Howard Lutnick said that Taiwan must help America produce up to half of the chips required for domestic use.Howard Lutnick said that Taiwan must help America produce up to half of the chips required for domestic use.

Lutnick says Taiwan must help America produce up to half of local chips

The United States has increased pressure on Taiwan to relocate a portion of its semiconductor production to the country. Howard Lutnick said that Taiwan must help America produce up to half of the chips required for domestic use. 

The U.S. cited geopolitical threats and supply chain vulnerabilities as it pushed for a reduction in its reliance on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). Lutnick argued during an interview with NewsNation that moving a substantial capacity of semiconductor production into the U.S. is necessary to counter the risk of Chinese aggression towards Taiwan. 

America eyes 50% global chip share as domestic output lags below 10%

Howard Lutnick emphasized during his interview that Taiwan should let the U.S. produce 50% of chip-making and wafers for local consumption. Lutnick went further, suggesting that Taiwan’s cooperation would be directly tied to U.S. defense support. He pointed out a question: How will the U.S. protect it if Taiwan has 95% of the global semiconductor supply? 

Washington is encouraging domestic chipmaking through subsidies, investment agreements, and regulatory pressures. In March, Trump announced a deal with TSMC for a $100 billion U.S. investment in fabrication plants, packaging facilities, and R&D centers, building on the earlier $65 billion pledge. TSMC has committed around $165 billion to the U.S operations so far.

The Trump administration is also considering additional trade measures, such as steep tariffs and a possible 1:1 production mandate, which would require companies to manufacture as many chips in the U.S. as they import. The escalation could help reshore advanced semiconductor manufacturing into the country. 

The U.S. currently produces less than 10% of the world’s chips and an even smaller proportion of the most advanced logic devices. To reach atleast 40% of the global supply, Lutnick estimated that an investment of roughly $500 billion is required. Bloomberg’s report highlighted that moving production to the U.S. would be costly, time-consuming, and disruptive due to the complex nature of semiconductor industrial processes, which rely on specialty components and materials from specialized firms. 

Karen Kuo, a spokesperson for the Presidential Office, noted in March that TSMC will not transfer its most advanced chip manufacturing to foreign facilities, citing the government’s N-1 policy, which requires overseas fabs to remain at least one generation behind domestic plants. 

TSMC stock is down 1.5% today following Lutnick’s remarks

Taiwan also amended the Industrial Innovation bill in April to impose fines of up to NT$10 million ($310,000) for unauthorized foreign investments. The amendment allowed the government to block projects deemed risky to national security and economic stability.

Meanwhile, TSMC has been expanding its presence in the U.S., with operations in Arizona for its four-nanometer fab and a three-nanometer fab facility expected to launch in 2028. It also plans to launch a two-nanometer fab by 2029. The firm operates design centers in Texas, California, and Washington. 

TSMC stock is down 1.5% today, trading at $ 1,300 from a previous close of $ 1,320. However, the stock’s YTD performance of up 22.07% shows that it maintained strong investor confidence in the semiconductor business. 

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the risks of concentrated chip production, which can disrupt industries ranging from automotive to AI and defense due to supply chain disruptions. Lutnick emphasized that reducing overdependence on Taiwan is essential to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future. Despite resistance from Taiwan, Lutnick revealed that it will come as a shock to everybody how successful the U.S. is. As of now, it remains uncertain if Washington will be able to pull off the plan.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record

The post ‘Sinners’ Earns 16 Oscar Nominations, Shattering All-Time Record appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline “Sinners” shattered a 75-year-old record
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:34
‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years

The post ‘Return To Silent Hill’ Is The Worst-Reviewed Video Game Movie In 19 Years appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Return to Silent Hil Return to Silent Hil
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/23 02:19