The post 1 Statistical Trend That May Predict Who Wins Coach Of The Year appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. DALLAS, TEXAS – OCTOBER 24: Head coach Gregg Popovich of the San Antonio Spurs looks on while playing the Dallas Mavericks during the first quarter of the game at American Airlines Center on October 24, 2024 in Dallas, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Sam Hodde/Getty Images) Getty Images One of the hardest categories to predict each year is the Coach of the Year award. Unlike the Most Valuable Player trophy, you can’t just pinpoint a handful of the best players in the league and choose between them. Yes, you do need to be a good coach to earn this honor. But there are a ton of great coaches in this league that merit praise and consideration. To win this award, you need to be a good coach, and you need to have the narrative in your favor. But how can you predict the plot of a story that hasn’t been written yet? Well, you can’t. What you can do, though, is look at past data to try to create the best possible guess. The Element Of Surprise Upon examining past Coach of the Year winners, we observe a distinct trend. The winner of the award is often the lead man of a crew that vastly exceeds their preseason expectations. The Cleveland Cavaliers (coached by reigning COY Kenny Atkinson) won 16 more games in 2024-25 than they did in 2023-24. The Oklahoma City Thunder (Mark Daigneault) won 17 more games in 2023-24 than they did in 2022-23. The Sacramento Kings (Mike Brown) won 18 more games in 2022-23 than they did in 2021-22. Etc, etc. I know what you’re thinking, “That’s cool and… The post 1 Statistical Trend That May Predict Who Wins Coach Of The Year appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. DALLAS, TEXAS – OCTOBER 24: Head coach Gregg Popovich of the San Antonio Spurs looks on while playing the Dallas Mavericks during the first quarter of the game at American Airlines Center on October 24, 2024 in Dallas, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Sam Hodde/Getty Images) Getty Images One of the hardest categories to predict each year is the Coach of the Year award. Unlike the Most Valuable Player trophy, you can’t just pinpoint a handful of the best players in the league and choose between them. Yes, you do need to be a good coach to earn this honor. But there are a ton of great coaches in this league that merit praise and consideration. To win this award, you need to be a good coach, and you need to have the narrative in your favor. But how can you predict the plot of a story that hasn’t been written yet? Well, you can’t. What you can do, though, is look at past data to try to create the best possible guess. The Element Of Surprise Upon examining past Coach of the Year winners, we observe a distinct trend. The winner of the award is often the lead man of a crew that vastly exceeds their preseason expectations. The Cleveland Cavaliers (coached by reigning COY Kenny Atkinson) won 16 more games in 2024-25 than they did in 2023-24. The Oklahoma City Thunder (Mark Daigneault) won 17 more games in 2023-24 than they did in 2022-23. The Sacramento Kings (Mike Brown) won 18 more games in 2022-23 than they did in 2021-22. Etc, etc. I know what you’re thinking, “That’s cool and…

1 Statistical Trend That May Predict Who Wins Coach Of The Year

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

DALLAS, TEXAS – OCTOBER 24: Head coach Gregg Popovich of the San Antonio Spurs looks on while playing the Dallas Mavericks during the first quarter of the game at American Airlines Center on October 24, 2024 in Dallas, Texas. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Sam Hodde/Getty Images)

Getty Images

One of the hardest categories to predict each year is the Coach of the Year award. Unlike the Most Valuable Player trophy, you can’t just pinpoint a handful of the best players in the league and choose between them.

Yes, you do need to be a good coach to earn this honor. But there are a ton of great coaches in this league that merit praise and consideration. To win this award, you need to be a good coach, and you need to have the narrative in your favor.

But how can you predict the plot of a story that hasn’t been written yet? Well, you can’t. What you can do, though, is look at past data to try to create the best possible guess.

The Element Of Surprise

Upon examining past Coach of the Year winners, we observe a distinct trend. The winner of the award is often the lead man of a crew that vastly exceeds their preseason expectations. The Cleveland Cavaliers (coached by reigning COY Kenny Atkinson) won 16 more games in 2024-25 than they did in 2023-24. The Oklahoma City Thunder (Mark Daigneault) won 17 more games in 2023-24 than they did in 2022-23. The Sacramento Kings (Mike Brown) won 18 more games in 2022-23 than they did in 2021-22. Etc, etc.

I know what you’re thinking, “That’s cool and all, but how do you accurately guess which teams will be the most surprising if we haven’t seen any of them play basketball yet?”

To that, I respond that, while we haven’t seen them play in the regular season, we have seen them play basketball.

It may just be exhibition, but the preseason does have some predictive value. And one thing it helps us determine is what teams may be in the mood to take a massive step forward in the upcoming season. In 2021-22, the Chicago Bulls finished second in net rating in the preseason and went on to win 15 more games than they did in 2020-21 (per NBA.com). The Kings were first in preseason net rating in 2022-23 and had an 18-game improvement. The Orlando Magic were fifth in net rating and had a 13-win bump. Last year, the Detroit Pistons were seventh in net rating before their record-breaking turnaround.

Anecdotally, this feels like more than a mere coincidence. All those teams were eager to prove to the league that they were not the same team that they were in the season before. They weren’t taking these games for granted. They were using them as a runway to build up momentum heading into the regular season.

Only one of those teams ended up having a coach who won COY (the Kings and Brown), but two of them (Jamahl Mosley and J.B. Bickerstaff) finished as runner-ups for the nomination. So, this signal isn’t perfect, but it certainly helps narrow down the pool of potential candidates.

Mitch Johnson Could Win Coach Of The Year

Anyway, the team from this preseason that seems primed to follow this pattern is the San Antonio Spurs. After winning just 34 games and finishing 21st in net rating (-2.8), the Spurs were first in net rating, posting a +16.2 per 100 possessions, en route to a perfect 5-0 record. With Victor Wembanyama heading into Year Three, De’Aaron Fox getting set for his first full season with the team, and a cavalcade of tantalizing young players looking to make their mark, San Antonio could shock the world and go from a mid 30-win team to a high-40s/low-50s one.

If that happens, head coach Mitch Johnson would get a ton of credit from the media and fans across the league for being the orchestrator of such a drastic turnaround. Plus, he has the whole “heir to Gregg Popovich’s throne” angle going for him.

Even with this data point, I still find it unlikely that Johnson wins the most prestigious award a basketball coach can win in his first full season as an NBA head coach (my personal prediction is Erik Spoelstra). But at +2500 odds to win it (per FanDuel), Johnson is worth throwing a dart at if you’re into that market.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/matissa/2025/10/21/1-statistical-trend-that-may-predict-who-wins-coach-of-the-year/

Market Opportunity
LooksRare Logo
LooksRare Price(LOOKS)
$0.0005295
$0.0005295$0.0005295
+1.22%
USD
LooksRare (LOOKS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

[Finterest] How do you start saving with Pag-IBIG’s MP2 program?

[Finterest] How do you start saving with Pag-IBIG’s MP2 program?

MP2 may be right for you if you have a conservative risk appetite and an investment horizon of at least 5 years
Share
Rappler2026/03/12 13:05
XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze hints at breakout before CPI

XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze hints at breakout before CPI

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
XRP steadies near $1.38 as Bollinger squeeze
Share
Coindesk2026/03/12 13:15
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00