Jetpack Navigation 3 is a new Google navigation library that is fundamentally different from previous versions. The main idea of Nav3 is simple: you have a NavBackStack — a regular mutable list where each element represents a screen in your application.Jetpack Navigation 3 is a new Google navigation library that is fundamentally different from previous versions. The main idea of Nav3 is simple: you have a NavBackStack — a regular mutable list where each element represents a screen in your application.

Nav3 Router: Convenient Navigation on Top of Jetpack Navigation 3

What is Jetpack Navigation 3?

Jetpack Navigation 3 is a new Google navigation library that is fundamentally different from previous versions. The main idea of Nav3 is simple: you have a NavBackStack — a regular mutable list where each element represents a screen in your application.

\ You add and remove elements from this list, and the UI automatically updates. Each screen is represented as a NavKey — a regular Kotlin class.

\ This gives you full control over navigation, but requires writing quite a lot of boilerplate code for typical operations.

Why Working Directly with NavBackStack is Inconvenient

Let's look at what the code looks like when working directly with NavBackStack:

@Composable fun MyApp() {     val backStack = rememberNavBackStack(Screen.Home)      // Add a screen     backStack.add(Screen.Details("123"))      // Go back     backStack.removeLastOrNull()      // Replace current screen     backStack.set(backStack.lastIndex, Screen.Success) } 

Problems begin when you need to trigger navigation from a ViewModel. You'll have to either pass NavBackStack to the ViewModel (which, in my understanding, violates architectural principles, as I believe the ViewModel shouldn't know about Compose-specific things), or create intermediate callbacks for each navigation action.

\ Additionally, when working with the stack directly, it's easy to forget to handle edge cases.

How Nav3 Router Simplifies the Work

Nav3 Router is a thin wrapper over Navigation 3 that provides a familiar API for navigation. Instead of thinking about indices and list operations, you simply say "go to screen X" or "go back."

\ Important point: Nav3 Router doesn't create its own stack. It works with the same NavBackStack that Navigation 3 provides, just making it more convenient to work with. When you call router.push(Screen.Details), the library translates this into the corresponding operation with the original stack.

\ Main advantages:

  • Can be used from ViewModel
  • Navigation commands are buffered if UI is temporarily unavailable (for example, during screen rotation)
  • All stack operations happen atomically
  • Clear API
  • Flexibility in modification and adding custom behavior

Installation

Nav3 Router is available on Maven Central. Add the dependency to your build.gradle.kts:

// For shared module in KMP project kotlin {     sourceSets {         commonMain.dependencies {             implementation("io.github.arttttt.nav3router:nav3router:1.0.0")         }     } }  // For Android-only project dependencies {     implementation("io.github.arttttt.nav3router:nav3router:1.0.0") } 

\ The library source code is available on GitHub: github.com/arttttt/Nav3Router

How Nav3 Router is Structured

The library consists of three main parts, each solving its own task:

Router — Developer Interface

Router provides methods like push(), pop(), replace(). When you call these methods, Router creates corresponding commands and sends them down the chain. Router itself knows nothing about how navigation will be executed — this allows using it from anywhere.

CommandQueue — Buffer Between Commands and Their Execution

CommandQueue solves the timing problem. Imagine: the user pressed a button during screen rotation. The UI is being recreated, and the navigator is temporarily unavailable. CommandQueue will save the command and execute it as soon as the navigator is ready again. Without this, the command would simply be lost.

// Simplified queue logic class CommandQueue<T : Any> {     private var navigator: Navigator<T>? = null     private val pending = mutableListOf<Command<T>>()      fun executeCommand(command: Command<T>) {         if (navigator != null) {             navigator.apply(command)  // Navigator exists - execute immediately         } else {             pending.add(command)       // No - save for later         }     } } 

Navigator takes commands and applies them to NavBackStack. Important detail: it first creates a copy of the current stack, applies all commands to it, and only then atomically replaces the original stack with the modified copy. This guarantees that the UI will never see intermediate stack states.

// Simplified Navigator logic fun applyCommands(commands: Array<Command>) {     val stackCopy = backStack.toMutableList()  // Work with a copy      for (command in commands) {         when (command) {             is Push -> stackCopy.add(command.screen)             is Pop -> stackCopy.removeLastOrNull()             // ... other commands         }     }      backStack.swap(stackCopy)  // Atomically apply changes } 

Getting Started With Nav3 Router

The simplest way — don't even create Router manually. Nav3Host will do it for you:

@Composable fun App() {     val backStack = rememberNavBackStack(Screen.Home)      // Nav3Host will create Router automatically     Nav3Host(backStack = backStack) { backStack, onBack, router ->         NavDisplay(             backStack = backStack,             onBack = onBack,             entryProvider = entryProvider {                 entry<Screen.Home> {                     HomeScreen(                         onOpenDetails = {                              router.push(Screen.Details)  // Use router                         }                     )                 }                  entry<Screen.Details> {                     DetailsScreen(                         onBack = { router.pop() }                     )                 }             }         )     } } 

For more complex applications, it makes sense to create a Router through DI and pass it to the ViewModel:

\ Define screens

@Serializable sealed interface Screen : NavKey {     @Serializable     data object Home : Screen      @Serializable     data class Product(val id: String) : Screen      @Serializable     data object Cart : Screen } 

\ Pass router to Nav3Host.

@Composable fun App() {     val backStack = rememberNavBackStack(Screen.Home)     val router: Router<Screen> = getSomehowUsingDI()      // Pass Router to Nav3Host     Nav3Host(         backStack = backStack,         router = router,     ) { backStack, onBack, _ ->         NavDisplay(             backStack = backStack,             onBack = onBack,             entryProvider = entryProvider {                 entry<Screen.Home> { HomeScreen() }                 entry<Screen.Details> { DetailsScreen() }             }         )     } } 

\ ViewModel receives Router through constructor.

class ProductViewModel(     private val router: Router<Screen>,     private val cartRepository: CartRepository ) : ViewModel() {      fun addToCart(productId: String) {         viewModelScope.launch {             cartRepository.add(productId)             router.push(Screen.Cart)  // Navigation from ViewModel         }     } } 

\ In UI, just use ViewModel.

@Composable fun ProductScreen(viewModel: ProductViewModel = koinViewModel()) {     Button(onClick = { viewModel.addToCart(productId) }) {         Text("Add to Cart")     } } 

Examples of Typical Scenarios

Simple Forward-Back Navigation

// Navigate to a new screen router.push(Screen.Details(productId))  // Go back router.pop()  // Navigate with replacement of current screen (can't go back) router.replaceCurrent(Screen.Success) 

Working with Screen Chains

// Open multiple screens at once router.push(     Screen.Category("electronics"),     Screen.Product("laptop-123"),     Screen.Reviews("laptop-123") )  // Return to a specific screen // Will remove all screens above Product from the stack router.popTo(Screen.Product("laptop-123")) 

Checkout Scenario

@Composable fun CheckoutScreen(router: Router<Screen>) {     Button(         onClick = {             // After checkout we need to:             // 1. Show confirmation screen             // 2. Prevent going back to cart              router.replaceStack(                 Screen.Home,                 Screen.OrderSuccess(orderId)             )             // Now only Home and OrderSuccess are in the stack         }     ) {         Text("Place Order")     } } 

Exiting Nested Navigation

// User is deep in settings: // Home -> Settings -> Account -> Privacy -> DataManagement  // "Done" button should return to home Button(     onClick = {         // Will leave only root (Home)         router.clearStack()     } ) {     Text("Done") }  // Or if you need to close the app from anywhere Button(     onClick = {         // Will leave only current screen and trigger system back         router.dropStack()     } ) {     Text("Exit") } 

Bonus: SceneStrategy and Dialogs

So far, we've only talked about simple navigation between screens. But what if you need to show a dialog or bottom sheet? This is where the SceneStrategy concept from Navigation 3 comes to help.

What is SceneStrategy?

SceneStrategy is a mechanism that determines exactly how screens from your stack will be displayed. By default, Navigation 3 uses SinglePaneSceneStrategy, which simply shows the last screen from the stack. But you can create your own strategies for more complex scenarios.

\ Think of SceneStrategy as a director who looks at your stack of screens and decides: "Okay, these three screens we show normally, but this last one — as a modal window on top of the previous ones". This allows representing different UI patterns with the same stack.

Creating a Strategy for ModalBottomSheet

Let's create a strategy that will show certain screens as bottom sheets. First, let's define how we'll mark such screens:

@Serializable sealed interface Screen : NavKey {     @Serializable     data object Home : Screen      @Serializable     data class Product(val id: String) : Screen      // This screen will be shown as bottom sheet     @Serializable     data object Filters : Screen } 

\ Now, let's create the strategy itself. It will check the metadata of the last screen and, if it finds a special marker, show it as a bottom sheet:

class BottomSheetSceneStrategy<T : Any> : SceneStrategy<T> {      companion object {         // Metadata key by which we identify bottom sheet         private const val BOTTOM_SHEET_KEY = "bottomsheet"          // Helper function to create metadata         fun bottomSheet(): Map<String, Any> {             return mapOf(BOTTOM_SHEET_KEY to true)         }     }      @Composable     override fun calculateScene(         entries: List<NavEntry<T>>,         onBack: (Int) -> Unit     ): Scene<T>? {         val lastEntry = entries.lastOrNull() ?: return null          // Check if the last screen has bottom sheet marker         val isBottomSheet = lastEntry.metadata[BOTTOM_SHEET_KEY] as? Boolean          if (isBottomSheet == true) {             // Return special Scene for bottom sheet             return BottomSheetScene(                 entry = lastEntry,                 previousEntries = entries.dropLast(1),                 onBack = onBack             )         }          // This is not a bottom sheet, let another strategy handle it         return null     } } 

Combining Multiple Strategies

In a real application, you might need bottom sheets, dialogs, and regular screens. For this, you can create a delegate strategy that will choose the right strategy for each screen:

class DelegatedScreenStrategy<T : Any>(     private val strategyMap: Map<String, SceneStrategy<T>>,     private val fallbackStrategy: SceneStrategy<T> ) : SceneStrategy<T> {      @Composable     override fun calculateScene(         entries: List<NavEntry<T>>,         onBack: (Int) -> Unit     ): Scene<T>? {         val lastEntry = entries.lastOrNull() ?: return null          // Check all keys in metadata         for (key in lastEntry.metadata.keys) {             val strategy = strategyMap[key]             if (strategy != null) {                 // Found suitable strategy                 return strategy.calculateScene(entries, onBack)             }         }          // Use default strategy         return fallbackStrategy.calculateScene(entries, onBack)     } } 

Using in Application

Now, let's put it all together. Here's what using bottom sheet looks like in a real application:

@Composable fun ShoppingApp() {     val backStack = rememberNavBackStack(Screen.Home)     val router = rememberRouter<Screen>()      Nav3Host(         backStack = backStack,         router = router     ) { backStack, onBack, router ->         NavDisplay(             backStack = backStack,             onBack = onBack,             // Use our combined strategy             sceneStrategy = DelegatedScreenStrategy(                 strategyMap = mapOf(                     "bottomsheet" to BottomSheetSceneStrategy(),                     "dialog" to DialogSceneStrategy()  // Navigation 3 already has this strategy                 ),                 fallbackStrategy = SinglePaneSceneStrategy()  // Regular screens             ),             entryProvider = entryProvider {                 entry<Screen.Home> {                     HomeScreen(                         onOpenFilters = {                             // Open filters as bottom sheet                             router.push(Screen.Filters)                         }                     )                 }                  entry<Screen.Product> { screen ->                     ProductScreen(productId = screen.id)                 }                  // Specify that Filters should be bottom sheet                 entry<Screen.Filters>(                     metadata = BottomSheetSceneStrategy.bottomSheet()                 ) {                     FiltersContent(                         onApply = { filters ->                             // Apply filters and close bottom sheet                             applyFilters(filters)                             router.pop()                         }                     )                 }             }         )     } } 

\ What's happening here? When you call router.push(Screen.Filters), the screen is added to the stack as usual. But thanks to metadata and our strategy, the UI understands that this screen needs to be shown as a bottom sheet on top of the previous screen, rather than replacing it completely.

\ When calling router.pop() the bottom sheet will close, and you'll return to the previous screen. From Router's point of view, this is regular back navigation, but visually it looks like closing a modal window.

Advantages of This Approach

Using SceneStrategy provides several important advantages. First, your navigation logic remains simple — you still use push and pop without thinking about how exactly the screen will be shown. Second, navigation state remains consistent — bottom sheet is just another screen in the stack that is properly saved during screen rotation or process kill. And finally, it provides great flexibility — you can easily change how a screen is displayed by just changing its metadata, without touching the navigation logic.

\ This approach is especially useful when the same screen can be shown differently depending on context. For example, a login screen can be a regular screen on first app launch and a modal dialog when attempting to perform an action that requires authorization.

Why You Should Use Nav3 Router

Nav3 Router doesn't try to replace Navigation 3 or add new features. Its task is to make working with navigation convenient and predictable. You get a simple API that can be used from any layer of the application, automatic handling of timing issues, and the ability to easily test navigation logic.

\ At the same time, under the hood, regular Navigation 3 still works with all its capabilities: state saving, animation support, and proper handling of the system "Back" button.

\ If you're already using Navigation 3 or planning to migrate to it, Nav3 Router will help make this experience more pleasant without adding unnecessary complexity to the project.

  • GitHub repository: github.com/arttttt/Nav3Router
  • Usage examples: see sample folder in the repository

\

Market Opportunity
TOP Network Logo
TOP Network Price(TOP)
$0.000096
$0.000096$0.000096
0.00%
USD
TOP Network (TOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama unveils innovative public token auction, using proprietary encryption. Bidding begins January 21, 2026. Key details on protocol and market impact.Read more
Share
Coinstats2026/01/20 18:13
Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

The federal funds rate now stands in a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, a level that reflects a delicate balancing […] The post Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:01