The post Stablecoins Aren’t a Threat — They’re America’s Secret Weapon, Says Coinbase appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A recent report by Coinbase argues that the US government’s stablecoin activation policies are primarily designed to bolster the dollar’s global hegemony, thus serving this purpose rather than purely domestic ones. The report challenges the notion that stablecoins threaten commercial banks’ deposit and lending functions, emphasizing the need to understand user demand and usage patterns. Debunking the “Bank Killer” Myth On Thursday, Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, pointed out on his X account that “The ‘stablecoins will destroy bank lending’ narrative ignores reality.” Sponsored Sponsored He explained that the demand for stablecoins predominantly originates outside the United States, effectively extending the dollar’s global dominance. Shirzad drew a historical parallel, noting that similar concerns arose during money market funds (MMFs) advent. “Stablecoins are doing for payments what money market funds did for savings: forcing innovation through competition,” Shirzad argued. “Faster, cheaper, programmable transactions aren’t a threat—they’re overdue progress.” Yield Concerns vs Global Utility Financial institutions on Wall Street have recently pressed for additional stablecoin regulations, particularly regarding interest payments. The GENIUS Act, enacted in July, prohibits interest payments on payment-oriented stablecoins. However, stablecoins outside direct payment contexts can still yield through DeFi or CeFi platforms. Banking interest groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, and the Consumer Bankers Association, have voiced concerns that such developments could lead to an outflow of bank deposits. Massive Deposit Outflow Concern Is Not the Issue A US Treasury Department study from April estimated a massive potential deposit outflow. Specifically, the study concluded that the banking system could lose up to $6.6 trillion if stablecoins enabled universal interest payments. However, Coinbase’s report asserts that these arguments overlook the actual use cases for stablecoins. According to Coinbase, the majority of stablecoin demand comes from international users seeking “dollar exposure.” In emerging economies, stablecoins are leveraged… The post Stablecoins Aren’t a Threat — They’re America’s Secret Weapon, Says Coinbase appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A recent report by Coinbase argues that the US government’s stablecoin activation policies are primarily designed to bolster the dollar’s global hegemony, thus serving this purpose rather than purely domestic ones. The report challenges the notion that stablecoins threaten commercial banks’ deposit and lending functions, emphasizing the need to understand user demand and usage patterns. Debunking the “Bank Killer” Myth On Thursday, Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, pointed out on his X account that “The ‘stablecoins will destroy bank lending’ narrative ignores reality.” Sponsored Sponsored He explained that the demand for stablecoins predominantly originates outside the United States, effectively extending the dollar’s global dominance. Shirzad drew a historical parallel, noting that similar concerns arose during money market funds (MMFs) advent. “Stablecoins are doing for payments what money market funds did for savings: forcing innovation through competition,” Shirzad argued. “Faster, cheaper, programmable transactions aren’t a threat—they’re overdue progress.” Yield Concerns vs Global Utility Financial institutions on Wall Street have recently pressed for additional stablecoin regulations, particularly regarding interest payments. The GENIUS Act, enacted in July, prohibits interest payments on payment-oriented stablecoins. However, stablecoins outside direct payment contexts can still yield through DeFi or CeFi platforms. Banking interest groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, and the Consumer Bankers Association, have voiced concerns that such developments could lead to an outflow of bank deposits. Massive Deposit Outflow Concern Is Not the Issue A US Treasury Department study from April estimated a massive potential deposit outflow. Specifically, the study concluded that the banking system could lose up to $6.6 trillion if stablecoins enabled universal interest payments. However, Coinbase’s report asserts that these arguments overlook the actual use cases for stablecoins. According to Coinbase, the majority of stablecoin demand comes from international users seeking “dollar exposure.” In emerging economies, stablecoins are leveraged…

Stablecoins Aren’t a Threat — They’re America’s Secret Weapon, Says Coinbase

A recent report by Coinbase argues that the US government’s stablecoin activation policies are primarily designed to bolster the dollar’s global hegemony, thus serving this purpose rather than purely domestic ones.

The report challenges the notion that stablecoins threaten commercial banks’ deposit and lending functions, emphasizing the need to understand user demand and usage patterns.

Debunking the “Bank Killer” Myth

On Thursday, Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, pointed out on his X account that “The ‘stablecoins will destroy bank lending’ narrative ignores reality.”

Sponsored

Sponsored

He explained that the demand for stablecoins predominantly originates outside the United States, effectively extending the dollar’s global dominance. Shirzad drew a historical parallel, noting that similar concerns arose during money market funds (MMFs) advent.

“Stablecoins are doing for payments what money market funds did for savings: forcing innovation through competition,” Shirzad argued. “Faster, cheaper, programmable transactions aren’t a threat—they’re overdue progress.”

Yield Concerns vs Global Utility

Financial institutions on Wall Street have recently pressed for additional stablecoin regulations, particularly regarding interest payments. The GENIUS Act, enacted in July, prohibits interest payments on payment-oriented stablecoins. However, stablecoins outside direct payment contexts can still yield through DeFi or CeFi platforms.

Banking interest groups, including the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, and the Consumer Bankers Association, have voiced concerns that such developments could lead to an outflow of bank deposits.

Massive Deposit Outflow Concern Is Not the Issue

A US Treasury Department study from April estimated a massive potential deposit outflow. Specifically, the study concluded that the banking system could lose up to $6.6 trillion if stablecoins enabled universal interest payments.

However, Coinbase’s report asserts that these arguments overlook the actual use cases for stablecoins. According to Coinbase, the majority of stablecoin demand comes from international users seeking “dollar exposure.” In emerging economies, stablecoins are leveraged as a “practical means of dollar access.” This is done to counter local currency depreciation or compensate for inadequate financial infrastructure.

The report also revealed that approximately two-thirds of all stablecoin transfers occur within decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain-based platforms. Coinbase clarified this by stating, “Stablecoins are a core element of a new financial infrastructure that runs parallel to, but independent of, the current US banking system.”

Shirzad reiterated his stance, emphasizing, “Though the banks could improve their services with stablecoins, treating stablecoins as a threat misreads the moment.” He concluded that stablecoins “strengthen the dollar’s global role and unlock competitive advantages that the US shouldn’t constrain.”

Source: https://beincrypto.com/stablecoins-arent-a-threat-theyre-americas-secret-weapon-says-coinbase/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.01008
$0.01008$0.01008
+2.60%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zijn stablecoins de toekomst van het geld?

Zijn stablecoins de toekomst van het geld?

Terwijl de Verenigde Staten onder Trump steeds meer inzetten op private stablecoins om de macht van de dollar te vergroten, versnellen Europa en China de ontwikkeling
Share
Coinstats2026/01/17 16:46
Strategic $3M Binance Move Sparks Intense Market Scrutiny

Strategic $3M Binance Move Sparks Intense Market Scrutiny

The post Strategic $3M Binance Move Sparks Intense Market Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solayer LAYER Deposit: Strategic $3M Binance Move Sparks
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 17:14
One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight

The post One Of Frank Sinatra’s Most Famous Albums Is Back In The Spotlight appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew returns to the Jazz Albums and Traditional Jazz Albums charts, showing continued demand for his timeless music. Frank Sinatra performs on his TV special Frank Sinatra: A Man and his Music Bettmann Archive These days on the Billboard charts, Frank Sinatra’s music can always be found on the jazz-specific rankings. While the art he created when he was still working was pop at the time, and later classified as traditional pop, there is no such list for the latter format in America, and so his throwback projects and cuts appear on jazz lists instead. It’s on those charts where Sinatra rebounds this week, and one of his popular projects returns not to one, but two tallies at the same time, helping him increase the total amount of real estate he owns at the moment. Frank Sinatra’s The World We Knew Returns Sinatra’s The World We Knew is a top performer again, if only on the jazz lists. That set rebounds to No. 15 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart and comes in at No. 20 on the all-encompassing Jazz Albums ranking after not appearing on either roster just last frame. The World We Knew’s All-Time Highs The World We Knew returns close to its all-time peak on both of those rosters. Sinatra’s classic has peaked at No. 11 on the Traditional Jazz Albums chart, just missing out on becoming another top 10 for the crooner. The set climbed all the way to No. 15 on the Jazz Albums tally and has now spent just under two months on the rosters. Frank Sinatra’s Album With Classic Hits Sinatra released The World We Knew in the summer of 1967. The title track, which on the album is actually known as “The World We Knew (Over and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:02