Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims. Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices. Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions. The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions. This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court. Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims. According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts. Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims. Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price. When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price. Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative. While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi. Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto. Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims. Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices. Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions. The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions. This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court. Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims. According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts. Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims. Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price. When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price. Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative. While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi. Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto.

Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate

  • Ripple CTO Schwartz counters Craig Wright’s Bitcoin white paper claims.
  • Schwartz explains why Bitcoin remains viable for payments despite rising prices.
  • Legal rulings consistently dismiss Wright’s Satoshi Nakamoto identity assertions.

The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions.


This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court.


Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun


David Schwartz Responds to Wright’s Fraud Argument

Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims.


According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts.


Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims.


Ripple CTO Discusses Bitcoin’s Utility in Payments Amid Rising Prices

In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price.


When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price.


Repetitive Narrative of Wright’s Claims

Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative.


While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi.


Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details


The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
Whiterock Logo
Whiterock Price(WHITE)
$0.0001898
$0.0001898$0.0001898
-6.77%
USD
Whiterock (WHITE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00