Charles Hoskinson has launched a review of decentralized governance systems to improve Cardano’s decision-making structure. The Cardano founder is analyzing more than 11,000 DAOs and governance research. The move follows tensions over treasury proposals and the role of delegated representatives.
Charles Hoskinson said he is reviewing over 11,000 DAOs and governance studies. He aims to identify improvements for Cardano’s governance framework. He stated that the research includes blockchain systems and traditional organizational models. The goal is to apply proven governance practices to Cardano.

Hoskinson said findings could lead to constitutional changes and new governance tools. These changes may reshape how proposals and treasury funds are handled. The review comes during a period of governance disputes within the Cardano ecosystem. Concerns have emerged over proposal approvals and treasury allocations.
Cardano introduced decentralized governance to distribute decision-making power. However, disagreements have slowed progress on key proposals. Hoskinson described the current period as one of the most divisive phases. He said improvements are needed to strengthen long-term governance efficiency.
Input Output Global submitted nine treasury proposals seeking ecosystem funding. Six proposals passed, while three failed to meet approval thresholds. The rejected proposals included projects linked to Pogun, Blockfrost, and Layer-2 scaling. Voting outcomes reflected divided opinions among delegated representatives. IOG’s larger research proposal remains under review with strong opposition. More than 70% of votes are against it before the June 8, 2026 deadline.
Some DReps argued that funds should focus on critical sectors. Iagon CEO Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal said research efforts already exist in the ecosystem. Other DReps warned that rejecting infrastructure proposals could limit growth. They said innovation depends on continued funding for research and development.
Hoskinson said he is considering becoming a delegated representative. The idea triggered mixed reactions from ADA holders. Supporters said his involvement could improve coordination and execution. They also indicated willingness to delegate their voting power to him.
Critics argued that the move could concentrate influence within the network. Some described it as “gerrymandering” and raised concerns about fairness. The community continues to debate governance changes and leadership roles. Voting on the research proposal remains open until June 8, 2026.
The post Charles Hoskinson Reviews 11K DAOs After IOG Proposal Setbacks appeared first on CoinCentral.


