The post Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders.  Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads.  Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation. What launchpads were meant to be Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support.  As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether.  The problem with ‘launch whatever’  Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow. Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus… The post Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders.  Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads.  Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation. What launchpads were meant to be Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support.  As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether.  The problem with ‘launch whatever’  Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow. Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus…

Launchpads Are Funding Ideas, Not Products

Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ

Launchpads were introduced to give Web3 projects access to early investors. As they operate today, however, they too often result in cash grabs over long-term success. This has resulted in a flood of half-formed products hitting the market without real support for builders. 

Virtuals Protocol has facilitated over 17,000 AI agent token launches as of February 2025, indicating that infrastructure for token launches is not slowing down. Questions remain, however, regarding the long-term sustainability and accountability of launchpads. 

Projects with no substance are securing funding, ultimately resulting in failure, reflecting a deeper problem in the industry. Launchpads have become hollow funnels that fund projects without requiring a real product or technical foundation.

What launchpads were meant to be

Designed as the meeting point for builders and believers, launchpads help new projects raise funds and increase brand awareness while allowing global investors to get in early on promising technologies. This approach helps fill a significant gap by making it easier for teams to access funds and community support. 

As the industry has matured, this model has revealed its limitations. Many launchpads remain focused on raising funds rather than achieving long-term success. In this sense, they are stuck in the past, acting like decentralized Shark Tanks rather than engines of innovation. Instead of leading the way for technical innovation, launchpads have removed it as a category altogether. 

The problem with ‘launch whatever’ 

Many launchpads pride themselves on being chain-agnostic, positioning themselves as neutral arenas for protocols to raise funds. This neutrality also creates a lack of focus and standards, turning themselves into free-for-alls that fail to help the best projects stand out and grow.

Some argue that innovation should not be policed, and anyone should be able to fundraise. But without a focus on genuine, sophisticated tech or clear guardrails for token design, launchpads become a cut-throat arena where no one wins. Investors are bombarded with half-baked pitches and superficial hype cycles while builders try to raise capital without meaningful support. 

Related: Grayscale adds AI launchpads, Solana DeFi apps to Q1 2025 top tokens

This approach worked for earlier iterations of Web3 projects, which prioritized token distribution over long-term growth. However, this model no longer benefits this market. The days of quick wins and low-effort launches are no more. With increased regulatory scrutiny, the next generation of launchpads must move beyond theory and into action, only launching projects with real products. 

Developers need better infrastructure

Most builders juggle three to four disconnected tools to ship a project. There are numerous factors to consider, including building backends, maintaining costs, server hosting and security systems. It’s no surprise that promising projects stall before they even begin properly.

Building a real product requires a lot of work. Traditional launchpads have narrowly focused on helping projects raise capital. But capital doesn’t help solve operational bottlenecks. Builders, especially those without deep pockets or pedigrees, need launchpads that support them end-to-end to simplify the entire journey. 

The ethos of launchpads needs to be: ‘giving builders the tools they need to focus on their products,’ not on patching together the scaffolding around them as they go.

Projects need multi-agent support

Beyond better tooling, launchpads need to evolve to enable developers to build genuinely powerful applications that solve real user problems. Instead of simply deploying token contracts, modern platforms must provide the infrastructure for creating applications with real utility, user adoption and revenue generation.

As 2025 has become the year of AI agents, projects will capitalize by introducing a robust platform for building applications first, then building a launchpad around those applications. This creates a cycle where successful applications drive platform adoption, attracting more developers and creating network effects of valuable applications, builders and users solving real problems at scale.

Building better, not just raising more

If launchpads want to be part of the solution, they must get out of their own way. They are uniquely positioned to drive technical innovation, but we won’t have better projects without better tools.

The next generation of launchpads must move past token distribution toward helping builders build better. This means providing end-to-end support through building and growing products, and offering clear incentives and guardrails to ensure everyone’s interests are aligned. 

Opinion by: Tim Hafner, founder and CEO of OpenServ.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/launchpads-funding-ideas-not-products?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.000541
$0.000541$0.000541
+0.98%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Australia Alters Game Plan for Stablecoin Rules

Australia Alters Game Plan for Stablecoin Rules

The post Australia Alters Game Plan for Stablecoin Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is taking a significant step in redefining its financial regulatory landscape by introducing new exemptions for stablecoin intermediaries. This move allows these entities to bypass the requirement of holding additional financial services licenses. Continue Reading:Australia Alters Game Plan for Stablecoin Rules Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/australia-alters-game-plan-for-stablecoin-rules
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 20:48
‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

The post ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mira (voice of May Hong), Rumi (Arden Cho) and Zoey (
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 23:28