launched an online campaign against LQR House CEO Sean Dollinger, saying that this would serve as a warning to CEOs of listed companies who treat the public market and the investing public as private piggy banks.

As of press time, this battle of control and counter-control is still going on intensely, with both sides cautiously testing the waters, guarding against the possibility that any careless decision may have negative effects.

Why LQR House?

LQR House is a Nasdaq small-cap company whose market value was once less than $3 million. Even after its recent surge, its current market value is only around $11 million.

At first glance, this looks like a speculative game of a micro-cap concept stock, but the entry of Robert Leshner offers another possibility.

As the founder of Compound, Leshner was once a pioneer in on-chain finance. He led Compound to set off the DeFi lending trend, and has also actively explored the combination of DAO and RWA in the past two years. As crypto capital continues to seek deep integration with traditional markets and crypto stocks are rising, this DeFi pioneer with a technical background chose to bet on LQR House. There may be three reasons:

First, the identity of a listed company. LQR House has the qualification to be listed on Nasdaq, and the compliance channel has been opened. For crypto players who want to get involved in the traditional capital market, this type of "lightweight" listed company has unique strategic value. Bypassing the high costs required for IPO or SPAC, with the help of the ready-made capital market channel, it is easier to become a springboard for funds, trust and voice.

Secondly, the threshold for controlling shares is low and the equity structure is loose. LQR House has dispersed equity and a small circulating stock, which makes it easy for external capital to quickly gain control. This is very attractive to investors who want to build a cross-border capital platform. Leshner used $2.03 million to acquire 56.9% of the controlling stake, which is far more cost-effective than most capital operation cases.

Finally, the company itself has made initial contact with the crypto business. According to CoinDesk, LQR House announced that it would inject $1 million in Bitcoin into its treasury and enable crypto payment services. This means that it has taken a step forward in connecting digital assets with traditional retail, and has the foundation to expand into the crypto capital ecosystem.

Is a Compound version of MicroStrategy coming?

Since MicroStrategy included Bitcoin in its balance sheet and SBET became the new darling of the stock market, the global capital market has been swept by the trend of "listed companies holding cash."

The question that the market is most concerned about is: Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of the DeFi field? Will he incorporate $COMP or even crypto lending business into LQR House to form a new asset reserve and capital operation model?

Of course, there is one thing that may be overlooked by everyone. In addition to being the founder of Compound, Leshner’s latest title is the founder of Superstate.

Superstate, a company founded in 2023, is targeting the track of on-chain funds and compliant tokenized assets.

Unlike Compound, which is aimed at pure DeFi users, Superstate is committed to providing institutional investors with traditional asset funds based on blockchain. Its first product is a tokenized version of the "Short-Term U.S. Treasury Bond Fund", and its service targets directly the traditional financial market.

The keywords that Superstate has always emphasized are: on-chain compliance, asset tokenization, and institution-friendly. Its ambition is to open up the connection channel between traditional finance and on-chain assets.

This may be Leshner's potential layout direction for LQR House.

As a ready-made Nasdaq listing platform, LQR House has a "ticket" to the traditional financial market and can provide a display window for the public capital market for Superstate's compliant products, RWA business or on-chain funds.

The combination of the two means that it is possible to create a "listing platform under Superstate", use the public market to attract on-chain products, and provide a legal and compliant secondary market channel for Superstate's fund raising.

In addition, LQR House has previously been involved in crypto payments and digital asset layout, and can also serve as a "test field" for Superstate products or a channel for ecological application landing.

This is slightly different from the logic of MicroStrategy writing Bitcoin into its financial statements and SharpLink Gaming reserving Ethereum. What Leshner may want to do is to embed on-chain funds and tokenized assets into the capital operations of listed companies.

Truly bring "on-chain capital" into the traditional financial framework and create a compliant DeFi-TradFi linkage model.

This will be a deeper experiment.

It is not only a story of holding currency, but also a story of capital.

Piyasa Fırsatı
DeFi Logosu
DeFi Fiyatı(DEFI)
$0,000361
$0,000361$0,000361
+%13,88
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

                                                                               Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors.                     Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01