The study proposes that the core-accretion and migration model best explains the presence of hot Jupiters, with the inner gas disk halting their inward journey.The study proposes that the core-accretion and migration model best explains the presence of hot Jupiters, with the inner gas disk halting their inward journey.

Are We on the Verge of a Breakthrough in Understanding Planet Formation?

2025/10/07 04:09
9 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Abstract and 1 Introduction

  1. Sample selection and properties

  2. Results

  3. Discussion

  4. Concluding remarks and References

    Appendix A: Sample selection

    Appendix B: Properties of the TOIs in this work

    Appendix C: Pre-MS estimates

5. Concluding remarks

The lack of a solid observational background on exoplanets around intermediate-mass stars (analogous to the background present around low-mass stars) affects our knowledge of planet formation in general and of hot Jupiters in particular. In this work we have analysed such type of planets, selected from a combination of TESS and Gaia data. Our analysis has focused on the physical limit of their innermost planetary orbits, regardless of the ongoing debate on the frequency of hot Jupiters around intermediate-mass stars (e.g., Sebastian et al. 2022, and references therein). In principle, our analysis is also independent of observational developments that would eventually lead to larger samples of intermediate-mass stars hosting smaller exoplanets at longer orbital radii. We provide tentative evidence to support the notion that hot Jupiters’ orbits around intermediate-mass stars are mostly determined by the protoplanetary disk gas-truncation radius – and not by the dust-destruction radius. Although gravitational instabilities may play a role in the formation of long-period giant planets around such stars, we have suggested that the origin of hot Jupiters is probably similar than it is for lower-mass sources. This is based on a combination between the core-accretion paradigm and migration up to the inner gas edge. Finally, the comparison between low- and intermediate-mass stars suggests that the gas barrier indeed fixes the innermost planetary orbits for the whole stellar mass regime. Future tests of the previous hypothesis require larger samples of intermediate-mass stars with hot Jupiters. Two examples of such types of tests are outlined below.

\ First, the size of the magnetosphere is limited by the disk co-rotation radius, which is smaller for larger stellar rotational velocities (Shu et al. 1994). Thus, if the magnetosphere controls the innermost planetary orbits these should be smaller for fastrotating stars (see, e.g., the related discussion in Lee & Chiang 2017). This is in agreement with the recent finding, showing that shorter orbital periods are observed in more massive stars with shorter rotational periods, at least considering FGK spectral types (García et al. 2023). However, it is hard to make a conclusive test only based on low-mass stars, given their narrow range of small projected rotational velocities. In contrast, velocities of intermediate-mass stars span from a few to a few hundred km/s, making them ideal for such a test. Gaia-based projected rotational velocities are presently only available for a dozen of all the sources analyzed in this work. Additional velocity estimates will be helpful in carrying out this task.

\ Second, that magnetospheres act as gas barriers ceasing inward migration immediately implies that if those are absent, then the probability that planets are swallowed by their host stars increases (Nelson et al. 2000). Indirect evidence of planets swallowed by their hosts have been provided only for a few solar-type stars (e.g., Israelian et al. 2001; De et al. 2023, and references therein). Notably, magnetospheres are likely to be lacking in most Herbig stars with masses & 3-4 M⊙ (Wichittanakom et al. 2020; Vioque et al. 2022), for which the gas disk may reach the central source trough a boundary layer (Mendigutía 2020, and references therein). Thus, if magnetospheres are the ultimate barrier preventing unlimited planet migration, then the planet engulfment scenario would be most efficient for stellar masses of > 3-4 M⊙. These stars may show a deficit of hot Jupiters, as compared to the case of less massive stars.

\ Acknowledgements. The authors acknowledge the anonymous referee, whose suggestions have served to improve the manuscript. IM’s research is funded by grants PID2022-138366NA-I00, by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union, and by a Ramón y Cajal fellowship RyC2019-026992-I. J.L.-B. is partly funded by the Spanish MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and NextGenerationEU/PRTR grants PID2019-107061GB-C61 and CNS2023- 144309, and by the Ramón y Cajal fellowship RYC2021-031640-I. BM is supported by grant MCIN/AEI/PID2021-127289-NB-I00. We acknowledge the use of public TOI Release data from pipelines at the TESS Science Office and at the TESS Science Processing Operations Center. Funding for the TESS mission is provided by NASA’s Science Mission directorate. This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.

\

References

Baruteau, C., Meru, F., & Paardekooper, S.-J. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1971

\ Batygin, K., Adams, F. C., & Becker, J. 2023, ApJ, 951, L19

\ Benkendorff, L., Flammini Dotti, F., Stock, K., Cai, M. X., & Spurzem, R. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2834

\ Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977

\ Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923

\ Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Harries, T. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Romanova, M. M. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 479

\ Brittain, S. D., Kamp, I., Meeus, G., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 2023, Space Sci. Rev., 219, 7

\ Cantiello, M. & Braithwaite, J. 2019, ApJ, 883, 106

\ Creevey, O. L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A26

\ De, K., MacLeod, M., Karambelkar, V., et al. 2023, Nature, 617, 55

\ Dong, R., Najita, J. R., & Brittain, S. 2018, ApJ, 862, 103

\ Drazkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717

\ Flock, M., Turner, N. J., Mulders, G. D., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A147

\ Fouesneau, M., Frémat, Y., Andrae, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A28

\ Gaia Collaboration, Arenou, F., Babusiaux, C., et al. 2023a, A&A, 674, A34

\ Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1

\ Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023b, A&A, 674, A1

\ Gammie, C. F. 2001, ApJ, 553, 174

\ García, R. A., Gourvès, C., Santos, A. R. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, L12

\ Giacalone, S., Dressing, C. D., Jensen, E. L. N., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 24

\ Gravity Collaboration, Wojtczak, J. A., Labadie, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A59

\ Guerrero, N. M., Seager, S., Huang, C. X., et al. 2021, ApJS, 254, 39

\ Hussain, G. A. J. & Alecian, E. 2014, in Magnetic Fields throughout Stellar Evolution, ed. P. Petit, M. Jardine, & H. C. Spruit, Vol. 302, 25–37

\ Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., & Rebolo, R. 2001, Nature, 411, 163

\ Kley, W. & Nelson, R. P. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 211

\ Koenigl, A. 1991, ApJ, 370, L39

\ Koumpia, E., de Wit, W. J., Oudmaijer, R. D., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A109

\ Kunimoto, M. & Matthews, J. M. 2020, AJ, 159, 248

\ Lee, E. J. & Chiang, E. 2017, ApJ, 842, 40

\ Lillo-Box, J., Morales-Calderón, M., Barrado, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.06316

\ Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. 1996, Nature, 380, 606

\ Marcos-Arenal, P., Mendigutía, I., Koumpia, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A68

\ Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355

\ Mendigutía, I. 2020, Galaxies, 8, 39

\ Mendigutía, I., Solano, E., Vioque, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A66

\ Michael, S., Durisen, R. H., & Boley, A. C. 2011, ApJ, 737, L42

\ Monnier, J. D. & Millan-Gabet, R. 2002, ApJ, 579, 694

\ Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., & Apai, D. 2015, ApJ, 798, 112

\ Mulders, G. D., Pascucci, I., Ciesla, F. J., & Fernandes, R. B. 2021, ApJ, 920, 66

\ Nelson, R. P., Papaloizou, J. C. B., Masset, F., & Kley, W. 2000, MNRAS, 318, 18

\ Pinte, C., Ménard, F., Berger, J. P., Benisty, M., & Malbet, F. 2008, ApJ, 673, L63

\ Ribas, Á., Bouy, H., & Merín, B. 2015, A&A, 576, A52

\ Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003

\ Romanova, M. M., Lii, P. S., Koldoba, A. V., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2666

\ Salaris, M. & Cassisi, S. 2006, Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations

\ Sebastian, D., Guenther, E. W., Deleuil, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 636

\ Shu, F., Najita, J., Ostriker, E., et al. 1994, ApJ, 429, 781

\ Siess, L., Dufour, E., & Forestini, M. 2000, A&A, 358, 593

\ Simon, T., Ayres, T. R., Redfield, S., & Linsky, J. L. 2002, ApJ, 579, 800

\ Stassun, K. G., Feiden, G. A., & Torres, G. 2014, New A Rev., 60, 1

\ Tarrants, T. & Mendes, E. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.12380

\ Tuthill, P. G., Monnier, J. D., & Danchi, W. C. 2001, Nature, 409, 1012

\ Vioque, M., Oudmaijer, R. D., Wichittanakom, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 39

\ Wichittanakom, C., Oudmaijer, R. D., Fairlamb, J. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 234

\ Yee, S. W. & Winn, J. N. 2023, ApJ, 949, L21

\ Zhou, G., Huang, C. X., Bakos, G. Á., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 141

\ Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., & Calvet, N. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2883

\

:::info Authors:

(1) I. Mendigutía, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(2) J. Lillo-Box, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(3) M. Vioque, European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching bei München, Germany and Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago 763-0355, Chile;

(4) J. Maldonado, INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, I-90134 Palermo, Italy;

(8) B. Montesinos, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(6) N. Huélamo, Centro de Astrobiología (CAB), CSIC-INTA, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain;

(7) J. Wang, Departamento de Física Teórica, Módulo 15, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.08034
$0.08034$0.08034
+0.18%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

The post BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock is steering $185 billion worth of model portfolios deeper into US stocks and artificial intelligence. The decision came this week as the asset manager adjusted its entire model suite, increasing its equity allocation and dumping exposure to international developed markets. The firm now sits 2% overweight on stocks, after money moved between several of its biggest exchange-traded funds. This wasn’t a slow shuffle. Billions flowed across multiple ETFs on Tuesday as BlackRock executed the realignment. The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) alone brought in $3.4 billion, the largest single-day haul in its history. The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) collected $2.3 billion, while the iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) added nearly $2 billion. The rebalancing triggered swift inflows and outflows that realigned investor exposure on the back of performance data and macroeconomic outlooks. BlackRock raises equities on strong US earnings The model updates come as BlackRock backs the rally in American stocks, fueled by strong earnings and optimism around rate cuts. In an investment letter obtained by Bloomberg, the firm said US companies have delivered 11% earnings growth since the third quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, earnings across other developed markets barely touched 2%. That gap helped push the decision to drop international holdings in favor of American ones. Michael Gates, lead portfolio manager for BlackRock’s Target Allocation ETF model portfolio suite, said the US market is the only one showing consistency in sales growth, profit delivery, and revisions in analyst forecasts. “The US equity market continues to stand alone in terms of earnings delivery, sales growth and sustainable trends in analyst estimates and revisions,” Michael wrote. He added that non-US developed markets lagged far behind, especially when it came to sales. This week’s changes reflect that position. The move was made ahead of the Federal…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:44
Oil Jumps Above $90 as Iran Tensions Rise, Crypto Markets React

Oil Jumps Above $90 as Iran Tensions Rise, Crypto Markets React

The post Oil Jumps Above $90 as Iran Tensions Rise, Crypto Markets React appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto sells off with Bitcoin as the Fear and Greed
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 23:19
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00