Venice Token's 45% daily surge masks a more significant trend: 145% gains in seven days alongside unusual volume patterns. Our data analysis reveals strategic accumulationVenice Token's 45% daily surge masks a more significant trend: 145% gains in seven days alongside unusual volume patterns. Our data analysis reveals strategic accumulation

Venice Token Soars 145% in 7 Days: On-Chain Data Reveals Accumulation Pattern

2026/02/16 07:01
Okuma süresi: 6 dk

Venice Token (VVV) has captured market attention with a 45.1% price increase in 24 hours, but our analysis suggests this move represents just one chapter in a larger narrative unfolding across on-chain metrics. The token currently trades at $4.50, having touched a 24-hour high of $4.60—yet the more revealing statistic is its 145.96% gain over seven days, accompanied by a volume surge that warrants deeper investigation.

What makes this rally particularly noteworthy is the relationship between circulating supply (43.5 million VVV) and total supply (78.6 million), indicating that 44.6% of tokens remain locked or unvested. This supply constraint, combined with daily trading volume reaching $57.6 million—representing 29.5% of market capitalization—suggests institutional-grade liquidity despite VVV’s mid-cap status at rank #180.

Volume Analysis Reveals Accumulation Pattern

We observe a striking divergence between price action and volume behavior that typically precedes sustained rallies. The 24-hour volume of $57.6 million represents a 327% increase compared to the token’s 30-day average daily volume of approximately $13.2 million. This volume spike coincides with the price moving from $3.03 (24h low) to $4.60 (24h high), creating a 51.8% intraday range that absorbed significant selling pressure without collapsing.

The volume-to-market cap ratio of 0.295 places Venice Token in the top quartile for mid-cap assets in terms of liquidity efficiency. For context, tokens with similar market capitalizations typically maintain ratios between 0.10 and 0.15. This suggests either: (1) new capital entering the ecosystem, (2) existing holders rotating positions, or (3) market makers establishing deeper order books ahead of potential listings or integrations.

Our analysis of the price recovery from December 2025’s all-time low of $0.9198 reveals a 384% gain, with the token now consolidating at approximately 80% below its January 2025 all-time high of $22.58. This positioning is significant—VVV has retraced the typical 80-85% drawdown common in crypto bear phases while maintaining structural support above the $3.00 psychological level.

Supply Dynamics and Tokenomics Pressure Points

The fully diluted valuation (FDV) of $352.4 million compared to the current market cap of $195 million creates a 1.81x multiplier—relatively compressed compared to many venture-backed tokens where FDV/MC ratios exceed 5-10x. This indicates either aggressive early vesting or a more balanced emission schedule that reduces long-term sell pressure.

With 55.4% of total supply currently circulating, we calculate that approximately 35 million VVV tokens remain locked. Assuming linear vesting over the next 12-24 months, this represents potential monthly unlocks of 1.5-2.9 million tokens. At current prices, that translates to $6.7-13.1 million in monthly sell pressure—manageable given the current $57.6 million daily volume, but a critical variable if volume normalizes to historical averages.

The market cap increase of $60 million in 24 hours (44.5% growth) slightly outpaced the price gain of 45.1%, indicating minimal dilution from unlocks during this rally phase. This synchronization suggests that any scheduled vesting during this period was absorbed by demand, or that unlock events are structured around longer time horizons.

Technical Structure and Resistance Mapping

From a technical perspective, Venice Token faces its first major resistance cluster at the $6.50-7.00 range, where volume profile analysis shows significant historical trading activity. This zone represents the 70% retracement level from the January 2025 ATH, a common inflection point where early buyers from the $20+ range may look to reduce exposure.

The 30-day performance of 46.3% closely mirrors the 24-hour gain of 45.1%, suggesting this rally initiated approximately 30 days ago with steady accumulation rather than a single parabolic move. This gradual buildup contrasts sharply with pump-and-dump patterns, where 24-hour gains typically represent 80-90% of monthly performance.

However, we must note the risk factors embedded in this price structure. The token remains 80.25% below its ATH, and the velocity of this recovery (145% in seven days) introduces short-term overheating risks. Historical analysis of similar rebounds shows that assets gaining 100%+ in weekly timeframes typically experience 25-40% corrections before establishing new support levels.

Market Context and Comparative Analysis

Positioning Venice Token against similar market-cap assets reveals interesting divergences. While the broader mid-cap sector (ranks 150-250) has averaged 12-18% gains over the past seven days, VVV’s 145% performance represents an 8-12x outperformance. This exceptional variance suggests either: (1) fundamental catalysts we’re tracking separately, (2) market correction from prior oversold conditions, or (3) coordinated accumulation by larger stakeholders.

The volume concentration is particularly revealing when we compare VVV’s 29.5% volume-to-mcap ratio against sector averages of 8-12%. This suggests the token is experiencing either a breakout event that’s attracting momentum traders or a re-rating from market participants who previously overlooked the asset. The 1-hour price change of 0.88% indicates consolidation following the initial surge, a healthier pattern than continued parabolic movement.

Our concern centers on the sustainability of this volume. If the $57.6 million represents predominantly retail speculation rather than institutional accumulation, we’d expect rapid volume decay over the next 3-5 days, potentially triggering 30-40% price corrections. Conversely, if volume maintains above $30 million daily, it would signal genuine demand transformation and support higher valuation ranges.

Risk Factors and Downside Scenarios

Several risk vectors merit attention for anyone considering VVV exposure. First, the lack of a maximum supply cap introduces long-term inflation uncertainty—while the current emission rate appears manageable, governance changes could alter tokenomics. Second, the 80% drawdown from ATH indicates this asset experienced severe de-risking, and tokens rarely recover ATH levels without fundamental business model transformation.

Third, the concentration of 44.6% of supply outside circulation creates ongoing sell pressure risk. Even with current strong volume, a coordinated unlock event releasing 5-10 million tokens could overwhelm demand and trigger cascading liquidations. We recommend tracking unlock schedules through on-chain analytics platforms before establishing positions exceeding 2-3% of portfolio allocation.

From a market structure perspective, the rank #180 position places VVV in a precarious zone where exchange support can be inconsistent. Projects between ranks 150-250 frequently experience liquidity fragmentation across exchanges, making large exits difficult without significant slippage. The current volume concentration on 2-3 exchanges amplifies this concern.

Actionable Takeaways for Market Participants

For traders evaluating Venice Token, we identify several key thresholds: (1) Volume sustainability above $30 million daily over the next week would confirm demand transformation; (2) Price consolidation between $4.00-4.80 would establish healthy support structure; (3) Breaking above $6.50 with volume would target the $8-10 range as next resistance cluster.

Conservative participants should wait for the 25-40% correction we anticipate following this parabolic move, establishing entry zones around $3.00-3.50 where previous support formed. Aggressive momentum traders might consider scaling positions at current levels with tight 8-12% stop losses below $4.00, the critical support that emerged from this rally.

The risk-reward calculus depends heavily on whether this represents a fundamental re-rating or technical short squeeze. Our base case assigns 60% probability to a near-term correction to $3.20-3.60 before continuation, 25% probability to immediate breakout above $5.50, and 15% probability to failed rally returning to $2.50-3.00 range. Position sizing should reflect this uncertainty distribution, with maximum 1-2% portfolio allocation for speculative capital only.

Piyasa Fırsatı
GAINS Logosu
GAINS Fiyatı(GAINS)
$0,00755
$0,00755$0,00755
+%0,53
USD
GAINS (GAINS) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

                                                                               Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors.                     Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01