The post Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Getty Images In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven. “Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.” Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.” The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.” The History Of Beards In The Military The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.” Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen. General… The post Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Getty Images In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven. “Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.” Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.” The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.” The History Of Beards In The Military The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.” Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen. General…

Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Getty Images

In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven.

“Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.”

Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.”

The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.”

The History Of Beards In The Military

The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.”

Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen.

General Ulysses Simpson Grant (1822 – 1885) was far from the only officer to wear a beard in the American Civil War (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Those points may have been lost on Secretary Hegseth, who has called for the United States military to return a “warrior ethos.” In other words, what could be more symbolic of a modern warrior than a full beard?

The End Of Beards

It was only in the First World War, with its horrific trench warfare that spread lice and disease, that military leaders began to see the benefits of short hair and a clean-shaven face. Until that point, it was actually understood that beards were seen as protection from the weather, but could also serve as a respiratory system to keep out bad air and dust.

With the introduction of poison gas, soldiers needed to don gas masks that fit close to the skin, and it was found that being clean-shaven helped create a tighter seal. That is even truer today, as gas mask technology has undergone significant improvements. A beard can impair the effectiveness of chemical and biological protection systems.

Following the conflict, the troops returned home clean-shaven, while only the senior officers, who had spent the conflict safely behind the lines, kept their beards. That diminished the idea that a beard was a symbol of heroism.

That resulted in changing fashion trends, and in the UK, King George V was the last monarch to have a full beard. By the time of the Second World War, beards were entirely out of fashion, even among the highest-ranking officials.

Medical Waivers Now Limited To A Year

Although beards are far less common in the U.S. military, there have been exceptions to the rule. Now those rules may be tightening. Even before Hegseth’s address on September 30, the Pentagon had issued new guidance that called for significantly reducing the number of medical waivers.

“Unit commanders will initiate separation of service members who require a shaving waiver after more than 1 year of medical treatment,” Hegseth wrote in an August 20, 2025, memo to senior military leadership. “The grooming standard set by the U.S. military is to be clean-shaven and neat in presentation for a proper military appearance.”

This policy isn’t a significant change, as beards had been banned for decades, with leaders arguing that they looked unprofessional and interfered with gas masks and oxygen masks. However, a waiver has been granted for those who suffer from pseudofolliculitis barbae, also known as PFB or razor bumps. The skin condition, which is caused by ingrown hairs and can make shaving painful, is more common among Black men.

Instead of permanent waivers, evaluations will be conducted annually and may not be extended beyond that period. The message was to cut the beard or be cut from the service.

Religious Waivers Also Got Shaved!

Hegseth’s comment about “Nordic Pagans” may have sounded like a throwaway joke, but it may have been carefully directed. It was during President Donald Trump’s first term that Sgt. 1st Class Benjamin Hopper, then a member of the Nevada Army National Guard’s 3665th Ordnance Company, was granted a beard waiver, as he claimed to practice “Norse paganism,” which encourages the growth of a beard, or “skegg.”

There aren’t many Nordic Pagans, but Hegseth may be looking to counter other religious waivers, which have increasingly been granted to Sikhs, Muslims, and Jews, all of whom may wear beards for religious reasons.

U.S. Army Captain Kamaljeet Singh Kalsi was allowed to serve while wearing his turban and beard, as it was required by his faith. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Hegseth’s recent memos have indicated that the U.S. military will still allow those religious exceptions, but troops will need to provide documentation that shows “the sincerity of their religious or sincerely held belief.” Moreover, it stated, “Approvals will be limited to non-deployable roles with low risk of chemical attack or firefighting requirements.”

One Big Beard Exception

There may be some irony that approvals for beards would be limited to “non-deployable roles,” as Hegseth also stated, “If you want a beard, you can join Special Forces. If not, then shave.”

That begs the question of why the elite forces don’t need a waiver, and instead are simply allowed to grow beards.

U.S. Army Special Forces soldier nicknamed “Cowboy” secures an airstrip during an operation August 28, 2002 in the town of Taloquan in Northern Afghanistan. Beards like his could still be allowed for Special Forces (Photo by Scott Nelson/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The standard argument is that United States Special Forces grow beards to facilitate camouflage, but the facial hair also serves as a means of “cultural integration.” Beards enable personnel to blend in with local populations, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, where beards are common and often signal trust.

It has been further suggested that beards can filter dust and provide warmth, beliefs not all that dissimilar from those of the 19th century.

Yet, if those reasons are acceptable, it would seem odd that medical waivers are being scrutinized, not to mention the religious exemptions.

Finally, as the United States military pivots to great power competition and sees a potential war with China in the future, the argument for allowing Special Forces to wear beards but not other warfighters seems questionable. Beards are far from commonplace in China and other parts of East Asia. It could make those personnel stand out rather than blend in.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2025/10/04/hegseth-has-said-no-beards-will-limit-religious-and-medical-waivers/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

The post Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jonah Wren Phillips in “Bring Her Back.” A24 Bring Her Back, a new A24 horror movie from the filmmakers of the smash hit Talk to Me, is coming soon to HBO Max. Bring Her Back opened in theaters on May 30 before debuting on digital streaming via premium video on demand on July 1. The official logline for Bring Her Back reads, “A brother and sister uncover a terrifying ritual at the secluded home of their new foster mother.” Forbes‘South Park’ Season 27 Updated Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?By Tim Lammers Directed by twin brothers Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou, Bring Her Back stars Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Philips, Sally–Anne Upton, Stephen Philips, Mischa Heywood and Sally Hawkins. Warner Bros. Discovery announced on Wednesday that Bring Her Back will arrive on streaming on HBO Max on Friday, Oct. 3, and on HBO linear on Saturday, Oct. 4, at 8 p.m. ET. Prior to the debut of Bring Her Back on HBO on Oct. 4, the cable outlet will air the Philippou brothers’ 2022 horror hit Talk to Me. ForbesHit Horror Thriller ’28 Years Later’ Is New On Netflix This WeekBy Tim Lammers For viewers who don’t have HBO Max, the streaming platform offers three tiers: The ad-based tier costs $9.99 per month, while an ad-free tier is $16.99 per month. Additionally, an ad-free tier with 4K Ultra HD programming costs $20.99 per month. The Success Of ‘Talk To Me’ Weighed On The Minds Of Philippou Brothers While Making ‘Bring Her Back’ During the film’s theatrical run, Bring Her Back earned $19.3 million domestically and nearly $19.8 million internationally for a worldwide box office tally of $39.1 million. Bring Her Back had a production budget of $17 million before prints and advertising, according to The Numbers.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:23
XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13