BitcoinWorld US Economic Growth Faces Alarming Slowdown as Government Shutdown Drags – Deutsche Bank Warns WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025: The United States economyBitcoinWorld US Economic Growth Faces Alarming Slowdown as Government Shutdown Drags – Deutsche Bank Warns WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025: The United States economy

US Economic Growth Faces Alarming Slowdown as Government Shutdown Drags – Deutsche Bank Warns

2026/02/16 19:00
Okuma süresi: 6 dk

BitcoinWorld

US Economic Growth Faces Alarming Slowdown as Government Shutdown Drags – Deutsche Bank Warns

WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 2025: The United States economy faces mounting pressure as an extended government shutdown enters its fourth week, with Deutsche Bank analysts warning of significant growth deceleration that could impact global markets and domestic recovery efforts. Recent economic indicators show concerning trends across multiple sectors, prompting financial institutions to revise their forecasts downward while policymakers struggle to reach consensus on funding resolutions.

US Economic Growth Shows Clear Deceleration Patterns

Deutsche Bank’s latest analysis reveals troubling signals across key economic metrics. The bank’s research team has documented measurable slowdowns in consumer spending, business investment, and government procurement. Furthermore, they note that the shutdown’s duration has exceeded initial market expectations, creating compounding effects throughout the economy. Historical data from previous shutdowns indicates that economic impacts accelerate after the three-week mark, a threshold recently crossed in the current situation.

Several specific indicators demonstrate this deceleration. Consumer confidence surveys show a 15% decline since the shutdown began. Small business optimism indexes have dropped to their lowest levels in 18 months. Additionally, federal contract awards have essentially halted, affecting thousands of companies nationwide. The manufacturing sector reports supply chain disruptions due to regulatory approvals backlog, while export documentation delays threaten international trade relationships.

Government Shutdown Creates Multi-Sector Economic Headwinds

The current shutdown represents the longest federal funding lapse in a decade, affecting approximately 800,000 federal employees directly and millions more through contracted services. Economic analysts identify several transmission channels through which the shutdown impacts broader growth. First, reduced government spending immediately removes economic stimulus. Second, uncertainty discourages private investment decisions. Third, delayed regulatory approvals slow business operations across multiple industries.

Deutsche Bank economists have quantified these effects in their latest models. They estimate the shutdown currently reduces quarterly GDP growth by 0.25-0.35 percentage points weekly, with acceleration potential if resolution delays continue. The services sector shows particular vulnerability, as many government-dependent businesses face immediate revenue losses. Tourism and hospitality industries report significant declines in national park visitation and Washington D.C. tourism, traditionally strong economic contributors during this season.

Expert Analysis and Historical Context

Financial institutions have begun adjusting their economic projections based on shutdown duration. Deutsche Bank’s chief U.S. economist notes that previous shutdowns provide valuable comparative data. The 2018-2019 shutdown, lasting 35 days, reduced GDP growth by approximately $11 billion during the affected quarter, though some recovery occurred afterward. However, current economic conditions differ substantially, with higher interest rates and tighter fiscal constraints limiting compensatory mechanisms.

Market reactions have been measured but noticeable. Bond markets show increased demand for short-term Treasury bills as safe-haven assets. Equity markets demonstrate sector-specific volatility, with government contractors and defense companies experiencing notable pressure. Currency markets reflect growing uncertainty, though the dollar’s reserve currency status provides some insulation from more dramatic movements observed in previous episodes.

Key Economic Indicators Under Pressure

Multiple data points confirm the growth slowdown thesis. The table below summarizes critical metrics showing deterioration:

IndicatorPre-Shutdown LevelCurrent LevelChange
Consumer Confidence Index115.298.7-14.3%
Small Business Optimism102.789.4-12.9%
Government Contract Awards$42B monthly$3B monthly-92.9%
Air Travel Security Wait Times15 minutes average45 minutes average+200%

These indicators collectively suggest broader economic impacts beyond direct government operations. The services sector contraction particularly concerns economists, as it represents approximately 80% of U.S. economic activity. Regional Federal Reserve surveys show declining activity in multiple districts, with the Philadelphia and Richmond Fed reports indicating negative momentum in manufacturing and services respectively.

Potential Pathways and Resolution Scenarios

Economic analysts outline several possible resolution scenarios with varying implications. A near-term resolution would likely produce a growth rebound in subsequent quarters, though some permanent economic loss typically occurs. A prolonged shutdown extending beyond six weeks would potentially trigger more structural damage, including permanent business closures and credit market disruptions. Deutsche Bank’s baseline scenario assumes a five-week total duration, resulting in approximately 0.8 percentage points of lost annualized GDP growth.

The Federal Reserve faces complex policy decisions amid the fiscal uncertainty. Previous shutdown episodes have prompted accommodative monetary policy responses, but current inflationary pressures limit such options. Central bank officials have indicated they will monitor shutdown impacts carefully but maintain their data-dependent approach. Market participants increasingly price in delayed rate adjustments as economic uncertainty persists.

International Implications and Global Context

Global economic partners monitor U.S. developments closely, given the nation’s central role in world markets. International trade flows experience disruptions from customs processing delays and export license backlogs. Foreign direct investment decisions may face postponement as investors await resolution clarity. Comparative analysis shows that while other nations experience government funding gaps, the scale and global impact of U.S. shutdowns remain unique among developed economies.

International financial institutions have begun issuing guidance to member nations regarding contingency planning. The International Monetary Fund’s latest global stability report references U.S. fiscal uncertainty as a potential risk factor, though not yet a primary concern. Sovereign wealth funds report maintaining existing U.S. asset allocations while increasing hedging activities against dollar volatility.

Conclusion

Deutsche Bank’s analysis confirms that US economic growth faces measurable deceleration as the government shutdown extends beyond initial expectations. Multiple indicators show deterioration across consumer, business, and government sectors, with potential for accelerated impacts if resolution delays continue. The current situation underscores the interconnectedness of fiscal policy and economic performance, particularly in services-dominated economies. While historical precedents suggest eventual recovery following resolution, the duration and economic context of this shutdown create unique challenges requiring careful monitoring by policymakers, investors, and economic participants globally.

FAQs

Q1: How does Deutsche Bank measure the economic impact of government shutdowns?
Deutsche Bank employs multiple methodologies including econometric modeling of previous shutdowns, real-time indicator tracking, and sector-specific analysis. Their models incorporate direct effects like lost government wages and indirect effects including reduced consumer spending and business investment delays.

Q2: What sectors experience the most significant impacts during government shutdowns?
Government contractors, tourism and hospitality, transportation services, and regulatory-dependent industries typically face immediate impacts. Small businesses serving federal employees or located near government facilities also show disproportionate vulnerability during extended shutdown periods.

Q3: How quickly can economic growth recover after a shutdown ends?
Historical data suggests partial recovery within one quarter, though complete recovery may require multiple quarters. Back pay to federal employees provides immediate stimulus, but delayed business decisions and lost economic activity often represent permanent GDP losses that don’t fully recover.

Q4: What differentiates the current shutdown’s economic impact from previous episodes?
The current economic context features higher interest rates, tighter fiscal constraints, and accumulated pandemic-era economic imbalances. These factors may amplify shutdown impacts and limit traditional recovery mechanisms available during previous episodes.

Q5: How do financial markets typically respond to extended government shutdowns?
Markets generally show increased volatility in affected sectors, with government contractors and defense companies experiencing particular pressure. Broader indices often demonstrate resilience initially, though extended shutdowns typically correlate with declining market sentiment and increased risk premiums across multiple asset classes.

This post US Economic Growth Faces Alarming Slowdown as Government Shutdown Drags – Deutsche Bank Warns first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Lorenzo Protocol Logosu
Lorenzo Protocol Fiyatı(BANK)
$0.04128
$0.04128$0.04128
-0.21%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Paylaş
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

The United States and the United Kingdom are preparing to announce a new agreement on digital assets, with a focus on stablecoins, following high-level talks between senior officials and major industry players.
Paylaş
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 00:49
Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today

Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today

The post Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Altcoins 18 September 2025 | 09:35 The U.S. market is about to see a first-of-its-kind moment in crypto investing. Beginning September 18, investors are expected to be able to buy exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied directly to XRP and Dogecoin, bringing two of the most recognizable digital assets into mainstream brokerage accounts. The products — the REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and REX-Osprey Dogecoin ETF (DOJE) — are being launched through a partnership between REX Shares and Osprey Funds. It marks the first time spot XRP and spot DOGE exposure will be available in ETF form for U.S. traders, a move that analysts describe as historic for the broader digital asset space. Industry voices quickly highlighted the importance of the rollout. ETF Store President Nate Geraci noted that the launch not only introduces the first Dogecoin ETF but also finally delivers spot XRP access for traditional investors. Bloomberg ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart confirmed that trading will begin September 18, following a brief delay from the original timeline. Both ETFs are housed under a single prospectus that also covers planned funds for TRUMP and BONK, though those launches have yet to receive confirmed dates. By wrapping these tokens in an ETF structure, investors will no longer need to navigate crypto exchanges or wallets to gain exposure — instead, access will be as simple as purchasing shares through a brokerage account. The arrival of these products could set the stage for a wave of new altcoin-based ETFs, expanding the landscape beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum and opening the door to mainstream adoption of other popular tokens. Author Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He is fluent in German and has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:38