The post Institutional Bitcoin Investors Shrug at Core vs. Knots Debate, Poll Shows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to a recent poll conducted by Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital, institutional investors could not care less about the ongoing Core vs. Knots debate within the Bitcoin community.  Most institutional investors either don’t care, haven’t heard of the debate, or are neutral. Nobody seems to actively support the Knots camp.  Inventing a problem that doesn’t exist  Thorn argues that the “Bitcoin Knots” camp is inventing a problem that doesn’t exist. He calls their concerns “hypothetical.”  At the same time, real capital, service providers, and regulators see no actual issue. The legal concerns these proponents raise are outdated “mumbo jumbo”, according to Thorn. They echo old debates about permissionless systems that Bitcoin already solved. The Knots advocates are effectively trying to roll back the freedoms of Bitcoin’s decentralized system because they are overly cautious or ideologically statist. Possible outcomes Thorn believes that the Knots crowd will most likely fade into irrelevance.  However, he doesn’t rule out that the Knots supporters might end up scaring people about hypothetical problems and creating panic. However, their fork will still fail.  According to Thorn, it’s unlikely that the adoption of Bitcoin will be harmed long-term by the Knots camp.  “These people are scared statists who fear permissionless systems and will do great damage to bitcoin if they are taken seriously,” Thorn said.  Nature of the debate  Some Knots proponents argue for changes to address security, legal, or operational concerns that most of the community sees as theoretical. Essentially, the debate is less about actual risk and more about philosophical differences over the potential dangers of decentralization and permissionless systems.  Core supporters see Knots as creating artificial problems and unnecessary forks  The Knots project is led by controversial Bitcoin developer Luke Dashir.  He’s very protective of Bitcoin’s “monetary integrity”… The post Institutional Bitcoin Investors Shrug at Core vs. Knots Debate, Poll Shows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to a recent poll conducted by Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital, institutional investors could not care less about the ongoing Core vs. Knots debate within the Bitcoin community.  Most institutional investors either don’t care, haven’t heard of the debate, or are neutral. Nobody seems to actively support the Knots camp.  Inventing a problem that doesn’t exist  Thorn argues that the “Bitcoin Knots” camp is inventing a problem that doesn’t exist. He calls their concerns “hypothetical.”  At the same time, real capital, service providers, and regulators see no actual issue. The legal concerns these proponents raise are outdated “mumbo jumbo”, according to Thorn. They echo old debates about permissionless systems that Bitcoin already solved. The Knots advocates are effectively trying to roll back the freedoms of Bitcoin’s decentralized system because they are overly cautious or ideologically statist. Possible outcomes Thorn believes that the Knots crowd will most likely fade into irrelevance.  However, he doesn’t rule out that the Knots supporters might end up scaring people about hypothetical problems and creating panic. However, their fork will still fail.  According to Thorn, it’s unlikely that the adoption of Bitcoin will be harmed long-term by the Knots camp.  “These people are scared statists who fear permissionless systems and will do great damage to bitcoin if they are taken seriously,” Thorn said.  Nature of the debate  Some Knots proponents argue for changes to address security, legal, or operational concerns that most of the community sees as theoretical. Essentially, the debate is less about actual risk and more about philosophical differences over the potential dangers of decentralization and permissionless systems.  Core supporters see Knots as creating artificial problems and unnecessary forks  The Knots project is led by controversial Bitcoin developer Luke Dashir.  He’s very protective of Bitcoin’s “monetary integrity”…

Institutional Bitcoin Investors Shrug at Core vs. Knots Debate, Poll Shows

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

According to a recent poll conducted by Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital, institutional investors could not care less about the ongoing Core vs. Knots debate within the Bitcoin community. 

Most institutional investors either don’t care, haven’t heard of the debate, or are neutral. Nobody seems to actively support the Knots camp. 

Inventing a problem that doesn’t exist 

Thorn argues that the “Bitcoin Knots” camp is inventing a problem that doesn’t exist. He calls their concerns “hypothetical.” 

At the same time, real capital, service providers, and regulators see no actual issue.

The legal concerns these proponents raise are outdated “mumbo jumbo”, according to Thorn. They echo old debates about permissionless systems that Bitcoin already solved.

The Knots advocates are effectively trying to roll back the freedoms of Bitcoin’s decentralized system because they are overly cautious or ideologically statist.

Possible outcomes

Thorn believes that the Knots crowd will most likely fade into irrelevance. 

However, he doesn’t rule out that the Knots supporters might end up scaring people about hypothetical problems and creating panic. However, their fork will still fail. 

According to Thorn, it’s unlikely that the adoption of Bitcoin will be harmed long-term by the Knots camp. 

“These people are scared statists who fear permissionless systems and will do great damage to bitcoin if they are taken seriously,” Thorn said. 

Nature of the debate 

Some Knots proponents argue for changes to address security, legal, or operational concerns that most of the community sees as theoretical.

Essentially, the debate is less about actual risk and more about philosophical differences over the potential dangers of decentralization and permissionless systems. 

Core supporters see Knots as creating artificial problems and unnecessary forks 

The Knots project is led by controversial Bitcoin developer Luke Dashir. 

He’s very protective of Bitcoin’s “monetary integrity” and is suspicious of non-financial data being embedded on-chain (inscriptions and ordinals). 

Source: https://u.today/institutional-bitcoin-investors-shrug-at-core-vs-knots-debate-poll-shows

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.07769
$0.07769$0.07769
-0.42%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why African countries are using data protection laws as backdoor to regulate AI

Why African countries are using data protection laws as backdoor to regulate AI

Rather than waiting for comprehensive AI frameworks, which are often complex and slow to develop, governments across the continent are embedding AI-related rules
Share
Techcabal2026/03/19 18:46
YieldMax Funds Explained: How These ETFs Work, What They Pay & The Hidden Risks

YieldMax Funds Explained: How These ETFs Work, What They Pay & The Hidden Risks

If you have spent any time in income-investing circles recently, you have almost certainly come across YieldMax funds the ETFs promising yields of 30%, 50%, or
Share
Fintechzoom2026/03/19 18:14
Aster Price Surges After Airdrop and CZ Mention

Aster Price Surges After Airdrop and CZ Mention

The post Aster Price Surges After Airdrop and CZ Mention appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aster, previously referred to as APX, witnessed its token price soar on September 18, rising by over 360% in one day. The surge followed after the project started its airdrop program and from CZ. What’s Driving Aster Price Surge The token’s steep price action came after the token’s airdrop began, and it will run until October 17. Approximately 704 million tokens representing approximately 8.8% of the total supply are being sent to eligible users. These include members of Aster’s Spectra Stage 0 and 1 programs, owners of Aster Gems, and traders of Aster Pro. Adding fuel to the charge, CZ publicly congratulated the Aster team, further increasing visibility to the project. That validation, combined with the token distribution, driven the price surge. Fundamentals Behind the Rally Beyond the frenzy, Aster’s fundamentals have been improving. Based on statistics provided by DeFi Llama. Its perpetual futures platform has seen more than $12 billion worth of trading volume this month, an increase from $9.78 billion in August and $8.5 billion last July. Revenue has increased steeply as well. Fees earned this quarter total $8.82 million, up from only $1.8 million during the same time last year. In Q3 2024, Aster had only generated $11,660 in revenue, but today that number is up to $5.4 million. The total value locked (TVL) in the protocol has hit a record high of $1.85 billion, an astronomical increase from $141 million in January. What’s Next for Aster Analysts believe that the rally may prevail since Aster is now becoming available on additional exchanges, yet it is mainly traded on its own platform. Yet with recipients of the airdrop likely to take profits in place, there will be some pressure selling. Like other recently listed coins like WLFI, Spark, and Avantis, a good starting run will be followed…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 08:30