Bitcoin’s Quantum Dilemma: Is BIP-361 a Security Shield or Legalized Theft?
The debate over Bitcoin’s immutability has reached a boiling point. As we approach the 2030s, the “Quantum Threat” is no longer science fiction. A new proposal, BIP-361, suggests invalidating old digital signatures to prevent potential North Korean quantum attacks by 2033.
The Controversy: Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has slammed the proposal, labeling it “shitcoin land.” The plan involves a strict 5-year timeline: if Satoshi Nakamoto (or any early holder) doesn’t move their coins to a quantum-resistant address, those 1.1 million BTC become “frozen” or invalid.
The Core Conflict:
- Security: Preventing a $70B+ theft that could crash the network.
- Principles: Violating the “not your keys, not your coins” mantra by forcing address invalidation.
Is the survival of the network worth breaking its most sacred rule? Read more on why this soft fork might be the most contested moment in Bitcoin history.
Bitcoin’s Quantum Dilemma: Is BIP-361 a Security Shield or Legalized Theft? was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
You May Also Like
Best Cryptos to Buy Now: Jamie Dimon Signals JPMorgan Entry Into Prediction Markets and Pepeto Might Shock Traders This Year While BNB and TRX Hold Steady
68% of global BTC miners came from the U.S., Russia, and China, Q1 2026
