The post S&P 500 declines to add Strategy again appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. S&P Dow Jones Indices has declined to add Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) to its S&P 500 index again. Instead of MSTR, the world’s most prestigious stock index chose SanDisk to replace Interpublic Group. Although its US Index Committee doesn’t normally explain its decisions, the mid-quarter announcement was curious. The decision didn’t coincide with the committee’s quarterly cadence and only included a single stock change. Normally, quarterly rebalancing announcements occur during the final month of each calendar quarter, and include multiple companies joining and exiting the index simultaneously. MSTR satisfies most S&P 500 Index criteria The S&P 500 establishes technical criteria for inclusion, and founder Michael Saylor has ensured that Strategy’s MSTR common stock satisfies every metric. Nonetheless, the committee has declined to add MSTR for months. As a qualifying candidate, Strategy has a US domicile, derives the majority of its revenue domestically, trades on the NASDAQ (NYSE or CBOE would also qualify), has a market capitalization in the 85th percentile of the S&P Total Market Index, had positive GAAP earnings in its most recent quarter, traded a minimum of 250,000 shares in its prior six months, and had a sum of positive GAAP earnings for its four most recent quarters. Despite meeting all of these quantitative criteria earlier this year, Strategy management speculated as to possible reasons for the index committee’s denials. First of all, most companies don’t gain immediate inclusion after they first satisfy all of the quantitative benchmarks. The S&P US Index Committee normally waits a few quarters to add them. Indeed, even Tesla and many other household names, despite their prominence, had to wait several quarters before they joined the S&P 500. Read more: Why the S&P 500 committee could deny MSTR inclusion on Friday More possible reasons for S&P 500 delays MSTR hasn’t been performing particularly well… The post S&P 500 declines to add Strategy again appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. S&P Dow Jones Indices has declined to add Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) to its S&P 500 index again. Instead of MSTR, the world’s most prestigious stock index chose SanDisk to replace Interpublic Group. Although its US Index Committee doesn’t normally explain its decisions, the mid-quarter announcement was curious. The decision didn’t coincide with the committee’s quarterly cadence and only included a single stock change. Normally, quarterly rebalancing announcements occur during the final month of each calendar quarter, and include multiple companies joining and exiting the index simultaneously. MSTR satisfies most S&P 500 Index criteria The S&P 500 establishes technical criteria for inclusion, and founder Michael Saylor has ensured that Strategy’s MSTR common stock satisfies every metric. Nonetheless, the committee has declined to add MSTR for months. As a qualifying candidate, Strategy has a US domicile, derives the majority of its revenue domestically, trades on the NASDAQ (NYSE or CBOE would also qualify), has a market capitalization in the 85th percentile of the S&P Total Market Index, had positive GAAP earnings in its most recent quarter, traded a minimum of 250,000 shares in its prior six months, and had a sum of positive GAAP earnings for its four most recent quarters. Despite meeting all of these quantitative criteria earlier this year, Strategy management speculated as to possible reasons for the index committee’s denials. First of all, most companies don’t gain immediate inclusion after they first satisfy all of the quantitative benchmarks. The S&P US Index Committee normally waits a few quarters to add them. Indeed, even Tesla and many other household names, despite their prominence, had to wait several quarters before they joined the S&P 500. Read more: Why the S&P 500 committee could deny MSTR inclusion on Friday More possible reasons for S&P 500 delays MSTR hasn’t been performing particularly well…

S&P 500 declines to add Strategy again

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

S&P Dow Jones Indices has declined to add Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) to its S&P 500 index again. Instead of MSTR, the world’s most prestigious stock index chose SanDisk to replace Interpublic Group.

Although its US Index Committee doesn’t normally explain its decisions, the mid-quarter announcement was curious. The decision didn’t coincide with the committee’s quarterly cadence and only included a single stock change.

Normally, quarterly rebalancing announcements occur during the final month of each calendar quarter, and include multiple companies joining and exiting the index simultaneously.

MSTR satisfies most S&P 500 Index criteria

The S&P 500 establishes technical criteria for inclusion, and founder Michael Saylor has ensured that Strategy’s MSTR common stock satisfies every metric.

Nonetheless, the committee has declined to add MSTR for months.

As a qualifying candidate, Strategy has a US domicile, derives the majority of its revenue domestically, trades on the NASDAQ (NYSE or CBOE would also qualify), has a market capitalization in the 85th percentile of the S&P Total Market Index, had positive GAAP earnings in its most recent quarter, traded a minimum of 250,000 shares in its prior six months, and had a sum of positive GAAP earnings for its four most recent quarters.

Despite meeting all of these quantitative criteria earlier this year, Strategy management speculated as to possible reasons for the index committee’s denials.

First of all, most companies don’t gain immediate inclusion after they first satisfy all of the quantitative benchmarks. The S&P US Index Committee normally waits a few quarters to add them.

Indeed, even Tesla and many other household names, despite their prominence, had to wait several quarters before they joined the S&P 500.

Read more: Why the S&P 500 committee could deny MSTR inclusion on Friday

More possible reasons for S&P 500 delays

MSTR hasn’t been performing particularly well this year. Its stock price is 39% lower today than at the start of 2025, and its recent performance has been particularly bearish.

After a 12-month slide, its market cap is now lower than the value of its bitcoin (BTC) holdings.

In addition, Strategy CEO Phong Le admitted that Strategy’s heavy reliance on BTC as an asset is problematic for S&P 500 inclusion. Although holding large amounts of BTC doesn’t preclude approval, 10-Q reports and other SEC filings for Strategy are considerably different from other companies. 

With over $48 billion in BTC purchases, Strategy tallies billions of dollars of unrealized gains as a peculiar type of asset that almost no other S&P 500 constituent possesses.

Although the filings comply with modern accounting rules, they are non-standard and might be a reason for the S&P US Index Committee’s slow review of Strategy’s application to join their index.

Finally, the committee is ultimately free to use discretion in determining additions and removals. Committee members are anonymous and don’t customarily explain their decisions.

They might evaluate long-term stability in a stock’s performance, creditworthiness to pay dividends and bond coupons, or other squishy metrics that are difficult to infer from public reporting about their closed door meetings.

Although S&P Dow Jones Indices may reschedule its Q4 announcement for any date, its customary quarterly decisions are likely to occur after market close on December 5. MSTR remains a qualifying candidate for possible inclusion.

On Kalshi, a binary options gambling website, traders are accepting bets at 8% odds that MSTR will join the S&P 500 Index this year.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/sp-500-declines-to-add-strategy-again/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0,006553
$0,006553$0,006553
+%2,24
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10