Abstract:  AI musicians don’t “think” like humans, but they can still surprise you. In producing a full album with Logic Pro’s AI session players, I found myselfAbstract:  AI musicians don’t “think” like humans, but they can still surprise you. In producing a full album with Logic Pro’s AI session players, I found myself

Are AI Musicians Creative? Lessons from a Year in the Studio

2026/02/16 20:56
Okuma süresi: 5 dk

Abstract: 

AI musicians don’t “think” like humans, but they can still surprise you. In producing a full album with Logic Pro’s AI session players, I found myself challenged by their quirks, inspired by their flexibility, and occasionally frustrated by their limitations. This article examines whether creativity can emerge from algorithmic tools—and what their rise means for the next generation of music makers. 

Article: 

The stories are true. I did it. Can’t hide behind any plausible deniability. I worked for a full year in a studio with two AI musicians, functioning as a band I call “Fret Salad.” I played guitars and bass, the AI session musicians handled drums and keyboards. They were an interesting pair to hang out with.  Much different than the myriad musicians I have had the pleasure to make music with over my musical career.  And neither of them owe me money! 

The introduction of Logic Pro’s bass and keyboard “session players” was just the thing I had been looking for. The ability in one program to create a full musical composition, with realistic performances from software players. Using those players avoid working with loops to create your drums. Allowing the drum session player to bring their expertise. The drum controls in Logic Pro are pretty much the most advanced, as they have been around in previous versions. Between the controls you have of the drum activity and the ability to set regions and execute changes in drum style, intensity and complexity throughout the song. 

Likewise, a similar set of controls are in place to control the keyboard player. The players’ sound can again be fine-tuned, with the ability to dictate both left and right hand style. The players also react to other stimuli during the song; sections identified as “verse” are treated different than “chorus” or “outro.” Once again, the ability to create different “regions” and apply different rules, is key. 

While I did put considerable time into working with Logic’s new bass player, I was never fully happy with the results.  It should be somewhat obvious that I have a horse in the race so to speak, as I play bass. I also know what I want to hear in my songs and the session player never produced what I was looking for.  I’m quite pleased with the bass parts I have recorded, thank you very much. 

But I did work extensively with the other two session players, the drums and keyboard versions. Each had quirks and the control you have is within the context of a song and many potential conflicting and overriding directions. 

The drummer handled the job with quiet confidence.  Once you’ve locked in the beat pattern and tempo, you can give the drummer different mixes of marching orders and see what you have.  Overall, I’d say the drummer reacts fairly predictably.  The base beat is there, you control how many fills and the intensity of the attack.  You can change these every few measures, or keep the same one all song long.   

The keyboard player was more nuanced and had some hard-to-define options.  Some of the changes in style were hard to perceive once implemented, perhaps coming out more strongly in different compositions.  While I used the keyboard player to introduce a whole range of synth and instrument sounds in my songs, the player was most compatible with piano and organ sounds.  It was in these instances that the keyboard player interacted the best with the stringed instruments. For both the Steinway Piano and Hammond B3 sounds the session player shines, and I recorded several songs with one or more of these sounds. For the syth, brass and strings, some songs worked better than others.  The Mellotron parts I used in one song are incredible, likely playing exactly what I would have played.  

I interacted with the players enough to know that some experimentation was in order to match my guitar sound with whatever the session keyboard player was playing. Fortunately, within Logic Pro, that experimentation can continue after the recording is done, on both the keyboard sound and the guitar plus effects stack. You can also retroactively choose a drum kit to match the overall sound of the band.  These abilities are game changers. 

While the Session Players in Logic Pro are competent and solid players, they did little to “wow” me.  Don’t get me wrong; they did the job and did it fairly well.  They did so, however, from a safe zone and without taking any real musical risks. But then, I doubt we’d expect anything different. These players also do not solo, in any way. That made the keyboard player a lousy sax player. So that instrument was not used on this album. 

That all being said, the players played their parts effectively. They covered the basics and provided fills and lead-ins as required.  As I stated above, the piano and Hammond B3 players very alive and similar to playing with a human player. Those instruments took the lead and played a major role. The synth, strings and horns each had their own specific style. For example, one of the horn sounds used on the album was described as “grungy horn hits” which are a specific approach independent of player style. 

I think we are in the early stages of AI-based instrument players. My observation is that vocalists will get a lot more attention from the AI community. For vocals, AI can play a unique role in the use of an artist’s instrument. Once that is accomplished, perhaps instruments can receive the same treatment. 

So, after this year-long experience, am I a fan of using AI players? You bet. I miss the humans and will have projects with them again soon, but I’ve added a powerful component to my music-making process.  I’m using it going forward and I expect it will continue to improve. I’d recommend everyone use it to improve and enhance their music.   

Piyasa Fırsatı
THINK Token Logosu
THINK Token Fiyatı(THINK)
$0.0005721
$0.0005721$0.0005721
0.00%
USD
THINK Token (THINK) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Paylaş
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

US and UK Set to Seal Landmark Crypto Cooperation Deal

The United States and the United Kingdom are preparing to announce a new agreement on digital assets, with a focus on stablecoins, following high-level talks between senior officials and major industry players.
Paylaş
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 00:49
Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today

Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today

The post Dogecoin ETF Set to Go Live Today appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Altcoins 18 September 2025 | 09:35 The U.S. market is about to see a first-of-its-kind moment in crypto investing. Beginning September 18, investors are expected to be able to buy exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied directly to XRP and Dogecoin, bringing two of the most recognizable digital assets into mainstream brokerage accounts. The products — the REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and REX-Osprey Dogecoin ETF (DOJE) — are being launched through a partnership between REX Shares and Osprey Funds. It marks the first time spot XRP and spot DOGE exposure will be available in ETF form for U.S. traders, a move that analysts describe as historic for the broader digital asset space. Industry voices quickly highlighted the importance of the rollout. ETF Store President Nate Geraci noted that the launch not only introduces the first Dogecoin ETF but also finally delivers spot XRP access for traditional investors. Bloomberg ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart confirmed that trading will begin September 18, following a brief delay from the original timeline. Both ETFs are housed under a single prospectus that also covers planned funds for TRUMP and BONK, though those launches have yet to receive confirmed dates. By wrapping these tokens in an ETF structure, investors will no longer need to navigate crypto exchanges or wallets to gain exposure — instead, access will be as simple as purchasing shares through a brokerage account. The arrival of these products could set the stage for a wave of new altcoin-based ETFs, expanding the landscape beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum and opening the door to mainstream adoption of other popular tokens. Author Alexander Zdravkov is a person who always looks for the logic behind things. He is fluent in German and has more than 3 years of experience in the crypto space, where he skillfully identifies new…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:38