The post Nostalgia Isn’t Enough To Save Hollywood. But AI Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What if AI could resurrect Tinseltown’s fading magic? Deposit Photos The Bad Guys 2 M3GAN 2.0 Spinal Tap II: The End Continues This is just a few of the many sequels in theaters now. There’s more. It’s fair to say Hollywood’s recent playbook is to keep pumping them out. Hollywood Now Runs on Nostalgia Fumes “Just last year, nearly every month a studio was releasing either a prequel, sequel, remake, reboot or my personal favorite, the soft reboot,” explains Justin Hood for FSU News. It’s to the point, he explains, that Disney is cannibalizing its animated fare just to put something familiar onscreen. “What’s next? Are Shrek and Madagascar getting live-action remakes, too? Let us just hope some hack screenwriter isn’t getting any ideas from this article.” With so much derivative fare, it may seem the entertainment industry has run out of ideas. Few truly believe that. The truth is nostalgia sells. With the average film costing between $100 and $150 million to produce, studios are reluctant to take chances on new ideas when they can mine the past for proven intellectual property. Except there’s even a problem with that strategy. The Entertainment Industry is struggling to source more franchise material from its ever-dwindling I.P. quarry. “But after mining the most iconic franchises, studios are now scraping the bottom of the intellectual property barrel,” writes Collider. “The next wave of legacy sequels is bringing back not icons, but characters from modest hits like Practical Magic, The Devil Wears Prada, and Meet the Parents. These films might have their fans, but they don’t have the long-term cultural hold of larger properties.” Enter Artificial Intelligence Fortunately, AI can help. And not just because it now has the power of Silicon Valley in its back pocket. (Consider the arrival of Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated character attracting interest from… The post Nostalgia Isn’t Enough To Save Hollywood. But AI Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What if AI could resurrect Tinseltown’s fading magic? Deposit Photos The Bad Guys 2 M3GAN 2.0 Spinal Tap II: The End Continues This is just a few of the many sequels in theaters now. There’s more. It’s fair to say Hollywood’s recent playbook is to keep pumping them out. Hollywood Now Runs on Nostalgia Fumes “Just last year, nearly every month a studio was releasing either a prequel, sequel, remake, reboot or my personal favorite, the soft reboot,” explains Justin Hood for FSU News. It’s to the point, he explains, that Disney is cannibalizing its animated fare just to put something familiar onscreen. “What’s next? Are Shrek and Madagascar getting live-action remakes, too? Let us just hope some hack screenwriter isn’t getting any ideas from this article.” With so much derivative fare, it may seem the entertainment industry has run out of ideas. Few truly believe that. The truth is nostalgia sells. With the average film costing between $100 and $150 million to produce, studios are reluctant to take chances on new ideas when they can mine the past for proven intellectual property. Except there’s even a problem with that strategy. The Entertainment Industry is struggling to source more franchise material from its ever-dwindling I.P. quarry. “But after mining the most iconic franchises, studios are now scraping the bottom of the intellectual property barrel,” writes Collider. “The next wave of legacy sequels is bringing back not icons, but characters from modest hits like Practical Magic, The Devil Wears Prada, and Meet the Parents. These films might have their fans, but they don’t have the long-term cultural hold of larger properties.” Enter Artificial Intelligence Fortunately, AI can help. And not just because it now has the power of Silicon Valley in its back pocket. (Consider the arrival of Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated character attracting interest from…

Nostalgia Isn’t Enough To Save Hollywood. But AI Might Be

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

What if AI could resurrect Tinseltown’s fading magic?

Deposit Photos

The Bad Guys 2

M3GAN 2.0

Spinal Tap II: The End Continues

This is just a few of the many sequels in theaters now. There’s more. It’s fair to say Hollywood’s recent playbook is to keep pumping them out.

Hollywood Now Runs on Nostalgia Fumes

“Just last year, nearly every month a studio was releasing either a prequel, sequel, remake, reboot or my personal favorite, the soft reboot,” explains Justin Hood for FSU News. It’s to the point, he explains, that Disney is cannibalizing its animated fare just to put something familiar onscreen. “What’s next? Are Shrek and Madagascar getting live-action remakes, too? Let us just hope some hack screenwriter isn’t getting any ideas from this article.”

With so much derivative fare, it may seem the entertainment industry has run out of ideas. Few truly believe that. The truth is nostalgia sells. With the average film costing between $100 and $150 million to produce, studios are reluctant to take chances on new ideas when they can mine the past for proven intellectual property.

Except there’s even a problem with that strategy.

The Entertainment Industry is struggling to source more franchise material from its ever-dwindling I.P. quarry. “But after mining the most iconic franchises, studios are now scraping the bottom of the intellectual property barrel,” writes Collider. “The next wave of legacy sequels is bringing back not icons, but characters from modest hits like Practical Magic, The Devil Wears Prada, and Meet the Parents. These films might have their fans, but they don’t have the long-term cultural hold of larger properties.”

Enter Artificial Intelligence

Fortunately, AI can help.

And not just because it now has the power of Silicon Valley in its back pocket. (Consider the arrival of Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated character attracting interest from talent agencies and roiling real Hollywood stars.)

No, the power I’m speaking of is resurrecting the dead to infuse life into a flatlining entertainment industry. To understand how, let’s revisit what I recently wrote for Forbes about digital mind clones. Based on large language model (LLM) tech, it’s possible to produce replicas of people’s cognitive styles and personalities. This is especially helpful from an advisory standpoint. Imagine filling your company’s board with deceased luminaries such as Steve Jobs, Estee Lauder, Ray Kroc, and Sam Walton.

Helpful as that is, LLM tech can also serve another business purpose: breathing new vibrancy into movies. Sora 2 shows us how. By now you’ve likely seen deepfake videos featuring unlikely celebrity mashups. One presents the late singer Amy Winehouse preparing ceviche alongside rapper Tupac Shakur and Queen Elizabeth II. (There are even versions with them speaking in Spanish, further demonstrating AI’s versatility.)

Bring Back the Stars We Love

Amusing as these videos are, they reveal something more profound: a possible play to boost box office sales: restore beloved golden age Hollywood stars to the Silver Screen. Why settle for reheated mid-tier content like The Devil Wears Prada or Meet the Parents when you could greenlight a film starring an AI-revived Humphrey Bogart alongside Timothée Chalamet?

In fact, why not drop Bogie in for a cameo on Dune: Part Three scheduled for release in December 2026? His surprising appearance alone could massively elevate ticket sales. This is especially true if you dropped in a few other deceased starlets he once played alongside for good measure, including Lauren Bacall, Ingrid Bergman, Katherine Hepburn and Mary Astor.

As Sora 2 shows, it’s quite possible to technically pull off this feat. Actually, the biggest challenge will likely involve rights, specifically determining if studios and/or streaming platforms possess the legal wherewithal to cast deceased actors into movies they never agreed to appear in when alive.

Digital Resurrection’s Legal Difficulties

The issue drew global attention in 2019 when producers announced that James Dean, who died in 1955, would star in the Vietnam-era drama Finding Jack. According to the University of Texas at Austin’s Center for Media Engagement, “Magic City Films obtained the rights to Dean’s image from Dean’s estate and CMG Worldwide—the intellectual property management company that has represented Dean’s family for 38 years. Magic City Films partnered with Canadian VFX banner Imagine Engine and South African VFX company MOI Worldwide to re-create Dean using footage/photos to construct a ‘full body’ CGI’ performance with another actor’s voice.”

Though that film still hasn’t officially released, the legality involving it has only become more pressing in recent years due to AI. As International Documentary Association describes the issue, “In general, whether a deceased person’s estate has a post-mortem right of publicity—essentially a right to profit from and control commercial use of the deceased’s name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness—is primarily a question of state law. Twenty-four states—including California, New York, Florida, Hawaii, Nevada and Texas—recognize a post-mortem right of publicity under state common law or statute.” According to the IDA, such laws do permit “transferable property rights” to one’s deceased heirs and/or presumably studios that may own such rights, enabling them to be used for continuing commercial ends.

The New Creative Frontier

Setting aside such legal considerations, Dune 3 starring Bogart et al, barely hints at the creative possibilities LLMs offer Hollywood to right its content ship. Only a few decades ago, marquee names like Leonardo DiCaprio, Julie Roberts, Tom Hanks and Robert Redford drew fans to the theaters in droves to see their next screen gem. Even if some actors are past their prime, Hollywood need not count them out. Once more, stars could brought back to the screen to play alongside each other at any desired age or even to appear with deceased actors from previous generations.

Purists may balk at the idea of a younger Matt Damon in a new Bourne Identity facing off against Clark Gable as a formidable villain, yet Hollywood is already saturated with sequels. Why not try something really novel? In that case, it might not be a bad idea to cast Marilyn Monroe as Bourne’s new love interest.

Of course, renewed movie magic brought to us by AI needn’t stop with recasting beloved stars from bygone eras. Again, nostalgia is Hollywood’s current revenue model. Thanks to newfangled tools like Sora 2 and Veo 3, it’s increasingly possible to perform more creative feats, including reimagining sets and time periods. Why not recreate Die Hard—only this time set the whole thing in space with John McClane dueling Hans Gruber on the International Space Station? How about remaking Laurence of Arabia with a whole new cast of classic actors, only this time shot in 1940s black-and-white noir? Not only that, but you could flip the point of view this time around, reimagining the story via the eyes of the Bedouin tribes.

But why stop there? You could even create a Director’s Cut DVD and/or Blue Ray edition in which you posthumously interview the real T.E. Lawrence, again using LLMs based on his original writings to get his take on the moral conflicts of colonialism. Clearly, the options are endless when we apply new tools to old problems. Though these ideas may rankle legacy sensibilities, they hint at what’s possible when we open our minds to more avenues of creativity. They also suggest another Hollywood Golden Age may be around the corner.

Only this one will look very different from everything that came before it.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelashley/2025/10/20/nostalgia-isnt-enough-to-save-hollywood-but-ai-might-be/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006681
$0.006681$0.006681
+0.81%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55
Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Author: G3ronimo Compiled by: TechFlow HyperLiquid has grown into a mature crypto-native exchange, with the majority of its net fees programmatically distributed directly to token holders through an "Assistance Fund" (AF). This design makes $HYPE one of the few tokens capable of being valued based on cash flow. To date, most valuations of HyperLiquid have relied on traditional multiples, comparing it to established financial platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood, using EBITDA or revenue multiples as a reference. Unlike traditional corporate stocks, where management typically retains and reinvests earnings at their discretion, HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of transaction fees directly to token holders through a support fund. This model creates predictable and quantifiable cash flows, making it well-suited for detailed discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis rather than static multiple comparisons. Our methodology begins by determining $HYPE's cost of capital. We then invert the current market price to determine the market-implied future earnings. Finally, we apply growth projections to these earnings streams and compare the resulting intrinsic value to today's market price, revealing the valuation gap between current pricing and fundamental value. Why choose discounted cash flow (DCF) over a multiple? While other valuation methods compare HyperLiquid to Coinbase and Robinhood via EBITDA multiples, these methods have the following limitations: The difference between the corporate and token structures: Coinbase and Robinhood are corporate stocks, whose capital allocation is guided by the board of directors, and profits are retained and reinvested by management; while HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of trading fees directly to token holders through a relief fund. Direct Cash Flow: HyperLiquid's design generates predictable cash flows that are well-suited to DCF models, rather than static multiples. Growth and risk characteristics: DCFs are able to explicitly model different growth scenarios and risk adjustments, whereas multiples may not adequately capture growth and risk dynamics. Determining an appropriate discount rate To determine our cost of equity, we start with reference data from the public market and adjust for cryptocurrency-specific risks: Cost of equity (r) ≈ Risk-free rate + β × Market risk premium + Crypto/illiquidity premium Beta Analysis Based on regression analysis with the S&P 500: Robinhood (HOOD): Beta of 2.5, implied cost of equity of 15.6%; Coinbase (COIN): Beta of 2.0, implied cost of equity of 13.6%; HyperLiquid (HYPE): Beta is 1.38 and the implied cost of equity is 10.5%. At first glance, $HYPE appears to have a lower beta, and therefore a lower cost of equity than Robinhood and Coinbase. However, the R² value reveals an important limitation: HOOD: The S&P 500 explains 50% of its returns; COIN: The S&P 500 explains 34% of its return; HYPE: The S&P 500 only explains 5% of its returns. $HYPE’s low R² suggests that traditional stock market factors are insufficient to explain its price fluctuations, and crypto-native risk factors need to be considered. risk assessment Despite $HYPE’s lower beta, we still adjust its discount rate from 10.5% to 13% (which is more conservative compared to COIN’s 13.6% and HOOD’s 15.6%) for the following reasons: Lower governance risk: Direct programmatic distribution of 93% of fees reduces concerns about corporate governance. In contrast, COIN and HOOD do not return any earnings to shareholders, and their capital allocation is determined by management. Higher Market Risk: $HYPE is a crypto-native asset and is subject to additional regulatory and technological uncertainties. Liquidity considerations: Token markets are generally less liquid than established stock markets. Get the Market Implied Price (MIP) Using our 13% discount rate, we can reverse engineer the market’s implied earnings expectations at the current $HYPE token price of approximately $54: Current market expectations: 2025: Total revenue of $700 million 2026: Total revenue of $1.4 billion Terminal growth: 3% annual growth thereafter These assumptions yield an intrinsic value of approximately $54, which is consistent with current market prices. This suggests that the market is pricing in modest growth based on current fee levels. At this point we need to ask a question: Does the market-implied price (MIP) reflect future cash flows? Alternative growth scenarios @Keisan_Crypto presents an attractive 2-year and 5-year bull market scenario. Original tweet link: Click here Two-year bull market forecast According to @Keisan_Crypto’s analysis, if HyperLiquid achieves the following goals: Annualized fees: $3.6 billion Aid fund income: $3.35 billion (93% of fees) Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $128 (140% undervalued at current price) Related links Five-year bull market scenario Under a five-year bull market scenario (link), he predicts that transaction fees will reach $10 billion annually, with $9.3 billion accruing to $HYPE. He assumes HyperLiquid's global market share will grow from its current 5% to 50% by 2030. Even if it doesn't reach 50% market share, these figures are still achievable with a smaller market share as global trading volumes continue to grow. Five-year bull market forecast Annualized fees: $10 billion Aid fund income: $9.3 billion Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $385 (600% undervalued at current price) Related links While this valuation is lower than Keisan's $1,000 target, the difference stems from our assumption of normalized earnings growth at 3% annually thereafter, while Keisan's model uses a cash flow multiple. We believe using cash flow multiples to project long-term value is problematic, as market multiples are volatile and can vary significantly over time. Furthermore, the multiples themselves incorporate earnings growth assumptions, while using the same cash flow multiple five years from now as one or two years later implies that growth levels from 2030 onward will be consistent with those in 2026/2027. Therefore, the multiples are more appropriate for short-term asset pricing. However, regardless of which model is used, $HYPE remains undervalued; this is a subtle difference. Additional Value Driver: USDH Under the Native Market model, USDH will use 50% of its stablecoin revenue for buybacks similar to a bailout fund. As a result, $HYPE can increase its free cash flow by $100 million (50% of $200 million) annually. Looking ahead five years, if USDH's market capitalization reaches $25 billion (currently still one-third of USDC's, and an even smaller portion of the total stablecoin market five years from now), its annual revenue could reach $1 billion. Following the same 50% distribution model, this would generate an additional $500 million in free cash flow per year for the aid fund. This would value each token at over $400. Excluding Value Drivers: HIP-3 and HyperEVM This DCF analysis intentionally excludes two important potential value drivers that are not amenable to cash flow modeling. Clearly, these would provide additional incremental value and could therefore be evaluated separately using different valuation methodologies and then added to this valuation. Summarize Our DCF analysis indicates that if HyperLiquid can maintain its growth trajectory and market position, the $HYPE token is significantly undervalued. The token's unique feature of programmatic fee distribution makes it particularly suitable for cash flow-based valuation methodologies. Methodological Notes This analysis builds on research by @Keisan_Crypto and @GLC_Research. The DCF model is open source and can be modified at the following link: https://valypto.xyz/project/hyperliquid/oNQraQIg Market data and forecasts are subject to change, and models should be updated promptly based on the latest information.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 08:00