The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent… The post Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ted Hisokawa Nov 01, 2025 12:56 International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves. Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews. Understanding Basel’s Current Framework The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services. Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision. Calls for Regulatory Revisions The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies. In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent…

Global Regulators Reevaluate Crypto Banking Rules Amid Stablecoin Growth



Ted Hisokawa
Nov 01, 2025 12:56

International regulators are revisiting crypto banking regulations, focusing on stablecoins and capital requirements, as the digital asset market evolves.

Global regulators are taking a fresh look at banking rules governing crypto assets, with a particular focus on stablecoins, as the digital asset market continues to evolve rapidly. This review comes amid growing pressure from major economies and industry groups to overhaul stringent capital requirements that are set to take effect in 2026, according to CryptoNews.

Understanding Basel’s Current Framework

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), recognized as the leading authority on global banking standards, is considering amendments to its 2022 framework. This framework imposed some of the strictest capital rules for crypto holdings, requiring banks to assign a 1,250% risk weight to unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin (BTC). These measures, while designed to protect banks from potential losses, have discouraged many institutions from engaging in crypto-related services.

Stablecoins, which are digital tokens pegged to assets like the U.S. dollar, have seen rapid growth and are now at the center of regulatory debates. Despite their stability, current Basel rules subject them to the same heavy capital requirements as volatile cryptocurrencies, leading to calls for revision.

Calls for Regulatory Revisions

The United States is leading the push for updates, arguing that the original Basel standards are outdated in today’s dynamic crypto market. The U.S. GENIUS Act is one example of new regulatory frameworks encouraging the use of stablecoins for payments. However, regulatory inconsistencies remain, as permissionless stablecoins like Tether (USDT) and Circle’s USDC face the same capital charges as more volatile digital currencies.

In Europe, regulators are incorporating Basel standards into their own frameworks, with transitional rules allowing limited engagement with digital assets while more permanent solutions are developed. The European Central Bank supports implementing existing rules first, while the U.S. and other regions are seeking revisions before these standards become mandatory.

Global Divergence and Future Outlook

While Basel Committee guidelines are non-binding, member jurisdictions typically adopt them. However, timelines vary, with Singapore delaying its implementation to ensure global alignment, and Hong Kong planning to introduce lighter requirements for licensed stablecoins in 2026.

The debate over crypto banking rules is intensifying as industry groups urge the Basel Committee to ease the capital burden on banks. These discussions are crucial as stablecoins could significantly impact global finance, with some reports predicting a potential $1 trillion shift from traditional banks to stablecoins by 2028.

As regulators and industry stakeholders continue to negotiate, the evolution of these rules will likely shape the future landscape of digital asset services in the banking sector.

Image source: Shutterstock

Source: https://blockchain.news/news/global-regulators-reevaluate-crypto-banking-rules-stablecoin-growth

Market Opportunity
LOOK Logo
LOOK Price(LOOK)
$0,00715
$0,00715$0,00715
+1,27%
USD
LOOK (LOOK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz 21 February 2026: Claim Free Tokens and Boost Your Crypto Wallet

Spur Protocol Daily Quiz February 21 2026: Today’s Correct Answer and How to Earn Free In-App Tokens The Spur Protocol Daily Quiz for February 21, 2026, is
Share
Hokanews2026/02/21 17:10
Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says

The post Alex Acosta Tells Congress He Has No ‘Remorse’ For Jeffrey Epstein ‘Sweetheart Deal,’ Lawmaker Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline A central figure in the Jeffrey Epstein sexual abuse saga—former prosecutor Alex Acosta, who granted in 2007 the former financier what’s been widely blasted as a “sweetheart deal” for his alleged crimes—has no regrets about the agreement, a Democratic lawmaker told CNN on Friday, as the former Trump official faces questioning from the House Oversight Committee. Alex Acosta, center, arrives for a House Oversight Committee deposition about Jeffrey Epstein on September 19 in Washington D.C. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Key Facts This story is breaking and will be updated. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/09/19/prosecutor-acosta-who-gave-epstein-sweetheart-deal-testifies-he-no-remorse-lawmaker-says/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 06:37