China’s Crypto strategy is turning money into a weapon of statecraft. A recent study published by Study Times—the journal of China’s Central Party School—argued that digital assets now shape warfare and finance. The study described crypto and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as tools of “financial mobilization.” They allow states to redirect liquidity when banks fail or sanctions tighten. Blockchain networks were called a “digital logistics front,” merging economic survival with national security. Digital money becomes a tool of geopolitical power The study said the battlefield now stretches into finance. Crypto forms an infrastructure for “total war,” blending deterrence, capital mobilization, and social stability. By digitizing money flows, Beijing could sustain liquidity, fund defense industries, and support domestic demand when global finance fractures. It also outlined a triad of “total war, hybrid war, and digital financial war,” claiming that digital ledgers underpin national resilience. The digital yuan and blockchain settlements act as strategic assets within this framework. They are built to operate independently of U.S. sanctions and the SWIFT network. “Digital currencies have become strategic assets in hybrid warfare, reshaping cross-border capital flows during wartime.” — Study Times (2025) This shift reflects a broader trend. Economist Barry Eichengreen notes that the dollar’s share of global reserves fell from 71% in 2000 to 58% in 2024. He wrote that governments are “moving away from the dollar… for geopolitical reasons, while firms still prefer its liquidity.” Meanwhile, Beijing’s mBridge project—linking CBDCs from China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and the UAE—seeks to bypass SWIFT and build a parallel network beyond the US’s reach. For China, blockchain means more than speed; it represents autonomy under economic pressure. The TRM Labs 2025 Crypto Crime Report shows that digital assets operate on both sides of the geopolitical battlefield. Sanctioned exchanges such as Russia’s Garantex and Iran’s Nobitex handled over 85% of illicit inflows to restricted markets. Distribution of 86 designated addresses | TRM Terror groups—including Hamas, Hezbollah, and ISIS affiliates—used stablecoins like USDT on TRON to raise funds. As a result, Israel froze millions in related accounts. Digital finance, once hailed as borderless innovation, has instead become a field of control and enforcement. From cyber defense to “soft power” projection Military theorist Jason P. Lowery argues in Softwar that Bitcoin is “a non-lethal form of power projection—a digital defense system secured by electricity, not explosives.” This idea now shapes Beijing’s view of blockchain as a base for resilience and deterrence. By embedding monetary control in code, states can project power through networks instead of troops. Visualizing blockchain applications in military contexts | Blockchain Applications in the Military Domain A 2025 review in Technologies found that blockchain “strengthens military operations through secure communication, immutable logistics, and quantum-safe authentication.” Researchers said distributed ledgers can harden command systems and supply chains against cyber or physical attacks. These findings show how cryptographic infrastructure is shifting from finance to defense, linking data integrity, funding agility, and operational trust. The geopolitical divide is widening. Western governments aim to limit crypto’s militarization, whereas China embeds it in state policy. As Eichengreen cautioned, “geopolitics cuts both ways.” Depending on who builds the rails, crypto could weaken or reinforce dollar dominance. Ultimately, Beijing’s hybrid model—combining economic control with technological sovereignty—signals that the next great-power contest will unfold in markets or cyberspace and across the distributed ledgers that connect them.China’s Crypto strategy is turning money into a weapon of statecraft. A recent study published by Study Times—the journal of China’s Central Party School—argued that digital assets now shape warfare and finance. The study described crypto and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as tools of “financial mobilization.” They allow states to redirect liquidity when banks fail or sanctions tighten. Blockchain networks were called a “digital logistics front,” merging economic survival with national security. Digital money becomes a tool of geopolitical power The study said the battlefield now stretches into finance. Crypto forms an infrastructure for “total war,” blending deterrence, capital mobilization, and social stability. By digitizing money flows, Beijing could sustain liquidity, fund defense industries, and support domestic demand when global finance fractures. It also outlined a triad of “total war, hybrid war, and digital financial war,” claiming that digital ledgers underpin national resilience. The digital yuan and blockchain settlements act as strategic assets within this framework. They are built to operate independently of U.S. sanctions and the SWIFT network. “Digital currencies have become strategic assets in hybrid warfare, reshaping cross-border capital flows during wartime.” — Study Times (2025) This shift reflects a broader trend. Economist Barry Eichengreen notes that the dollar’s share of global reserves fell from 71% in 2000 to 58% in 2024. He wrote that governments are “moving away from the dollar… for geopolitical reasons, while firms still prefer its liquidity.” Meanwhile, Beijing’s mBridge project—linking CBDCs from China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and the UAE—seeks to bypass SWIFT and build a parallel network beyond the US’s reach. For China, blockchain means more than speed; it represents autonomy under economic pressure. The TRM Labs 2025 Crypto Crime Report shows that digital assets operate on both sides of the geopolitical battlefield. Sanctioned exchanges such as Russia’s Garantex and Iran’s Nobitex handled over 85% of illicit inflows to restricted markets. Distribution of 86 designated addresses | TRM Terror groups—including Hamas, Hezbollah, and ISIS affiliates—used stablecoins like USDT on TRON to raise funds. As a result, Israel froze millions in related accounts. Digital finance, once hailed as borderless innovation, has instead become a field of control and enforcement. From cyber defense to “soft power” projection Military theorist Jason P. Lowery argues in Softwar that Bitcoin is “a non-lethal form of power projection—a digital defense system secured by electricity, not explosives.” This idea now shapes Beijing’s view of blockchain as a base for resilience and deterrence. By embedding monetary control in code, states can project power through networks instead of troops. Visualizing blockchain applications in military contexts | Blockchain Applications in the Military Domain A 2025 review in Technologies found that blockchain “strengthens military operations through secure communication, immutable logistics, and quantum-safe authentication.” Researchers said distributed ledgers can harden command systems and supply chains against cyber or physical attacks. These findings show how cryptographic infrastructure is shifting from finance to defense, linking data integrity, funding agility, and operational trust. The geopolitical divide is widening. Western governments aim to limit crypto’s militarization, whereas China embeds it in state policy. As Eichengreen cautioned, “geopolitics cuts both ways.” Depending on who builds the rails, crypto could weaken or reinforce dollar dominance. Ultimately, Beijing’s hybrid model—combining economic control with technological sovereignty—signals that the next great-power contest will unfold in markets or cyberspace and across the distributed ledgers that connect them.