The post Strategy’s mNAV falls to 19-month low as BTC outperforms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The basic multiple-to-net asset value (mNAV) per share of Strategy has fallen to a 19-month low. At just 1.21x,* the company’s common stock hasn’t traded at a worse basic premium to its bitcoin (BTC) holdings since late February 2024. Investors overwhelmingly value shares of MSTR based on the company’s BTC treasury and its prospects to accrete additional BTC. Strategy currently owns $78 billion worth of BTC but it enjoys a $94 billion market capitalization. It also made less than $350 million in gross profit over the past 12 months — in other words, not much relative to its $16 billion premium to BTC. Indeed, the vast majority of that $16 billion in extra valuation is down to optimism about founder Michael Saylor’s efforts to sell products appealing to dividend and bond investors. Unfortunately, that optimism has been waning. As recently as November, MSTR traded as high as 3.4x or 240% above the value of its BTC holdings. Today, MSTR trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium. MSTR currently trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium. 19 months of declining mNAV Even by one of its key metrics, Strategy isn’t performing as well as it performed last year. Its so-called BTC yield, the percentage change in its BTC relative to its assumed diluted shares outstanding, is up 26% — far below its 74% yield last year. The reason for this diminishing return is bad. Last year, MSTR traded at a much higher mNAV than this year.  As a result, whenever Strategy diluted MSTR shareholders via its popular at-the-market (ATM) offerings, it was able to buy more BTC per share due to MSTR’s higher mNAV premium in 2024. This year, Strategy’s lower mNAV is reducing its BTC yield. As mNAV has compressed across the past 19 months, Saylor has invented… The post Strategy’s mNAV falls to 19-month low as BTC outperforms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The basic multiple-to-net asset value (mNAV) per share of Strategy has fallen to a 19-month low. At just 1.21x,* the company’s common stock hasn’t traded at a worse basic premium to its bitcoin (BTC) holdings since late February 2024. Investors overwhelmingly value shares of MSTR based on the company’s BTC treasury and its prospects to accrete additional BTC. Strategy currently owns $78 billion worth of BTC but it enjoys a $94 billion market capitalization. It also made less than $350 million in gross profit over the past 12 months — in other words, not much relative to its $16 billion premium to BTC. Indeed, the vast majority of that $16 billion in extra valuation is down to optimism about founder Michael Saylor’s efforts to sell products appealing to dividend and bond investors. Unfortunately, that optimism has been waning. As recently as November, MSTR traded as high as 3.4x or 240% above the value of its BTC holdings. Today, MSTR trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium. MSTR currently trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium. 19 months of declining mNAV Even by one of its key metrics, Strategy isn’t performing as well as it performed last year. Its so-called BTC yield, the percentage change in its BTC relative to its assumed diluted shares outstanding, is up 26% — far below its 74% yield last year. The reason for this diminishing return is bad. Last year, MSTR traded at a much higher mNAV than this year.  As a result, whenever Strategy diluted MSTR shareholders via its popular at-the-market (ATM) offerings, it was able to buy more BTC per share due to MSTR’s higher mNAV premium in 2024. This year, Strategy’s lower mNAV is reducing its BTC yield. As mNAV has compressed across the past 19 months, Saylor has invented…

Strategy’s mNAV falls to 19-month low as BTC outperforms

The basic multiple-to-net asset value (mNAV) per share of Strategy has fallen to a 19-month low. At just 1.21x,* the company’s common stock hasn’t traded at a worse basic premium to its bitcoin (BTC) holdings since late February 2024.

Investors overwhelmingly value shares of MSTR based on the company’s BTC treasury and its prospects to accrete additional BTC.

Strategy currently owns $78 billion worth of BTC but it enjoys a $94 billion market capitalization. It also made less than $350 million in gross profit over the past 12 months — in other words, not much relative to its $16 billion premium to BTC.

Indeed, the vast majority of that $16 billion in extra valuation is down to optimism about founder Michael Saylor’s efforts to sell products appealing to dividend and bond investors.

Unfortunately, that optimism has been waning.

As recently as November, MSTR traded as high as 3.4x or 240% above the value of its BTC holdings. Today, MSTR trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium.

MSTR currently trades at a mere 1.21x or 21% premium.

19 months of declining mNAV

Even by one of its key metrics, Strategy isn’t performing as well as it performed last year. Its so-called BTC yield, the percentage change in its BTC relative to its assumed diluted shares outstanding, is up 26% — far below its 74% yield last year.

The reason for this diminishing return is bad. Last year, MSTR traded at a much higher mNAV than this year. 

As a result, whenever Strategy diluted MSTR shareholders via its popular at-the-market (ATM) offerings, it was able to buy more BTC per share due to MSTR’s higher mNAV premium in 2024.

This year, Strategy’s lower mNAV is reducing its BTC yield.

As mNAV has compressed across the past 19 months, Saylor has invented an assortment of non-dilutive offerings like STRK, STRF, STRD, and STRC. These non-dilutive, dividend-paying preferred shares have slightly attenuated some of the decline in BTC yield via MSTR ATMs.

Nonetheless, MSTR ATMs have remained the company’s largest source of capital.

Bitcoin outperforms MSTR in 2025

Part of the reason for Strategy’s declining mNAV could be the relative outperformance of BTC itself this year.

Year to date, BTC is up 31% versus Strategy’s far less impressive 13.3%.

Strategy even introduced a new variant of mNAV in the months after its 3.4x November 2024 high. New and improved, it now broadcasts a more flattering enterprise value mNAV of 1.4x.

This revised metric assumes investors care about the company’s notional debt and notional preferreds outstanding when calculating the multiple of MSTR to Strategy’s BTC. If they do, they can find a 1.4x instead of a less impressive, 1.21x basic mNAV.

Still, even this diluted mNAV is at 19-month lows. Although the numerical figure is larger, the multi-month downtrend is similar for both metrics.

The fact is, anyone who bought BTC directly has outperformed MSTR investors since the start of the year. As months have dragged on, some investors are steadily losing optimism in Strategy’s dilutive ATMs and other novelty offerings.

Read more: MSTR down $8B this quarter despite inflows from global institutions

What can catalyze a resurgence for Strategy’s mNAV?

Eventually, investors need a reason to bid MSTR back up to a higher mNAV.

Common shareholders are continually diluted — including after reneged promises to stop dilution below 2.5x mNAV. Worse, common shareholders might not even have any legal ownership of Strategy’s BTC in the first place. 

Along the way, corporate insiders have sold millions of dollars’ worth of Strategy shares. For example, Strategy board member Carl Rickertsen recently dumped all of his shares for $10 million.

Saylor has also sold millions of dollars worth of MSTR. Other executives and directors have also sold for years.

Strategy currently owns 640,031 BTC that it acquired at an average cost of $73,983, which gives the company plenty of padding beneath the prevailing $121,700 price of BTC. However, the company’s fiscal survival is an entirely different matter than its decline mNAV.

Strategy will be fine if the mNAV declines to 1x. MSTR investors, in contrast, have already lost 39% from their 52-week high and could still have more to lose.

*All figures as of October 7 Nasdaq market close.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/strategys-mnav-falls-to-19-month-low-as-btc-outperforms/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$91,033.37
$91,033.37$91,033.37
-2.18%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Bitmine Immersion now controls 3.4% of Ethereum amid shrinking exchange supply and rising institutional accumulation.
Share
Crypto Breaking News2026/01/20 16:27